Sony A7IV (eye) autofocus problems - report here

Unfortunately, I don't have anything faster than 1.8.

I'm not sure if this page has been linked here before: (4) Sony A7IV eyeAF issues | Facebook But a number of people (not all) are suggesting that it may indeed be a hardware issue to do with the quality of the Exmor processor. The suggestion is that Sony kept all the good processors for the A1 and had laxer QA requirements for processors going into the A7IV due to the chip shortage. Interestingly--and not mentioned yet in this thread, I believe--there were a few early reports from some A1 users of the same eye AF troubles.

I'm based in Asia and received my pre-ordered unit in mid December ... might be a different batch from the ones that made it to the US and Europe or perhaps I just got lucky. Some people on that page are saying they returned their camera and that their replacement was better. Others found a replacement to be no better. Still a mystery...
Go to your local store and try out the 50GM.
 
It's looking like the last bastions of denialism fall:
After using it for few days, I've started to encounter this weird EyeAf focusing issue, every few shots I had more front focus or back focus than acceptable hits, like 6 out of 10 were miss focused, on eyebrows or nose. That happened on wide aperture from 1.8 to 2.8 even 4. It happened on different focusing zones when eye af was priority. As this wasn't bad enough, the focus box confirmed focus on one eye and to find out that the other eye was more in focus, than the eye that should have been but was not. Seems there are more people encountered this issue, sadly the camera became unreliable for my use.

Response From Sony support team 21/02/2022:

Hi AdrianPhotography,

Thank you for your feedback.
We're sorry to learn that you're experiencing an issue with the EyeAF and there's noise on the pics more than usual.
We're aware of the issue with the EyeAF and our engineers are working on a software update to resolve the issue.
Having read your feedback about the noise, we would like to be able to offer some assistance, so please don't hesitate to contact us using the details here: https://bit.ly/2VBcJwW.

Hana @Sony UK
https://www.sony.ie/electronics/interchangeable-lens-cameras/ilce-7m4/reviews-ratings

If the problem wasn't existent in 100% of cameras there would be not firmware fix for 100% of cameras and instead they'd just repair individual cameras.

The more pressure the less slow the fix will likely come.
Consensus seems to have moved to an understanding that it's NOT 100% of cameras... what I've been saying all along. Some people have received replacement cameras and others have bought multiple bodies, and it seems to be the case that the problem exists to varying degrees with different bodies. In the past few days, the discussion has shifted to how a hardware issue might be at play, or and interaction between faulty hardware (bad Exmor processors) and the firmware. Some comments from the past 3 days:

"I bought two bodies within two days of each other. They both had terrible eye autofocus. I returned them and bought a new body about three weeks later. The difference in serial numbers was about 3,000 digits. I still have the third body and the eye AF is much better than the first two but still not as good as my a7iii"

"I’m so confused what to think anymore. When the camera works, it’s great. I work in the consumer electronics industry, I’m not an engineer so my views are just what I see in my industry. I am starting to think there was a bad batch of hardware, sony is scrambling on what to do and what to say right. During My phone conversation with Sony they told me they were unaware of any issues."

"something is unsyched is the system could it be that not all A7IV have the same chips and maybe the A7IV that has newer chips are running perfect and those that have a problem have old chips that's causing the problem. Using old and new chip in a system can cause it to be unsyched."

"if binned processors or processors which cannot keep up with the real-time analysis of the eye is the case, that could explain the intermittent issue. We could be facing a situation where some chips in some cameras can run the algorithm correctly and others cannot."

"Regardless of whether it is hardware or software, first thing I would try and do is rectify the issue with a software update. For example, if it is down to processing power on some units with lower clock speeds, Sony could release an update where they reduce the sampling rate per second, increase the size of the zones being analysed, make various other tweaks to reduce the intensity of the feature on those lower clocked processors."

etc etc...
 
Unfortunately, I don't have anything faster than 1.8.

I'm not sure if this page has been linked here before: (4) Sony A7IV eyeAF issues | Facebook But a number of people (not all) are suggesting that it may indeed be a hardware issue to do with the quality of the Exmor processor. The suggestion is that Sony kept all the good processors for the A1 and had laxer QA requirements for processors going into the A7IV due to the chip shortage. Interestingly--and not mentioned yet in this thread, I believe--there were a few early reports from some A1 users of the same eye AF troubles.

I'm based in Asia and received my pre-ordered unit in mid December ... might be a different batch from the ones that made it to the US and Europe or perhaps I just got lucky. Some people on that page are saying they returned their camera and that their replacement was better. Others found a replacement to be no better. Still a mystery...
Go to your local store and try out the 50GM.
Except that will cost me $30 in taxi fare and an afternoon of time ... and I'm not experiencing a problem that needs to be fixed. It's pretty clear from the facebook group that some bodies experience the problem more than others (e.g., when the same individual tries multiple bodies and has a different experience).
 
