Another new OM-1 user

Trevor Carpenter

Forum Pro
Messages
20,279
Solutions
6
Reaction score
22,531
Location
Fareham, UK
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
 
That's great to read. I'm still excited about and happy to use my OM-1. I got out my E-M1.iii for the first time in 3 months today...to use as a web cam with the 8-25. But it worked great, as always.

Joe
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
For me it ended up going much further than just "fun". On a lark after encouraging a friend of mine that shoots sports trying an OM-1 out, since it happened (rare indeed) to be in stock I said to myself what the heck, I'll play with one for a bit. I already had 7 top RF lenses along with a higher rez R5 FF camera system I use for my business.

What I did NOT expect was aside from it being so darned fun to use, that it acted in all manner as a professional tool without fail. The focus capabilities really astonished me as it did my friend. He tried an R5, Z9 and A1 sending them all back. That alone surprised the heck out of me thinking for sure one of those would meet all his needs. Aside from the so called kit (12-40 f2.8 Pro) lens I just had to try out a 40-150 f2.8 Pro lens on it to see just how good it was. Well, long story short that tipped me over the edge. I took my R5 and the OM-1 out over a week of shooting birds and landscapes. The OM-1 won me over so much that I had to realize the R5 package was going to spend far too much time in it's backpack with it's lenses than made sense.

I opted to begin adding more Pro glass to complete my needs from wide to long and sold off all the Canon gear. I've not been sorry one day having done so. It's all paid off now and I have a lens for every occasion and need. My Real Estate, Portrait and Landscape work is all set. So while I NEVER expected this to be the outcome "FUN" indeed factored in in a big way only leading up to the shear performance of the new system taking this to a whole other level.
 
It is weird how much more it is that Olympus cameras have the gadget factor. It's sort of orthogonal to the creation of advanced features, which have clearly been designed for professional use. Maybe it's the way they are presented, often in a menu system and hardware interface that seems to prioritize flexibility over intuition. Some of the features, like Starry Sky, bracketing, HHHR, etc. seem fitting for an offshoot of a medical imaging company. When I use ProCap, I think, "There were definitely some excited nerds behind this."

I have a Panasonic MFT camera, which I enjoy for completely different reasons. I appreciate a certain minimalism and logic in hardware and software design, like the clickable function wheel to switch between exposure parameters. The menu architecture is clearer to me. The interface for changing autofocus region is objectively easier and more flexible. It's all just more of a straightforward experience.

But still I come back to the Olympus cameras more often. It's like their engineering philosophy dominates their product design philosophy just enough to create a device with more puzzle/replay value. It's definitely not for everyone, but it does create superfans.
 
It is weird how much more it is that Olympus cameras have the gadget factor. It's sort of orthogonal to the creation of advanced features, which have clearly been designed for professional use. Maybe it's the way they are presented, often in a menu system and hardware interface that seems to prioritize flexibility over intuition. Some of the features, like Starry Sky, bracketing, HHHR, etc. seem fitting for an offshoot of a medical imaging company. When I use ProCap, I think, "There were definitely some excited nerds behind this."

I have a Panasonic MFT camera, which I enjoy for completely different reasons. I appreciate a certain minimalism and logic in hardware and software design, like the clickable function wheel to switch between exposure parameters. The menu architecture is clearer to me. The interface for changing autofocus region is objectively easier and more flexible. It's all just more of a straightforward experience.

But still I come back to the Olympus cameras more often. It's like their engineering philosophy dominates their product design philosophy just enough to create a device with more puzzle/replay value. It's definitely not for everyone, but it does create superfans.
I've always felt (well, since my first Olympus digital camera in 2004) that they've super obviously been a company with way more engineers than designers. Having an engineer brain myself has always made using their cameras very intuitive, but I can also see why others would be frustrated.

The OM-1 does feel like maybe they actually got a few UI/UX people to take a look and give them some guidance, though there's plenty of room for improvement still.
 
I have two G9's which I used 50/50 for still/video. I am perhaps @72 buying my last camera. I have an original PL100-400, if I was sure that I would not have a mounting problem with it I might choose the OM-1 over the Gh6.

Its a quandary I'm not sure how to solve.
 
I have two G9's which I used 50/50 for still/video. I am perhaps @72 buying my last camera. I have an original PL100-400, if I was sure that I would not have a mounting problem with it I might choose the OM-1 over the Gh6.
Judging from the experiences of most of the people who have used the PL 100-400mm on the OM1, I think you don't need to worry about that. (Trevor, the OP of this thread, being one....)

If you have a good, sharp, copy of the lens, I think you will be just fine on the OM1 with it....

-J
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
funny, when i nail a shot of something i've been after that's what makes me excited, the gear is just a tool, each to their own though, nice lens so enjoy it
 
I have two G9's which I used 50/50 for still/video. I am perhaps @72 buying my last camera. I have an original PL100-400, if I was sure that I would not have a mounting problem with it I might choose the OM-1 over the Gh6.

Its a quandary I'm not sure how to solve.
I have original PL100-400 and it slips on the OM-1 as easily as it did on the G9.
 
It is weird how much more it is that Olympus cameras have the gadget factor. It's sort of orthogonal to the creation of advanced features, which have clearly been designed for professional use. Maybe it's the way they are presented, often in a menu system and hardware interface that seems to prioritize flexibility over intuition. Some of the features, like Starry Sky, bracketing, HHHR, etc. seem fitting for an offshoot of a medical imaging company. When I use ProCap, I think, "There were definitely some excited nerds behind this."

