Why do you take photos?

Sourov

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
382
Reaction score
287
Location
Saint Leu, RE
Or, what is the pleasure for you when you take photos?

I know it's a question with a broad range of answers. But, It's a sincere question. Really looking forward to hear your personal opinions.

Have a wonderful weekend.
 
"Been there done that"

South(or was it North?) Tirol, as seen from inside the train.
South(or was it North?) Tirol, as seen from inside the train.
 
And I really don't care about gear and the technical aspect. I simply love catching a moment with someone that is unique to that moment; it can never be reproduced. It's a specific time, place, and thought that's captured in a photograph.
 
I fear that I am not really going to answer the question, but…

… I have noticed there was a line drawn in my photography. Here in France the « lockdown » was more brutal than in the United States. For about two months, the middle of March until the first week in May, we really could not go beyond 1000 meters from our home. The photos from the first morning in May, when it was over, I know which ones they are, exactly. Later, late June 2020, the photos from the viaduct from the mainland to the island of Marken, 20 kilometers east of Amsterdam, I know those ones too, they help me remember.

There is a line in my photography, all the stuff before the spring of 2020, and all the stuff since. The years 2020, 2021, and 2022, they are « post pandemic ».

« Summer photos » too, these are the peak months for photography for me. But the photos are intertwined with the time. Helping me to remember the time.

If it wasn’t for photography, I would be less motivated to get out, go outside, and even more so, travel. If I were just going to go somewhere, and not take any pictures, I would be less motivated, sometimes, to make the journey. But then there are some moments I remember even without a photo. Last weekend, again on the island of Marken, the bus driver said the bus would not start its journey back to Amsterdam for 12 minutes, and so, if I wanted, I could sit outside for a bit. She understood that it would be better than sitting in the bus. I did, and the afternoon sun, early October, shining on my face, with the fresh air all around, I remembered that, even if I have no photos of the moment. But yet, that afternoon trip, I took photos too. The photography gave me some motivation to go, and it was something that I did while there, but the real pleasure was just simply being there.
 
Last edited:
Or, what is the pleasure for you when you take photos?

I know it's a question with a broad range of answers. But, It's a sincere question. Really looking forward to hear your personal opinions.

Have a wonderful weekend.
We photographers are perhaps a little more aware than others of the transience of our brief existence and that of all things around us, and photography is our attempt to hold on to the present a little longer by taking a picture, no matter if quick snapshot, something documentary, masterpieces of beauty, light, color, composition, whatever.

Some say photography is the art of seeing something others don't see, so our pictures could be an attempt to show others what we see and how we see it.
I tend to think the same. However, it could be exactly the opposite: some people have the capacity to see the "beauty" - or whatever deserves a look - and that's why they take pictures.
The better we can do that, the more satisfying it can be. Feels good and fun too!

I just see that you asked why do YOU take photos, well, I guess for me it is a bit of everything mentioned above.

Liewenberger

Posted Oct 8, 22:12 GMT
 
I've been wondering this for some time now, and I have to admit, I couldn't find a satisfying answer 🤔 I'm afraid I am very conformist, I take pics because I have a camera and that's people do 😱

I can't help thinking that a vast majority of photographers are male. Photography could be an unconscious substitute for hunting, an inheritance of ancient times? The pleasure of acquiring an object of desire (a wild animal, a BIF, a good-looking woman). I believe the very words we use are significant: aim, shoot, capture...
 
I get paid.

And on the other hand it broadens my view of live and makes me happier.
 
It's a creative outlet for me. I enjoy the challenge of making one photo that tells the story of a moment. It's also something I can do while in nature. I've enjoyed being in natural places since I was a boy. Whether I'm watching a theatrically lit sunrise, a raptor patromakelling a mountain meadow, or listening to a bull elk bugle through morning mist, I'm enjoying being in that place, in that moment. If I make a photo that conveys what I felt while being there, so much the better.

--
Bill Ferris Photography
Flagstaff, AZ
http://www.billferris.photoshelter.com
 
Last edited:
Snapshots to capture memories (kids, trips, events, etc.), "photos" for the enjoyment of thinking about what I am doing, where I am, and the final product (a photo I might hang on my wall). For me the two are different, for others maybe not, and that is OK also. Peace.
 
Or, what is the pleasure for you when you take photos?

I know it's a question with a broad range of answers. But, It's a sincere question. Really looking forward to hear your personal opinions.

Have a wonderful weekend.
We photographers are perhaps a little more aware than others of the transience of our brief existence and that of all things around us, and photography is our attempt to hold on to the present a little longer by taking a picture, no matter if quick snapshot, something documentary, masterpieces of beauty, light, color, composition, whatever.

Some say photography is the art of seeing something others don't see, so our pictures could be an attempt to show others what we see and how we see it.
I tend to think the same. However, it could be exactly the opposite: some people have the capacity to see the "beauty" - or whatever deserves a look - and that's why they take pictures.
Cerise, perhaps I have expressed myself incorrectly, but it was not my intention to exclude beauty, the capacity of seeing beauty as well as the capacity of making it show in a picture!

Actually I think seeing beauty is probably the main driver for me when it comes to photography, at least when going for a walk here in the forests where I live, trying to show the beauty I see in subjects like landscapes, trees, leaves, flowers, butterflies, mushrooms and such subjects. The 'slow' type of photography I like. And usually nothing wide angle; something in the 90 or105mm range, 180 or a 50-200 is more what I like on my old E-5. Along the lines of 'less can be more'. Then finding a pleasing composition, in the right light, that's what makes me feel good. But 'pixel peeper perfection' is not what I'm after.

The 'icing on the cake' would be capturing the 'essence' of something, e.g. of a landscape! Like a picture of a blooming lavender field, that, when looking at it, makes you smell lavender! Just too bad there are no lavender fields here where I live, lol!

Liewenberger

Posted Oct 9, 13:07 GMT
 
I've been wondering this for some time now, and I have to admit, I couldn't find a satisfying answer 🤔 I'm afraid I am very conformist, I take pics because I have a camera and that's people do 😱

I can't help thinking that a vast majority of photographers are male. Photography could be an unconscious substitute for hunting, an inheritance of ancient times?
An interesting thought!
The pleasure of acquiring an object of desire (a wild animal, a BIF, a good-looking woman). I believe the very words we use are significant: aim, shoot, capture...
Liewenberger

Posted Oct 9, 13:13 GMT
 
I've been wondering this for some time now, and I have to admit, I couldn't find a satisfying answer 🤔 I'm afraid I am very conformist, I take pics because I have a camera and that's people do 😱

I can't help thinking that a vast majority of photographers are male. Photography could be an unconscious substitute for hunting, an inheritance of ancient times? The pleasure of acquiring an object of desire (a wild animal, a BIF, a good-looking woman). I believe the very words we use are significant: aim, shoot, capture...
Liverpudlian pair of young models, speak about their photographer, Model1 says I think he's going to focus, Model2 what, both of us?

:)

Mark_A
 
[../..] Some say photography is the art of seeing something others don't see, so our pictures could be an attempt to show others what we see and how we see it.
I tend to think the same. However, it could be exactly the opposite: some people have the capacity to see the "beauty" - or whatever deserves a look - and that's why they take pictures.
Cerise, perhaps I have expressed myself incorrectly, but it was not my intention to exclude beauty, the capacity of seeing beauty as well as the capacity of making it show in a picture!
No, what you wrote was pretty clear. I just took beauty as an example, as it is IMO what most photographers search for. But it could be any other intent : humour, anger,...
Actually I think seeing beauty is probably the main driver for me when it comes to photography, at least when going for a walk here in the forests where I live, trying to show the beauty I see in subjects like landscapes, trees, leaves, flowers, butterflies, mushrooms and such subjects. The 'slow' type of photography I like. And usually nothing wide angle; something in the 90 or105mm range, 180 or a 50-200 is more what I like on my old E-5. Along the lines of 'less can be more'. Then finding a pleasing composition, in the right light, that's what makes me feel good. But 'pixel peeper perfection' is not what I'm after.