Unfortunately, I don't have anything faster than 1.8.

I'm not sure if this page has been linked here before: (4) Sony A7IV eyeAF issues | Facebook But a number of people (not all) are suggesting that it may indeed be a hardware issue to do with the quality of the Exmor processor. The suggestion is that Sony kept all the good processors for the A1 and had laxer QA requirements for processors going into the A7IV due to the chip shortage. Interestingly--and not mentioned yet in this thread, I believe--there were a few early reports from some A1 users of the same eye AF troubles.

I'm based in Asia and received my pre-ordered unit in mid December ... might be a different batch from the ones that made it to the US and Europe or perhaps I just got lucky. Some people on that page are saying they returned their camera and that their replacement was better. Others found a replacement to be no better. Still a mystery...
Go to your local store and try out the 50GM.
Except that will cost me $30 in taxi fare and an afternoon of time ... and I'm not experiencing a problem that needs to be fixed. It's pretty clear from the facebook group that some bodies experience the problem more than others (e.g., when the same individual tries multiple bodies and has a different experience).
OK.

As an FYI, here's the 50GM at F1.2 and F1.8, Wide AF:

0b5b23cef6024e4094ee583923221c1e.jpg

8d0f6432b424476a9d153c20929dc9de.jpg

--
"Be curious, not judgmental"
-Walt Whitman
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, I don't have anything faster than 1.8.

I'm not sure if this page has been linked here before: (4) Sony A7IV eyeAF issues | Facebook But a number of people (not all) are suggesting that it may indeed be a hardware issue to do with the quality of the Exmor processor. The suggestion is that Sony kept all the good processors for the A1 and had laxer QA requirements for processors going into the A7IV due to the chip shortage. Interestingly--and not mentioned yet in this thread, I believe--there were a few early reports from some A1 users of the same eye AF troubles.

I'm based in Asia and received my pre-ordered unit in mid December ... might be a different batch from the ones that made it to the US and Europe or perhaps I just got lucky. Some people on that page are saying they returned their camera and that their replacement was better. Others found a replacement to be no better. Still a mystery...
Go to your local store and try out the 50GM.
Except that will cost me $30 in taxi fare and an afternoon of time ... and I'm not experiencing a problem that needs to be fixed. It's pretty clear from the facebook group that some bodies experience the problem more than others (e.g., when the same individual tries multiple bodies and has a different experience).
OK.

As an FYI, here's the 50GM at F1.2 and F1.8, Wide AF:

0b5b23cef6024e4094ee583923221c1e.jpg

8d0f6432b424476a9d153c20929dc9de.jpg
Yes, I see the problem is noticeably worse at 1.4, but that doesn’t change the fact that in my shots, the eyebrows are clearly out of focus while the target iris is fine.
 
Hey Docno / anyone

Can you check something on your camera ... I am getting cranky here with this 2nd A7iv body I got :

* Full Face : Eye focus on human (this time Sony 24-105 F4) - Eye are detected

* Two eyes & Nose & Mouth but no chin ... Boom - can't detect human eyes anymore and I need to start changing to animal ...

Animal Eye detect - the square is much much bigger than the human eye detect (like 9 times bigger ... ) - And I am guessing that this "helps" to very reliable front focus ...

I see another return and swap .... LOL

Please tell me if you notice the same - or is it my camera only ...
 
Unfortunately, I don't have anything faster than 1.8.

I'm not sure if this page has been linked here before: (4) Sony A7IV eyeAF issues | Facebook But a number of people (not all) are suggesting that it may indeed be a hardware issue to do with the quality of the Exmor processor. The suggestion is that Sony kept all the good processors for the A1 and had laxer QA requirements for processors going into the A7IV due to the chip shortage. Interestingly--and not mentioned yet in this thread, I believe--there were a few early reports from some A1 users of the same eye AF troubles.

I'm based in Asia and received my pre-ordered unit in mid December ... might be a different batch from the ones that made it to the US and Europe or perhaps I just got lucky. Some people on that page are saying they returned their camera and that their replacement was better. Others found a replacement to be no better. Still a mystery...
Go to your local store and try out the 50GM.
Except that will cost me $30 in taxi fare and an afternoon of time ... and I'm not experiencing a problem that needs to be fixed. It's pretty clear from the facebook group that some bodies experience the problem more than others (e.g., when the same individual tries multiple bodies and has a different experience).
OK.

As an FYI, here's the 50GM at F1.2 and F1.8, Wide AF:

0b5b23cef6024e4094ee583923221c1e.jpg

8d0f6432b424476a9d153c20929dc9de.jpg
Yes, I see the problem is noticeably worse at 1.4, but that doesn’t change the fact that in my shots, the eyebrows are clearly out of focus while the target iris is fine.
I didn't even know I had a problem until I got the Sigma 85mm F1.4. Prior to that I just had the A7C kit lens (F 4-5.6) and the Tamron 28-200 (F 2.8-5.6.). But I've rented a number of Sony lenses and bodies since then, and the results are always similar.

Based on your results and mine at F 1.8, I'm now of the opinion that the problem is an artifact of larger apertures. But if anyone has some counter-examples, please post them.

--
"Be curious, not judgmental"
-Walt Whitman
 
Hey Docno / anyone

Can you check something on your camera ... I am getting cranky here with this 2nd A7iv body I got :

* Full Face : Eye focus on human (this time Sony 24-105 F4) - Eye are detected

* Two eyes & Nose & Mouth but no chin ... Boom - can't detect human eyes anymore and I need to start changing to animal ...

Animal Eye detect - the square is much much bigger than the human eye detect (like 9 times bigger ... ) - And I am guessing that this "helps" to very reliable front focus ...

I see another return and swap .... LOL

Please tell me if you notice the same - or is it my camera only ...
OK, I have that lens. I'll try tomorrow... sun's going down here now, and my subject--oops, wife--is not around at the moment.

To make sure I understand... you frame the face so the mouth can be seen but not the chin? And in that case, the human eye-AF stops working at all, but animal eye-AF still gets the eyes? What focal length were you using ... the long end, I presume?
 
Hey Docno / anyone

Can you check something on your camera ... I am getting cranky here with this 2nd A7iv body I got :

* Full Face : Eye focus on human (this time Sony 24-105 F4) - Eye are detected

* Two eyes & Nose & Mouth but no chin ... Boom - can't detect human eyes anymore and I need to start changing to animal ...

Animal Eye detect - the square is much much bigger than the human eye detect (like 9 times bigger ... ) - And I am guessing that this "helps" to very reliable front focus ...

I see another return and swap .... LOL

Please tell me if you notice the same - or is it my camera only ...
Home lighting. Set focal length to 105mm at f4. I could walk up to where the top of the head and most of the chin was out of frame and still have human eye-AF. It was only when I got past the lower lip that the Eye AF box would disappear or at least become unreliable.



I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF
I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF



I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
 
Hey Docno / anyone

Can you check something on your camera ... I am getting cranky here with this 2nd A7iv body I got :

* Full Face : Eye focus on human (this time Sony 24-105 F4) - Eye are detected

* Two eyes & Nose & Mouth but no chin ... Boom - can't detect human eyes anymore and I need to start changing to animal ...

Animal Eye detect - the square is much much bigger than the human eye detect (like 9 times bigger ... ) - And I am guessing that this "helps" to very reliable front focus ...

I see another return and swap .... LOL

Please tell me if you notice the same - or is it my camera only ...
Home lighting. Set focal length to 105mm at f4. I could walk up to where the top of the head and most of the chin was out of frame and still have human eye-AF. It was only when I got past the lower lip that the Eye AF box would disappear or at least become unreliable.

I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF
I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF

I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
I believe this to be a different issue: I can demonstrate, using a 3rd party app, that at some point the camera no longer recognizes the image as a human face. And at that point, it doesn’t bother looking for eyes.

--
"Be curious, not judgmental"
-Walt Whitman
 
Hey Docno / anyone

Can you check something on your camera ... I am getting cranky here with this 2nd A7iv body I got :

* Full Face : Eye focus on human (this time Sony 24-105 F4) - Eye are detected

* Two eyes & Nose & Mouth but no chin ... Boom - can't detect human eyes anymore and I need to start changing to animal ...

Animal Eye detect - the square is much much bigger than the human eye detect (like 9 times bigger ... ) - And I am guessing that this "helps" to very reliable front focus ...

I see another return and swap .... LOL

Please tell me if you notice the same - or is it my camera only ...
Home lighting. Set focal length to 105mm at f4. I could walk up to where the top of the head and most of the chin was out of frame and still have human eye-AF. It was only when I got past the lower lip that the Eye AF box would disappear or at least become unreliable.

