Broken lens mount on 70-200 after ball hit

Tailslol

Leading Member
Messages
766
Reaction score
2,325
Location
Istanbul, TR
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.



cf69b2d692ac452bab0f83b3f72ac0b0.jpg



--
 
It’s too bad the picture isn’t more sharp, but I think I’m seeing the beveled edges at the gap that are the norm for the machining process at the factory. Also this detail is consistent with what Nikon does with the F mount lenses to allow the use of TCs on some lenses but disallow it on others.

I think that the mount may be OK in terms of what metal is supposed to be there and I hope the rest of the lens isn’t damaged from the hit.

--
Wag more; bark less.
 
Last edited:
It’s too bad the picture isn’t more sharp, but I think I’m seeing the beveled edges at the gap that are the norm for the machining process at the factory. Also this detail is consistent with what Nikon does with the F mount lenses to allow the use of TCs on some lenses but disallow it on others.

I think that the mount may be OK in terms of what metal is supposed to be there and I hope the rest of the lens isn’t damaged from the hit.
 
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.

cf69b2d692ac452bab0f83b3f72ac0b0.jpg
I doubt it would, especially if the camera was powered off afterwards, but maybe for good measure, send both in to Nikon. Unfortunately, this would not be covered under warranty I don't think.... so you may be looking at a $300 repair for the mount (estimated, I'm just guessing). And I would also have them check the mount on the camera too (which is why I'm recommending you send both in). If the impact was great enough to break off a metal piece from the mount, it could have also bent the camera's mount too.

--
(NOTE: If I don't reply to a direct comment in the forums, it's likely I unsubscribed from the thread.)
 
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.
Nothing was broken off. The mount on my Z 70-200mm f/2.8 S VR looks exactly the same.

It may still be worth having the camera and lens checked over, if it was a significant impact.
 
What kind of ball?
 
b26b0e2ce76c49aeb2c048ac7a52af03.jpg

The mount is designed like that, here’s a shot of mine .

--
-tj
 
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.

cf69b2d692ac452bab0f83b3f72ac0b0.jpg
Tailslol,

That lens mount is not broken and it is highly unlikely that a volleyball would cause any damage. Use it and if all is well keep on using it.

S
 
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.

cf69b2d692ac452bab0f83b3f72ac0b0.jpg
Tailslol,

That lens mount is not broken and it is highly unlikely that a volleyball would cause any damage. Use it and if all is well keep on using it.

S
Huh? A volleyball isn't a balloon, there could be more than enough kinetic energy to cause damage to a lens or the mount, especially considering the length of this lens.



--
-tj
 
Apparently when the ball hit my 70-200 on Z9, there was some damage. I just saw it today. There's a chunk of metal missing in this section. Now I checked the Z9 and its mount seems pretty much intact. I wonder where that metal piece went. Probably when I took off the lens, it dropped off. Do you think it could have stayed in the camera somehow? I'll go to the Nikon service tomorrow anyway but wanted to check with you.

cf69b2d692ac452bab0f83b3f72ac0b0.jpg
Its the cut out for the TC to slot into. This is so certain lenses can accept the TC's and not other lenses.

--
Lance B
 
Huh? A volleyball isn't a balloon, there could be more than enough kinetic energy to cause damage to a lens or the mount, especially considering the length of this lens.
Even though I agree with your assertion re kinetic energy (I've seen people knocked off their feet by vballs to the head many times) - unless the camera was held very firmly, I doubt that it would cause mount damage. These things are constructed very robustly.
 
It's a good idea to have both the camera and lens checked. The lens mount on the camera is almost certainly bent to some degree.
 
Ok good news, absolutely no damage on lens or camera mount, checked by Nikon service.

So it seems Z9+70-200 can take a volleyball hit. : )
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top