I have a Panasonic MFT camera, which I enjoy for completely different reasons. I appreciate a certain minimalism and logic in hardware and software design, like the clickable function wheel to switch between exposure parameters. The menu architecture is clearer to me. The interface for changing autofocus region is objectively easier and more flexible. It's all just more of a straightforward experience.

But still I come back to the Olympus cameras more often. It's like their engineering philosophy dominates their product design philosophy just enough to create a device with more puzzle/replay value. It's definitely not for everyone, but it does create superfans.
I think the problem with Olympus may be that the designers, engineers, marketeers and accountants all live in different buildings and never speak.
 
I have two G9's which I used 50/50 for still/video. I am perhaps @72 buying my last camera. I have an original PL100-400, if I was sure that I would not have a mounting problem with it I might choose the OM-1 over the Gh6.

Its a quandary I'm not sure how to solve.
I have original PL100-400 and it slips on the OM-1 as easily as it did on the G9.
My Panasonic 100-400 lens is my most used go-to lens for my OM1 and Em1-mk2. It's a wonderful combination.
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
Money, that's the problem. I've tried everything, I've even been to the bank.

"Don't be a fool," they said "put that gun down!"
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
Money, that's the problem. I've tried everything, I've even been to the bank.

"Don't be a fool," they said "put that gun down!"
i had an ingenious idea for a bank robbery.... unfortunately a cultural change made it near impossible to happen
 
My dad is picking up his OM1 today. Definitely a huge upgrade from the EM-1ii I gave him many years ago. He also managed to get most of his birding geezer friends into M43 as well. Olympus stuff has been selling like hot cakes in Beijing for the past year.
 
A birding friend of mine picked up her OM-1 today and then met up with me to guide her through some of the fundamentals of use. Two hours later, I can honestly say, I have never seen anybody so excited when using a camera, OMS have got something right.
For me it ended up going much further than just "fun". On a lark after encouraging a friend of mine that shoots sports trying an OM-1 out, since it happened (rare indeed) to be in stock I said to myself what the heck, I'll play with one for a bit. I already had 7 top RF lenses along with a higher rez R5 FF camera system I use for my business.

What I did NOT expect was aside from it being so darned fun to use, that it acted in all manner as a professional tool without fail. The focus capabilities really astonished me as it did my friend. He tried an R5, Z9 and A1 sending them all back. That alone surprised the heck out of me thinking for sure one of those would meet all his needs. Aside from the so called kit (12-40 f2.8 Pro) lens I just had to try out a 40-150 f2.8 Pro lens on it to see just how good it was. Well, long story short that tipped me over the edge. I took my R5 and the OM-1 out over a week of shooting birds and landscapes. The OM-1 won me over so much that I had to realize the R5 package was going to spend far too much time in it's backpack with it's lenses than made sense.

I opted to begin adding more Pro glass to complete my needs from wide to long and sold off all the Canon gear. I've not been sorry one day having done so. It's all paid off now and I have a lens for every occasion and need. My Real Estate, Portrait and Landscape work is all set. So while I NEVER expected this to be the outcome "FUN" indeed factored in in a big way only leading up to the shear performance of the new system taking this to a whole other level.
So, I am interested, since all cameras have an excellent viewfinder, a shutterbutton, and they make pictures, what exactly makes this 'fun' factor for you?
 
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
I found after getting my OM-1 my previous R5 and lenses were going to spend far too much time in their bag. I sold it all and don't miss it. The OM-1 and Pro lens lineup is far too much fun and I get results which is what I have always been after
 
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
I found after getting my OM-1 my previous R5 and lenses were going to spend far too much time in their bag. I sold it all and don't miss it. The OM-1 and Pro lens lineup is far too much fun and I get results which is what I have always been after
Same here. I am selling my R5 to part fund my new Olympus 150-400 lens and keep the missus happy.

Are you going to add the Olympus 150-400 to your kit?
 
Last edited:
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
I found after getting my OM-1 my previous R5 and lenses were going to spend far too much time in their bag. I sold it all and don't miss it. The OM-1 and Pro lens lineup is far too much fun and I get results which is what I have always been after
Same here. I am selling my R5 to part fund my new Olympus 150-400 lens and keep the missus happy.

Are you going to add the Olympus 150-400 to your kit?
NO WAY! I so thrilled with the 100-400 Oly so far no need to get that crazy. Besides it's a large lens way beyond the 100-400. I don't use it enough to justify that kind of investment, and as I say the 100-400 does everything I'll ever need. Works nicely with my 1.4x TC as well. My copy of the 100-400 is super sharp so no complaints. I sent back a PL100-400 though which wasn't quite as sharp at the long end and problematic in focus accuracy at speed.
 
I have an R5 and the OM1 and get excited using the OM1 over the R5, I really love the camera.

To be honest the most excitement came when I got my Olympus 150-400m F4.5, probably the most excited I have ever been in the hobby!
I found after getting my OM-1 my previous R5 and lenses were going to spend far too much time in their bag. I sold it all and don't miss it. The OM-1 and Pro lens lineup is far too much fun and I get results which is what I have always been after
Same here. I am selling my R5 to part fund my new Olympus 150-400 lens and keep the missus happy.

Are you going to add the Olympus 150-400 to your kit?
NO WAY! I so thrilled with the 100-400 Oly so far no need to get that crazy. Besides it's a large lens way beyond the 100-400. I don't use it enough to justify that kind of investment, and as I say the 100-400 does everything I'll ever need. Works nicely with my 1.4x TC as well. My copy of the 100-400 is super sharp so no complaints. I sent back a PL100-400 though which wasn't quite as sharp at the long end and problematic in focus accuracy at speed.
"Go big or go home" is what I say! :-)
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top