- Messages
- 15,232
- Solutions
- 17
- Reaction score
- 7,706
SWMBO wants a landline, so we have one despite AT&T being IMO both incompetent and overpriced.My preference is the same. But at my age, I still prefer a landline. (Even if it dies during power outages.)With all those features in one box, IDK if your ISP allows separate devices. I personally prefer a separate cable modem and my own router, which the ISP has no control over and I can update whenever the maker offers new firmware. I don't have VOIP.Jeepers.The router itself can be vulnerable.Do you suggest that an outsider can penetrate a router without some sort of malware download?script kiddies will happily go after any known stale OS versions with defined exploits. The prior poster presumes that his insecure host can safely hide behind the NAT router, but that's not a position I would take with any data or personal information. Nor would I run it on the same network as any other nodes.My guess is that someone using, say, 9front or GNU Hurd is unlikely to have much to fear from the online-criminal community. ;-)
I suppose not, but just to be sure...
https://routersecurity.org/bugs.php
Should I be glad that I have a Motorola gateway (modem/router/VOIP)?
My ISP (Spectrum) supplies an Arris (formerly Motorola) cable modem that's plugged into my router.At the time of the upgrade, I was unable to find a cable modem that met my requirements. Perhaps I didn't look hard enough.
Last edited: