Which OM-1 spec is closest to your "wow"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raist3d
  • Start date Start date

Which OM-1 spec is closest to your "wow"


  • Total voters
    0
Although I voted for the 1,000+ focus points, what would really roll my socks down would be if some of the computational Scene modes from the my E-M5 III would be included, specifically the in-camera Panorama and Handheld Starlight.
I am probably quipping but to note: for handheld starlight you mean the EM1MKIII? I don't think the EM5.3 has that. Actually the EM5.3 doesn't have the panorama either (EM10MKIV, EP7 do).

I def. expect it to include the handheld start light because the EM1MKIII had it. I wouldn't be surprised they add panorama since the low end has it.
The Quad sensor and faster readout should make these even better for alignment and reducing subject movement. The higher ISO ceiling might even get the Starlight max ISO above 12,800 which would increase the shutter speed and eliminate some ghosting.
I def. want to see how qualified this ISO is (i.e any constraints or is it just marketing).
We already have a gazillion Art selections under the picture mode on the SCP a couple more wouldn’t hurt .
 
For fun & talk: Which of the leaked OM-1 specs is closest to your "wow"

https://www.43rumors.com/full-om-1-camera-specs-leaked/

Remember we are still in rumor realm. Maybe this is it, (sure looks like it), but it's not set in stone until announced next Tuesday and can change.
Wow! 7 stop IBIS with any lens!!! A supercharge for the 40150 f2.8!
I would imagine the number of stops will vary with lens but basically that it could get to 7 stops withoyught requiring "IBIS sync" with those lenses that do have that. Definitively something to wait to see if it's like that, but seems like a possible progression of the IBIS tech.
 
Nothing really, but that doesn’t mean it is not an interesting camera. But wow for me means something I haven’t seen before either to Olympus or other manufacturers. So yes it’s a nice OMD-EM1 improvement but nothing wow that deserves such a high price in my opinion. Do I want one? Of course! Will I buy one? Not at this price level… I may settle with a used humble M1.3…
I think if they play the higher ISO right, even with constraints if those are reasonable, that would make the wow for me if it can be used in a wide range of situations.

But yeah, stuff like AF as nice as it could be, I think that's just natural progression/expected.
 
Although I voted for the 1,000+ focus points, what would really roll my socks down would be if some of the computational Scene modes from the my E-M5 III would be included, specifically the in-camera Panorama and Handheld Starlight.
I am probably quipping but to note: for handheld starlight you mean the EM1MKIII? I don't think the EM5.3 has that. Actually the EM5.3 doesn't have the panorama either (EM10MKIV, EP7 do
My E-M5 III has all of the Scene modes that my E-M10 IV has … except for the in-camera Panos. Handheld starlight works great on the E-M5 III.


Handheld Starlight at ISO 12,800, E-M5 III, 12-45 f/4

I def. expect it to include the handheld start light because the EM1MKIII had it. I wouldn't be surprised they add panorama since the low end has it.
Not sure about your E-M1 III, but mine doesn’t have any Scene modes in it, and not Handheld Starlight…. at least I’ve never found them
The Quad sensor and faster readout should make these even better for alignment and reducing subject movement. The higher ISO ceiling might even get the Starlight max ISO above 12,800 which would increase the shutter speed and eliminate some ghosting.
I def. want to see how qualified this ISO is (i.e any constraints or is it just marketing).
We already have a gazillion Art selections under the picture mode on the SCP a couple more wouldn’t hurt .
 
For fun & talk: Which of the leaked OM-1 specs is closest to your "wow"

https://www.43rumors.com/full-om-1-camera-specs-leaked/

Remember we are still in rumor realm. Maybe this is it, (sure looks like it), but it's not set in stone until announced next Tuesday and can change.
Wow! 7 stop IBIS with any lens!!! A supercharge for the 40150 f2.8!
I would imagine the number of stops will vary with lens
I disagree based upon the leaked photo of the new 40150 f4 which has no discernible IS
but basically that it could get to 7 stops withoyught requiring "IBIS sync"
the EM1 III already offers 7.5 stops with sync IS
with those lenses that do have that. Definitively something to wait to see if it's like that, but seems like a possible progression of the IBIS tech.

--
Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - Apparently Selwyn Duke and not George Orwell
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
 
Although I voted for the 1,000+ focus points, what would really roll my socks down would be if some of the computational Scene modes from the my E-M5 III would be included, specifically the in-camera Panorama and Handheld Starlight.
I am probably quipping but to note: for handheld starlight you mean the EM1MKIII?
don't think the EM5.3 has that.
the 5’s and the the original EM1 have scene modes while the em1 iii has starry sky af something quite different
Actually the EM5.3 doesn't have the panorama either (EM10MKIV, EP7 do).

