Reverse lense adapter for the EOS (non electronic)

Frímann Freyr Björnsson

Well-known member
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
 
Hi Frimann:

All you need is two lenses and a male to male adaptor ring (to mount one lens backwards), which you can buy almost anywhere! I assume you want this for macro work.
Don.
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
 
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
If it's not the electronic Novaflex and assuming you wish to use an EF lens, how do you plan to stop it down?

Or do you plan to use a manual lens of some kind?

I reversed a 28mm manual Hanimex by epoxying it to a body cap. This lens has a 49mm filter thread and this worked out well, as it would fit in the groove that runs around the body cap and this made for easy centering and glueing.

It doesn't do a bad macro either, for a "rainy day with nothing to do" project lens. :-)
 
for macro work? No I am going to take some self portraits...

;)

but if I use this lense coupler you talk about... I will be using more glass and thus the picture quality will degrade...
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
 
well I´m gona breake the rules a little bit and risk damaging my camera... by removing the lense while the iris is still set.... usually the iris stays in the position....
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
If it's not the electronic Novaflex and assuming you wish to use an
EF lens, how do you plan to stop it down?

Or do you plan to use a manual lens of some kind?

I reversed a 28mm manual Hanimex by epoxying it to a body cap.
This lens has a 49mm filter thread and this worked out well, as it
would fit in the groove that runs around the body cap and this made
for easy centering and glueing.

It doesn't do a bad macro either, for a "rainy day with nothing to
do" project lens. :-)
 
How are you going to focus then, if you have your lens already stopped down. You wont hardly get any light through the stopped down lens.

If you want to go this route you have to get a manual iris lens. You can normally buy a 50 mm 1.8 lens used for no money at all.
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
If it's not the electronic Novaflex and assuming you wish to use an
EF lens, how do you plan to stop it down?

Or do you plan to use a manual lens of some kind?

I reversed a 28mm manual Hanimex by epoxying it to a body cap.
This lens has a 49mm filter thread and this worked out well, as it
would fit in the groove that runs around the body cap and this made
for easy centering and glueing.

It doesn't do a bad macro either, for a "rainy day with nothing to
do" project lens. :-)
--
Kjeld Olesen
http://www.acapixus.dk
 
I did something similar to this. I made my own adapter ring by gluing two stepping rings front to front. This allowed me to screw on a manual lens reversed in front of a telephoto. It gives me about 7:1 magnification.
Here is a picture of my setup:



Hope this helps,
Jake
 
well you truly have a point there...!

Any lense you recommend? I was going to buy the canon 50mm f/1.8, but I don´t think that is a manual iris lense...
If you want to go this route you have to get a manual iris lens.
You can normally buy a 50 mm 1.8 lens used for no money at all.
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
If it's not the electronic Novaflex and assuming you wish to use an
EF lens, how do you plan to stop it down?

Or do you plan to use a manual lens of some kind?

I reversed a 28mm manual Hanimex by epoxying it to a body cap.
This lens has a 49mm filter thread and this worked out well, as it
would fit in the groove that runs around the body cap and this made
for easy centering and glueing.

It doesn't do a bad macro either, for a "rainy day with nothing to
do" project lens. :-)
--
Kjeld Olesen
http://www.acapixus.dk
 
that spiratone... is that a manual iris lense?
I did something similar to this. I made my own adapter ring by
gluing two stepping rings front to front. This allowed me to screw
on a manual lens reversed in front of a telephoto. It gives me
about 7:1 magnification.
Here is a picture of my setup:



Hope this helps,
Jake
 
What lenses to recommend depends entirely on what magnification you are looking to achieve.

If you are looking at less than 1:1 magnification you shouldn't reverse the lans but just add extension tubes - e.g. buy the Kenko set of 3 tubes.

Beyond 1:1 magnification you should reverse the lens, and if you are aiming at the best resolution for the least money I suppose you have to stick to a manual iris 50 mm lens. A reversed wide angle may give you more magnification but due to the construction of normal wide angles it will act like at has a tele-converter and thus reduce resolution.

Overall, I think you should consider looking at the Sigma 50 mm macro lens. It is not terribly expensive, and will give you reasonable magnification, possibly with the little help from the Kenko extension tube set.
Any lense you recommend? I was going to buy the canon 50mm f/1.8,
but I don´t think that is a manual iris lense...
If you want to go this route you have to get a manual iris lens.
You can normally buy a 50 mm 1.8 lens used for no money at all.
Is there a reverse lens adapter for the EOS out there? I know about
the Novoflex one... but it´s a little bit expensive I think...

I don´t mind if it´s non-electric...
If it's not the electronic Novaflex and assuming you wish to use an
EF lens, how do you plan to stop it down?

Or do you plan to use a manual lens of some kind?

I reversed a 28mm manual Hanimex by epoxying it to a body cap.
This lens has a 49mm filter thread and this worked out well, as it
would fit in the groove that runs around the body cap and this made
for easy centering and glueing.

