Day Hiker
Forum Pro
I’ve had myPen F since its introduction in 2016. It was the first 20Mp m43 camera. Image quality is excellent, even in 2022. Having an excellent EVF on a Pen camera is/was a big plus. It’s as sexy as a digital camera can be.
But (you may have seen this coming) I never much got along with the built-in color profiles; I always felt I could do better with raw in Lr. I tried using a number of formulas/maps for color grading that various individuals published, such as for Kodachrome 25 and so on. None ever got me to my destination. Early on, I shot an entire vacation using color profile 2 just to see what it could do. While I got very nice jpeg shots, when I went back in wanting to tweak a number of the photos, those 8-bit jpegs bit me when I needed a bit more dynamic range to play with. I regretted not shooting raw (don’t tell me about raw+jpeg six years on…)
The b&w profiles are actually pretty good. My favorite is profile 1. Profile 2 is often likened to Tri-X but I never saw the similarity; Tri-X is better IMO. It’s a good profile nonetheless. Profile 3 is almost like infrared, or b&w with a heavy red filter and shows artifacts around sharp edges; I gave up on it early on.
In the meantime I added an E-M1.2 and then swapped that out for an E-M1.3. As a photographic tool, the E-M1.3 beats the Pen F hands down. Its AF is super-superior, it does far more as a camera, and is easier to use than my Pen F. Now that we all have the OM-1, it’s obvious that the performance/handling gulf of flagship vs. the Pen F is widening. The OM-1 is in my near future.
I fear my Pen F is a dear friend that has outlived her stay at my house. She’s gorgeous and is a very competent image maker. It’s just that the E-M1.3 and OM-1 are pulling far ahead in overall handling and ergonomics. That’s important to me, much more important than more megapickles or increased dynamic range. The value my Pen F holds on the resale market outweighs its value on a pedestal as an object of superb design and desire.
Have any of you tired of your Pen F? Which camera made you relegate your Pen F to occasional duty? E-M1.2? E-M1.3? E-M5.3? E-M10.4? Or ???
James
But (you may have seen this coming) I never much got along with the built-in color profiles; I always felt I could do better with raw in Lr. I tried using a number of formulas/maps for color grading that various individuals published, such as for Kodachrome 25 and so on. None ever got me to my destination. Early on, I shot an entire vacation using color profile 2 just to see what it could do. While I got very nice jpeg shots, when I went back in wanting to tweak a number of the photos, those 8-bit jpegs bit me when I needed a bit more dynamic range to play with. I regretted not shooting raw (don’t tell me about raw+jpeg six years on…)
The b&w profiles are actually pretty good. My favorite is profile 1. Profile 2 is often likened to Tri-X but I never saw the similarity; Tri-X is better IMO. It’s a good profile nonetheless. Profile 3 is almost like infrared, or b&w with a heavy red filter and shows artifacts around sharp edges; I gave up on it early on.
In the meantime I added an E-M1.2 and then swapped that out for an E-M1.3. As a photographic tool, the E-M1.3 beats the Pen F hands down. Its AF is super-superior, it does far more as a camera, and is easier to use than my Pen F. Now that we all have the OM-1, it’s obvious that the performance/handling gulf of flagship vs. the Pen F is widening. The OM-1 is in my near future.
I fear my Pen F is a dear friend that has outlived her stay at my house. She’s gorgeous and is a very competent image maker. It’s just that the E-M1.3 and OM-1 are pulling far ahead in overall handling and ergonomics. That’s important to me, much more important than more megapickles or increased dynamic range. The value my Pen F holds on the resale market outweighs its value on a pedestal as an object of superb design and desire.
Have any of you tired of your Pen F? Which camera made you relegate your Pen F to occasional duty? E-M1.2? E-M1.3? E-M5.3? E-M10.4? Or ???
James
