Has canon gone insane?

LDJS Photography

Leading Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
619
Seriously. I shoot Fujifilm now but used to shoot Canon APSC and would have stayed on board if they had a m/less camera that had both an EVF AND a silent shutter in the M series (they do not.)

Just been looking at the R10 and 18-45mm slow lens by random chance not because I want one or will leave Fujifilm.

Have to say I'd take an M5 or M50 any day over that....

Seems like a step backwards the M range was small, light, good IQ and had some cool lenses like the 22mm F2 and 32mm f1.4... the nice 11-22mm, add maybe a 56mm F1.4....

They should have kept the M line going and kept bringing out new dedicated APSC lenses!

The R10 is both ugly and huge!

Just my 2p
 
Last edited:
Seriously. I shoot Fujifilm now but used to shoot Canon APSC and would have stayed on board if they had a m/less camera that had both an EVF AND a silent shutter in the M series (they do not.)

Just been looking at the R10 and 18-45mm slow lens by random chance not because I want one or will leave Fujifilm.

Have to say I'd take an M5 or M50 any day over that....

Seems like a step backwards the M range was small, light, good IQ and had some cool lenses like the 22mm F2 and 32mm f1.4... the nice 11-22mm, add maybe a 56mm F1.4....

They should have kept the M line going and kept bringing out new dedicated APSC lenses!
That's trying, at least for a while, to have 4 different mount systems with their own lenses. M and R mirrorless and ff and aps-c dslr systems, which aren't fully cross compatible.
Ah yeah hadn't thought of that, although an M to R adapter may have been possible?
The R10 is both ugly and huge!

Just my 2p
Outside of Fuji, it seems that Sony, Nikon and Canon would like to wean off the aps-c users who like the smaller, lighter and less expensive product lines and shove them into the larger and higher priced ff world.
This is why I stay with Fuji. I was happy enough with Canon EF-S before I had fuji they do a little better than the others especially than Nikon with dedicated APSC lenses like the 10-18, 24mm F2.8, 35mm F2.8 macro etc but they're not quite as attractive as fuji lenses which tend to be at least a stop or two faster

I do understand the logic behind this is APSC users don't need fancy lenses and pros all go FF etc
 
Seriously. I shoot Fujifilm now but used to shoot Canon APSC and would have stayed on board if they had a m/less camera that had both an EVF AND a silent shutter in the M series (they do not.)

Just been looking at the R10 and 18-45mm slow lens by random chance not because I want one or will leave Fujifilm.

Have to say I'd take an M5 or M50 any day over that....

Seems like a step backwards the M range was small, light, good IQ and had some cool lenses like the 22mm F2 and 32mm f1.4... the nice 11-22mm, add maybe a 56mm F1.4....

They should have kept the M line going and kept bringing out new dedicated APSC lenses!
That's trying, at least for a while, to have 4 different mount systems with their own lenses. M and R mirrorless and ff and aps-c dslr systems, which aren't fully cross compatible.
The R10 is both ugly and huge!

Just my 2p
Outside of Fuji, it seems that Sony, Nikon and Canon would like to wean off the aps-c users who like the smaller, lighter and less expensive product lines and shove them into the larger and higher priced ff world.
Still, it's not insanity. T'was annoying if you're a customer wanting to build a "good enough" APS-C system, but seen from Canon's point of view it's business savvy.

Good for Fuji, though.
 
You realise I do not believe a collective whole corporate business is literally clinicily insane? ;)

You gotta read between the lines and be a bit non literal in life sometimes right?

Peace
 
You realise I do not believe a collective whole corporate business is literally clinicily insane? ;)

You gotta read between the lines and be a bit non literal in life sometimes right?

Peace
Or you might weigh your words more carefully — hyperbole and peace don't go well together. Peace on you too ;-)
 
You realise I do not believe a collective whole corporate business is literally clinicily insane? ;)

You gotta read between the lines and be a bit non literal in life sometimes right?

Peace
Or you might weigh your words more carefully
Nah I think most people get that most things aren't written strictly literally.

For example one camera or lens doesn't actually develop a set of lungs and then literally blow another out of a body of water that it is in, yet people still write figuratively
— hyperbole and peace don't go well together.
I wish you amazing peace. See it does go together :)
 
People with taste buy Fujifilm, the rest just buy Canon.

Half of the buyers have been doing that for the last 21 years.
No, Fujifilm has a 6% market share.
Clearer now ?
Sure, you're saying 94% of us have no taste.
And the rest mostly buy Leica stuff, so where exactly does that leave Fujifilm? Truth be told, the only place I see Fujifilm gear is on the internet.
Frankly, that's no surprise - if you spend your entire life on the internet as you do, Rambow, you won't have much of a chance of seeing anything outside of it :-D

Visit any European tourist photo hotspot, and you'll be seeing them a-plenty!
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top