It doesn't do a bad macro either, for a "rainy day with nothing to
do" project lens. :-)
--
Kjeld Olesen
http://www.acapixus.dk
--
Kjeld Olesen
http://www.acapixus.dk
 
I did something similar to this. I made my own adapter ring by
gluing two stepping rings front to front. This allowed me to screw
on a manual lens reversed in front of a telephoto. It gives me
about 7:1 magnification.
Here is a picture of my setup:



Hope this helps,
Jake
I made a similar setup to join two 77mm thread Canon lenses, but the magnification was way too great for what I wanted. Here is a "handheld" shot of my monitor....



After playing with that I built the "body cap reversed lens" (as mentioned earlier)....





This pic is with the above lens.... the 2 red dots represent a distance of around 1-2mm.

 
What lenses to recommend depends entirely on what magnification you
are looking to achieve.

If you are looking at less than 1:1 magnification you shouldn't
reverse the lans but just add extension tubes - e.g. buy the Kenko
set of 3 tubes.

Beyond 1:1 magnification you should reverse the lens, and if you
are aiming at the best resolution for the least money I suppose you
have to stick to a manual iris 50 mm lens. A reversed wide angle
may give you more magnification but due to the construction of
normal wide angles it will act like at has a tele-converter and
thus reduce resolution.
What if I had a 50 mm f1.4 manual lens. It's an old Canon lens. Would this not work?

Dennis
 
I just tried a reversed 50mm lense and a reversed 28mm lense in front of a 300mm lense, and the results I got was stunning, I could make one letter on my keyboard fill the frame....

I got better results using the 28mm, and by better results I mean higher magnification... don't know if the image quality would have been because I just peeked through the viewfinder
What lenses to recommend depends entirely on what magnification you
are looking to achieve.

If you are looking at less than 1:1 magnification you shouldn't
reverse the lans but just add extension tubes - e.g. buy the Kenko
set of 3 tubes.

Beyond 1:1 magnification you should reverse the lens, and if you
are aiming at the best resolution for the least money I suppose you
have to stick to a manual iris 50 mm lens. A reversed wide angle
may give you more magnification but due to the construction of
normal wide angles it will act like at has a tele-converter and
thus reduce resolution.
What if I had a 50 mm f1.4 manual lens. It's an old Canon lens.
Would this not work?

Dennis
 
Hi Frimann:

I tried to tell you this on the first answer to your post, these male to male adaptors can be bought for very little money.
Don.
I got better results using the 28mm, and by better results I mean
higher magnification... don't know if the image quality would have
been because I just peeked through the viewfinder
What lenses to recommend depends entirely on what magnification you
are looking to achieve.

If you are looking at less than 1:1 magnification you shouldn't
reverse the lans but just add extension tubes - e.g. buy the Kenko
set of 3 tubes.

Beyond 1:1 magnification you should reverse the lens, and if you
are aiming at the best resolution for the least money I suppose you
have to stick to a manual iris 50 mm lens. A reversed wide angle
may give you more magnification but due to the construction of
normal wide angles it will act like at has a tele-converter and
thus reduce resolution.
What if I had a 50 mm f1.4 manual lens. It's an old Canon lens.
Would this not work?

Dennis
 
Hi Frimann:
I tried to tell you this on the first answer to your post, these
male to male adaptors can be bought for very little money.
Don.
I did a quick search on B&H for these adapters, but "male to male adapter" just turned up a bunch of cable adapters. Any idea of brands or other ways to track one down?
--
Jeff Peterman
 
Hi Jeff,

Search for "macro coupler" and you will find several models that would fit your lenses.

Mike
Hi Frimann:
I tried to tell you this on the first answer to your post, these
male to male adaptors can be bought for very little money.
Don.
I did a quick search on B&H for these adapters, but "male to male
adapter" just turned up a bunch of cable adapters. Any idea of
brands or other ways to track one down?
--
Jeff Peterman
 
Hi Jeff,

Search for "macro coupler" and you will find several models that
would fit your lenses.
Thanks, I found them (for $8 each). I'll probably get the 52-49 so that I can use my 50mm f1.8 Canon on-camera and an old Olympus 50mm lens. I may get a 52-52 too, so I can use an old Olympus 28mm lens. I'd like to use them with my Canon 28-135 lens on-camera, but I don't see any 72-49 adapters, and doubt I'll find a step-down ring that will work.
--
Jeff Peterman
 
If I add a teleconverter to that setup (a 300mm, a macro coupler and a 28mm reversed) I will get even better results.... but anybody know if the picture quality will be much affected?
Hi Jeff,

Search for "macro coupler" and you will find several models that
would fit your lenses.
Thanks, I found them (for $8 each). I'll probably get the 52-49 so
that I can use my 50mm f1.8 Canon on-camera and an old Olympus 50mm
lens. I may get a 52-52 too, so I can use an old Olympus 28mm lens.
I'd like to use them with my Canon 28-135 lens on-camera, but I
don't see any 72-49 adapters, and doubt I'll find a step-down ring
that will work.
--
Jeff Peterman
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top