Should I feel bad about buying used gear?

Should I feel bad about buying used gear?


  • Total voters
    0
Again, though, older, common lenses are almost always considerably cheaper secondhand than they are new, even if they are still in production. The longer the used channel has to fill up, the lower the used price will go due to increased supply. A fairly new or very uncommon lens is almost always as cheap or cheaper on sale from the manufacturer.
Marketplace 101, all easily understood. I have always been a little wary of used lenses, seeing sample variations online etc, plus the older electronic ones that are no longer available as new worry me with things like focus motors etc. Maybe its just me, but I have never been as comfortable with used electronic lenses as I have been with bodies.

Different story with vintage MF lenses of course.
 
I buy almost all my lenses used and have only had one problem, and that was with a lens that had a known defect that affects many copies as they age, so it might well have happened if I had bought it new. I have been sitting here thinking about it and I honestly cannot remember how much I knew about this problem before I bought the lens and whether it influenced my choice.

I would buy all my lenses new on sale if I could, but the budget often does not permit.
 
Good luck! Unless this was entirely hypothetical.
Nope, see my update post below.
Wow! I really thought this was a thought piece. I did not know that my opinion could possibly play a role in your purchasing decision. With the great weight of that responsibility, I might not have said anything!
I try hard to stay open-minded. I think staying open-minded is one of the things that keeps a person's brain young. I was surprised after the first few posts saying I shouldn't feel guilty at all. But they kept piling up and I really took notice and read every reply. All those single Likes are mine.
But, seriously, I think you made a very wise decision not just to buy used gear but to buy that particular gear. I think you will have a blast with it! I hope you post an impressions thread at some point and share some pics and opinions.
Well, thanks.

Initial impression: The camera FEELS like an SLR in the hand, but doesn't sound/feel like it when I pull the trigger and there's no mirror slap. It's going to take some getting used to.

The images are great; they have that certain something that FF images have, and I just LOVE Nikon's jpegs. I also love their "Active-D Lighting" (Nikon's version of tasteful HDR applied as part of their JPG processing) The images so far look just like those from my dearly departed D610.

The humble 24-50/4-6.3 lens is an amazing performer to me. Reading the reviews, they criticize corner sharpness and it worried me, but for practical purposes, it is sharp and distortion-free right across the frame. I do notice that it sometimes has trouble focusing in low indoor lighting. (I think lowering their dim max. aperture to f/6.3 was a mistake; should've stuck with f/5.6)

I think I'll keep it as a travel lens, even after the 24-120 arrives, as I find I rarely use telephoto in my travels, and the 24-50 is SO light and compact.

I was going to order an FTZ adapter and use my old Tamron 70-300, but my friend offered to buy it for halfway between the offer I got from MPB and what I might get if I ebay it, so it looks like I'll eventually buy the slow Tamron 70-300 to round out the kit. (maybe a mirror telephoto lens later...)
 
What is the main purpose of getting the photo gear? Is it an urge to support some company? Or is it getting the right camera, lenses and accessories which suits your requirements and budget?
See the above UPDATE subthread. It's both, but I wound up going used.
 
Good luck! Unless this was entirely hypothetical.
Nope, see my update post below.
Wow! I really thought this was a thought piece. I did not know that my opinion could possibly play a role in your purchasing decision. With the great weight of that responsibility, I might not have said anything!
I try hard to stay open-minded. I think staying open-minded is one of the things that keeps a person's brain young. I was surprised after the first few posts saying I shouldn't feel guilty at all. But they kept piling up and I really took notice and read every reply. All those single Likes are mine.
But, seriously, I think you made a very wise decision not just to buy used gear but to buy that particular gear. I think you will have a blast with it! I hope you post an impressions thread at some point and share some pics and opinions.
Well, thanks.

Initial impression: The camera FEELS like an SLR in the hand, but doesn't sound/feel like it when I pull the trigger and there's no mirror slap. It's going to take some getting used to.

The images are great; they have that certain something that FF images have, and I just LOVE Nikon's jpegs. I also love their "Active-D Lighting" (Nikon's version of tasteful HDR applied as part of their JPG processing) The images so far look just like those from my dearly departed D610.

The humble 24-50/4-6.3 lens is an amazing performer to me. Reading the reviews, they criticize corner sharpness and it worried me, but for practical purposes, it is sharp and distortion-free right across the frame. I do notice that it sometimes has trouble focusing in low indoor lighting. (I think lowering their dim max. aperture to f/6.3 was a mistake; should've stuck with f/5.6)

I think I'll keep it as a travel lens, even after the 24-120 arrives, as I find I rarely use telephoto in my travels, and the 24-50 is SO light and compact.