The 'icing on the cake' would be capturing the 'essence' of something, e.g. of a landscape! Like a picture of a blooming lavender field, that, when looking at it, makes you smell lavender! Just too bad there are no lavender fields here where I live, lol!
Lavender fields have been shot ad nauseam. I'm sure you can find something more original in you neighbourhood!

Sorry to be pedantic, but I don't know what is the essence of a landscape. TBH, I believe that landscape have no essence. What counts is the impressions a landscape fosters to us humans. Landscape exists only because we humans look at them... The very term "landscape" if I'm correct was first coined by Germans, landschaft, right? I guess you know that better than me, Schaft has something to do with man - a landscape is land shaped by humans?
Liewenberger

Posted Oct 9, 13:07 GMT
 
I've been wondering this for some time now, and I have to admit, I couldn't find a satisfying answer 🤔 I'm afraid I am very conformist, I take pics because I have a camera and that's people do 😱

I can't help thinking that a vast majority of photographers are male. Photography could be an unconscious substitute for hunting, an inheritance of ancient times? The pleasure of acquiring an object of desire (a wild animal, a BIF, a good-looking woman). I believe the very words we use are significant: aim, shoot, capture...
Liverpudlian pair of young models, speak about their photographer, Model1 says I think he's going to focus, Model2 what, both of us?
Excellent.

Hope he'll be using a full frame with a collapsible zoom... and not a micro 4/3...
 
I am not an artist. if I have any art images, it is coincidental in the 900,000 images I have taken. I am interested in people and what they do in sports and performing arts. In the digital era I have strongly emphasized my interest in photography of lovely ladies (comparatively low image volume however quite enjoyable, particularly if they bring a good sized bottle of their home made wine).
 
Photography is a passion, calling, hobby. I enjoy taking photographs of people, places and things that interest me. I take a camera with me everywhere I go and I enjoy the process.

During the pandemic I spent countless hours reading posts about travel and finding ways to improve the photographic process. I researched new products, techniques, and locations to visit.
 
Two factors involved.

#1 I like technology and I like optical devices.

#2 I like to record holidays and events in my life and the progress of projects at home.

So while enjoying the use of the technology I am creating memories to later look back on with satisfaction as it brings back possibly forgotten moments and places.

In the end as I get way older, it will always be about the memories.
I agree with Guy. For me, cameras have always been a lot of fun just as toys to play with. As for the pictures, mine are simple records of fun times with family and friends, whether that be a birthday, picnic, day trip, vacation, or any other type of outing or event. When I take a camera along, I'm just looking to get a few photos to help me remember people, places, and good times.
 
I can't help thinking that a vast majority of photographers are male. Photography could be an unconscious substitute for hunting, an inheritance of ancient times? The pleasure of acquiring an object of desire (a wild animal, a BIF, a good-looking woman).
No mortal existentialism?

Do you think women suffer less from mortal existentialism...?
Do women really exist outside of men's representations?

Women are on earth to endure pain so it's no big deal 😏
Interesting article. Thanks. However those people interviewed have mundane attitudes about photography. Nothing really new since Barthes...

I have to confess, my folks died when I was still young, I don't have many good memories of childhood and I don't rave when looking at old family images. And I accept the fact that I'm getting old, that I'll be dying sooner or later, I don't need to take pics to overcome this. I don't want my kids to bother looking at old pics of me.

I can understand people who had a nice childhood like to look at old pics, but at the same time, I think it's a kind of self-empathy or nostalgia that say more about the viewer than about the image.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top