I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF
I was able to get in closer than this and still have Eye AF

I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
I was surprised Eye-AF still worked here, though arguably it's more eyelashes than iris (if you pixel peep)
I believe this to be a different issue: I can demonstrate, using a 3rd party app, that at some point the camera no longer recognizes the image as a human face. And at that point, it doesn’t bother looking for eyes.
Yes, that’s what’s being said. The question is at what point it stops recognising a face. For one poster, it seems to be when the chin is ‘cut off’. I can pretty well get as far as the lower lip before the eye AF stops. Interestingly, it seems the other poster can come in closer if using animal eye AF….
 
Hi

Thanks !

I was holding it in my hands ... selfie ... so actually pretty wide - Let me check again ... 50mm .. this is now day light here .. F4 .. if chin inside .. eyes are detected .. if not chin. .. it will loose it LOL

Change to animal eye .. can detect the eye .. but the focus square is huge
 
Mine is on its way back to Sony as I type, so I will hopefully soon see if sending it in for repair helps. It's a gamble, but I got sick of waiting and seeing some people say they exchanged theirs several times and finally got one that works better pushed me over the edge.
So how did that turn out?

Any surprise luck with a repair?
 
Mine is on its way back to Sony as I type, so I will hopefully soon see if sending it in for repair helps. It's a gamble, but I got sick of waiting and seeing some people say they exchanged theirs several times and finally got one that works better pushed me over the edge.
So how did that turn out?

Any surprise luck with a repair?
Precision camera (in US) says the repair is completed and it is now, for the last week, been in quality assurance evaluation before shipping it back to me. Zero info on what was done, if anything. The repair happened very quickly so I'm wondering if they found nothing wrong and are shipping it back as received. Not sure why the quality assurance part is taking so long. Hoping it comes back working perfectly, but keeping my expectations low to avoid too much disappointment.
 
Mine is on its way back to Sony as I type, so I will hopefully soon see if sending it in for repair helps. It's a gamble, but I got sick of waiting and seeing some people say they exchanged theirs several times and finally got one that works better pushed me over the edge.
So how did that turn out?

Any surprise luck with a repair?
Precision camera (in US) says the repair is completed and it is now, for the last week, been in quality assurance evaluation before shipping it back to me. Zero info on what was done, if anything. The repair happened very quickly so I'm wondering if they found nothing wrong and are shipping it back as received. Not sure why the quality assurance part is taking so long. Hoping it comes back working perfectly, but keeping my expectations low to avoid too much disappointment.
When I sent my A7C to them a few weeks ago, they sent me an itemized list of repairs along with the estimate. They needed a credit card number at that point.
 
Mine is on its way back to Sony as I type, so I will hopefully soon see if sending it in for repair helps. It's a gamble, but I got sick of waiting and seeing some people say they exchanged theirs several times and finally got one that works better pushed me over the edge.
So how did that turn out?

Any surprise luck with a repair?
Precision camera (in US) says the repair is completed and it is now, for the last week, been in quality assurance evaluation before shipping it back to me. Zero info on what was done, if anything. The repair happened very quickly so I'm wondering if they found nothing wrong and are shipping it back as received. Not sure why the quality assurance part is taking so long. Hoping it comes back working perfectly, but keeping my expectations low to avoid too much disappointment.
When I sent my A7C to them a few weeks ago, they sent me an itemized list of repairs along with the estimate. They needed a credit card number at that point.
Sony had me send it there under warranty, so maybe I won't see an itemized list until I receive the camera back from them?
 
I am based in the UK and noticed there are a lot of A7 IVs for sale, used. Could this be the reason
Hardly. The A7IV is a top seller and some buy just to try out.

The eye focus issue mentioned in this thread is a minor issue and only a few are aware that one need an f/1.4 lens, low contrast low light and close focus to get some imagesout of focus. Having strong eyelashes and an iris in shadow helps to bring out the issue.

Have personally not seen the issue but then my brightest lens is a 1.8/85mm lens.

Seems like Sony is aware.
 
The eye focus issue mentioned in this thread is a minor issue and only a few are aware that one need an f/1.4 lens, low contrast low light and close focus to get some imagesout of focus. Having strong eyelashes and an iris in shadow helps to bring out the issue.
Sadly the issue is not only appearing with these conditions you've mentioned. I have had Eye-AF related issues several times with full body portraits (mostly back focus), bright sunlight, studio light, it happens even at F6.3, F4 (dpreview noticed that), F2.8 etc and it's not only a front focus issue, it can switch to back focus in rare (even static) cases as well.

The issue is just easier to take note from closer distances, that's why people are asked to do the test from close distances. For full body portraits if the issue is showing up, there is a huge loss of detail and if you look closely, you can see that the focus is somewhere else like behind the ears or on objects in the foreground. There are good days where most pictures are sharp and there are bad days where most pictures are out of focus.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top