I was going to order an FTZ adapter and use my old Tamron 70-300, but my friend offered to buy it for halfway between the offer I got from MPB and what I might get if I ebay it, so it looks like I'll eventually buy the slow Tamron 70-300 to round out the kit. (maybe a mirror telephoto lens later...)
Sounds like the beginning of a beautiful friendship
 
You should never invest emotions towards corporations. It is a waste. It will never be returned. Save your emotions for people.
Ralph
How about the people who lose their jobs when the faceless corporations exit the camera business?
 
You should never invest emotions towards corporations. It is a waste. It will never be returned. Save your emotions for people.
Ralph
How about the people who lose their jobs when the faceless corporations exit the camera business?
For some reason many people look at big businesses and don't think of the human element. Sure many of them make a lot of money, so people dismiss the impact if something bad happens to them, as if it is not people working there but robots instead. I don't get that.
 
You should never invest emotions towards corporations. It is a waste. It will never be returned. Save your emotions for people.
Ralph
How about the people who lose their jobs when the faceless corporations exit the camera business?
Corporations, faceless or otherwise, go under all the time. It's not my responsibility to prop them up. In fact, not buying things made by companies that don't appeal to me for one reason or another, is good negative feedback for that company. Companies are responsible for listening to their customers. Not the other way around.
 
Companies are responsible for listening to their customers. Not the other way around.
This circles around to my initial comment in this thread — those buying second-hand aren’t customers of the manufacturer — at least not in that transaction.

I have no issue with those who shop the used market. However, I’m often surprised at the entitlement. “Fuji [insert your brand here] should… ” “What Nikon needs to do is…” “Why doesn’t Sony make a camera for me?”

They aren’t doing it because you ain‘t buying it.
 
Companies are responsible for listening to their customers. Not the other way around.
This circles around to my initial comment in this thread — those buying second-hand aren’t customers of the manufacturer — at least not in that transaction.

I have no issue with those who shop the used market. However, I’m often surprised at the entitlement. “Fuji [insert your brand here] should… ” “What Nikon needs to do is…” “Why doesn’t Sony make a camera for me?”

They aren’t doing it because you ain‘t buying it.
That doesn't necessarily ring true though. If someone is looking for some specific attributes and says if xxx would make this, there is a good chance that they would buy it if the manufacturer built it. I have a specific design that I wish Nikon would come out with and if they did I would be in line to buy it.
 
How about the people who lose their jobs when the faceless corporations exit the camera business?
They'll probably find jobs in other industries? If the producers of knitting machines scale down their production, should we all start to buy knitting machines just to save jobs? It probably is more sensible to act politically for better employment laws and unemployment benefits.

Yes, compassion with the people working in businesses is a legitimate thing, but feelings and emotions towards corporations as coroporations serve no purpose.
 
Companies are responsible for listening to their customers. Not the other way around.
This circles around to my initial comment in this thread — those buying second-hand aren’t customers of the manufacturer — at least not in that transaction.

I have no issue with those who shop the used market. However, I’m often surprised at the entitlement. “Fuji [insert your brand here] should… ” “What Nikon needs to do is…” “Why doesn’t Sony make a camera for me?”

They aren’t doing it because you ain‘t buying it.
That doesn't necessarily ring true though. If someone is looking for some specific attributes and says if xxx would make this, there is a good chance that they would buy it if the manufacturer built it. I have a specific design that I wish Nikon would come out with and if they did I would be in line to buy it.
I didn’t claim it’s an absolute. I’m comfortable with the generalization.
 
Companies are responsible for listening to their customers. Not the other way around.
This circles around to my initial comment in this thread — those buying second-hand aren’t customers of the manufacturer — at least not in that transaction.

I have no issue with those who shop the used market. However, I’m often surprised at the entitlement. “Fuji [insert your brand here] should… ” “What Nikon needs to do is…” “Why doesn’t Sony make a camera for me?”

They aren’t doing it because you ain‘t buying it.
That doesn't make any sense to me. How could they buy something that hasn't been produced? Plus, these people may actually own cameras they bought new like Nikon d200 and d300 owners who pleaded for an upgrade for years. I object to these statements as well because they imply that a company should narrow down its focus to what one individual needs. A demonstration of narcissism. But, the outside world exists independently of our desires. Unless we actually are employees of a camera company and are responsible for developing the next piece of kit. This sort of belief is common to folks in general, not just camera enthusiasts. When someone criticizes a company or a person for doing something this or that way, It may actually be a good idea to research and find out why that is the case. Rather than spit in the wind.
 
You buy what you need/want within your budget. If that means you buy used, then that's the correct choice. Simple!

David
 
I vote no. If an item is used it means the manufacturer has already received their "cut" from the initial buyer.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top