I def. expect it to include the handheld start light because the EM1MKIII had it. I wouldn't be surprised they add panorama since the low end has it.
The Quad sensor and faster readout should make these even better for alignment and reducing subject movement. The higher ISO ceiling might even get the Starlight max ISO above 12,800 which would increase the shutter speed and eliminate some ghosting.
I def. want to see how qualified this ISO is (i.e any constraints or is it just marketing).
We already have a gazillion Art selections under the picture mode on the SCP a couple more wouldn’t hurt .
--
Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - Apparently Selwyn Duke and not George Orwell
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
No clue, I don't do the Starry Sky....I sleep at night. :-D
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
No clue, I don't do the Starry Sky....I sleep at night. :-D
Could you just check on your camera? I’d be ever so grateful
 
the 1/300 sec flash sync electronic shutter mode :-) its not even mentioned on any spec sheet so im a little suss about any specs leaked. as it a major feature of the A1
"Synchronization speed 1/250 sec."

Most likely 1/100 electronic...
if its a stacked m43 sensor it should be around 1/300 sec :-) as the A1 is 1/200
I am no sure one can reach such conclusion just becauase it's a stacked sensor.
dont you think its a little weird that the electronic shutter sync is not even mentioned in the so called leaked specs ? because thats a dead givaway as to the sensor used.

Ds
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
No clue, I don't do the Starry Sky....I sleep at night. :-D
Could you just check on your camera? I’d be ever so grateful
Focus stacking worked with Starry Sky, both for speed and accuracy setting.
 
I am interested most to see how the faster sensor readout etc can speed up the pixel shift tricks. Though I am probably more interested in the GH6 for its video features interesting times :-) I am overdue a new m43 body

--
Jim Stirling:
It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true” Russell
Feel free to tinker with any photos I post
 
Last edited:
If the EVF magnification spec is accurate, I can't wait to try one. Using the original OM-1 spoiled me forever for viewfinders...large and bright.
 
I’d like to see them build in a few extra smaller sensors with fixed focal length lenses attached just like the iPhone and Pixel. Both phones shoot multiple sensors at the same time and combine the results. Doing this with a micro four thirds sensor would allow for a lot more computational stuff.

For example, have one of the smaller sensors have an ultrawide that shoots at a shutter speed quicker than the main ILC. If the camera detects a blurry face in a photo it can swap out the blurry face with one taken from the ultrawide.

Heaps of benefits for other things too - like HDR and dynamic range benefits, and probably faster and more accurate HHHR.

One other thing that would wow me would be a camera that isn’t black, and maybe some lenses that aren’t black. Add some colour - that would be wow.
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
No clue, I don't do the Starry Sky....I sleep at night. :-D
Could you just check on your camera? I’d be ever so grateful
Just tried it on mine and it seems you can combine them.
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
Hmmm…. I do similar venues as you lay out, except no groups. I find that at a minimum the HiRez features of my E-M1 III is a real benefit, particularly the Hand Held Hi Rez for lowlight interiors, and cityscapes. I won’t worry a bit about not getting 24 mpx when I can get 50 mpx hand held and noise free.
Gary, can you use focus stacking in conjunction with starry sky af on your EM1 iii?
No clue, I don't do the Starry Sky....I sleep at night. :-D
Could you just check on your camera? I’d be ever so grateful
Focus stacking worked with Starry Sky, both for speed and accuracy setting.
Many thanks
 
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
A 20% boost in resolution will give you only 9% more pixels in linear dimension (print or screen). So, IMO, 30MP would be a meaningful step up in resolution (20% increase in linear dimension).

For landscape, LiveND will give you similar DR as with full-frame sensors. I hope that the new sensor improves LiveND usability.
 
Last edited:
All these super high specs are all well and good but they do not mean too much to the 'general photographer' ... which, dare I say, is most of us whether some know it or not !.

I, like most (many), do not do (much) sports or video ... the state of play as it stands is quite good enough for me.

99% of my photography is landscape, cityscape, groups of people and interiors.

A 20% boost in pixels to 24Mp, would mean more to me. Similarly, manufacturer targeted better dynamic range and shadow performance at High ISOs would be wonderful.

Right now, I'm picking up Nikon or Fuji to cover that. For weight, size and price, I would like to go back to u4/3rds ... not sure that will ever be possible. Pity.

FWIW.
A 20% boost in resolution will give you only 9% more pixels in linear dimension (print or screen). So, IMO, 30MP would be a meaningful step up in resolution (20% increase in linear dimension).
I agree the Sony 1" sensor which has half the area of m43 also has 20mp and at low ISO the results are very good. At high ISO, higher MP sensors when output at the same size have very similar noise performance . A lower true base ISO would be better as well

For landscape, LiveND will give you similar DR as with full-frame sensors. I hope that the new sensor improves LiveND usability.
Most of us landscape guys already have ND filters :-) If they can speed up the pixel shift imagery significantly that could be a huge advantage
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top