What's wrong with Silver Plastic??!!

I dissected my DREB last night for sh*ts and giggles. After
carefully stripping away the silver plastic casing I exposed a
black plastic case. I then got out the high speed calverium saw
and got down to the dirty work. I gently cut thru the plastic body
to reveal the vicera. Opon entering the central cavity I carefully
dissected out the Digic processor and the exqusite sensor, all of
the guts if you will. I found all of the internal organs a nice
pretty pinkish color much like the same color of a human
dissection. It was then that I discoverd that just like humans, it
doesn't matter what color the skin is.....we are all pink on the
inside. In fact I ALSO discovered that the vicera "guts" of the
300D were EXACTLY the same as the D10.....what a revelation! The
same "guts" as the D10 but $500 cheaper and WITH A LENS! I will
have to confer now with my esteamed colleagues.
--
Tanglefoot47
 
Then I guess Dave didn't really read the intial thread he was
posting to. The person was saying there was no way to delete or
edit a post, consequently it isn't a post until it is posted.
--

Mike, I can see where you are coming from, but then by the same token the editor of a newspaper wouldn't be editing the newspaper because it isn't a newspaper until it is published?

Don't get me wrong, I get what you are saying and I am myself all for the ability to alter your own posted messages, which as far as I know is not currently possible on DPReview.

I realise I am just interpreting it differently and can completely understand how it could be read another way.

--
Johann
http://www.therealting.com/photos
 
Is there an example where it actually happens? The silver body of
the DR is matte though, so it doesn't reflect light as much as
other metallic silver bodies, and I haven't heard of anyone
complaining about it despite shiny metal bodies being all a rage
now. It would be interesting to to see how it might happen though.
I don't have a photo to demonstrate, but on top of my head, it might happen if you are shooting through a glass window during a sunny day. Normally because the room is darker than the outside, no reflections will occured on the glass, but once you walk close to the window, the sun will shine direct onto the camera. A silver camera will cast a reflection on the glass.

I think even eos300d will cast a reflection in this case. For testing purpose, I've put a grey fabric and a black chair next to each other, and the grey fabric cast a clear reflection whereas the reflection of the black chair is barely visible. I would think 300d is more reflective than grey fabric.

But maybe this is only a problem of super strong sunlight here in Australia.
 
Let me set the record straight. Corvette body panels have not been
made of fiberglass for decades.
decades? the last time I checked it was in 2000 and it was still fiber glass. since when? what decade?

They are plastic. Now to the
firearms. All Glocks use metal slides and barrels mated to plastic
frames. These guns are recognized as among the most durable and
reliable semiautos in existence. I've seen demonstrations where
they drop them off 5-story buildings, run them over with tanks,
fire them underwater, etc., and they continue to function. Keep in
mind that not all plastics are the same, just like metal. They
come in many different flavors and costs and I have no idea what
characteristics the 300D plastic has.
real guns are not made of plastic either.
I guess you never heard of the Glock.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com
c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND,
Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
While you might think silver looks pretty to your eye (which is
perfectly valid). There're reasons why pro use/like black metal.
It got more to do with function than looks.

When you photographing shiny surfaces, silver has a higher chance
of forming an annoying reflection on the surface, which is
undesirable most of the time. Whereas black is a lot less
reflective, and reduce the chance of something like that happening.

cracks on the body is more unforgiving than you think. Because the
prime function of the body is to act as a light tight box. If you
have cracks, it can stuff up your photograph easily. Metal can be
dent without producing cracks, while plastic can't, it will just
crack.
--
http://tkis.com/wild-mike/

It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer -- Albert Einstein
 
then buy the 828...it will probably a good camera. Not a DSLR and limited to 200mm but hey...you get what you pay for.

If you buy a camera just for the look of it..can you tell me what car you drive? I am pretty much willing to bet it's an ugly square box..or is it a slylish pretty car?

have you seen the photos from the 300D? now have you seen the photos from the 828? hmm ..I'll take the plastic body anytime if the metal body produce such [email protected] were cr@p big time.
because black metal looks and feels much better than wanna-be metal
silver plastix toys'r'us kinda cr@p...

would never buy 300D just because of the plastic feel and Rebel
name (and some missing features)
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
It is light and small for a DSLR..that is very important. new technology in material permit to have lighter equipement...you have to fallow the progress..

Fiew people here dropped their 300d and it was not cracked nor broken after that fall...that does not mean that because it is plastic it is cheap. it is just lighter and easier. I am very pleased that I can carry it all day and would not change it for a heavier camera. Of course if you don't do much hiking or exercice..you cannot appreciate this.

But anyway..I think you missed the point..or are you superficial to that extend? The most important in buying a camera is the image quality and that it will do what you need for your type of photography.

The 300D takes excellent photos with superb image quality. It can take lenses of very powerful zoom..and with it I can have a 800mm of zoom power if I wish. I can focus on a flying bird and catch it in less time that it has to flip its wings and be gone...so I will not loose those shots any longer.

There is more involved then "look"...a very superficial and nonsense way of evaluating a camera.
because black metal looks and feels much better than wanna-be metal
silver plastix toys'r'us kinda cr@p...

would never buy 300D just because of the plastic feel and Rebel
name (and some missing features)
--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
http://max-fun.fotopic.net
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
While you might think silver looks pretty to your eye (which is
perfectly valid). There're reasons why pro use/like black metal.
It got more to do with function than looks.

When you photographing shiny surfaces, silver has a higher chance
of forming an annoying reflection on the surface, which is
undesirable most of the time. Whereas black is a lot less
reflective, and reduce the chance of something like that happening.
what???? what are you talking about? the lens does not pickup the color nor the reflection of the body.
cracks on the body is more unforgiving than you think. Because the
prime function of the body is to act as a light tight box. If you
have cracks, it can stuff up your photograph easily. Metal can be
dent without producing cracks, while plastic can't, it will just
crack.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
oh..that explain why a black camera does not show up in a mirror and a silver does....
I can buy that,
but how whould you then explain the white color of Canon L lens...(?!)
I don't know for sure, as I didn't design them :)

But I think the white lens only come in big lens intended for
telephoto, which meant chance of reflection from objects in a long
distance away is minimal if there's possibility of any at all. ie
reflection doesn't come into play here. And because these lens are
mostly used for outdoor, white (less heat obsortion) would be nice.
note, I have yet to see a silver lense, I guess that can easily
blind you under strong sun light.
(the silver bit is only my guess)
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
Is there an example where it actually happens? The silver body of
the DR is matte though, so it doesn't reflect light as much as
other metallic silver bodies, and I haven't heard of anyone
complaining about it despite shiny metal bodies being all a rage
now. It would be interesting to to see how it might happen though.
I don't have a photo to demonstrate, but on top of my head, it
might happen if you are shooting through a glass window during a
sunny day. Normally because the room is darker than the outside,
no reflections will occured on the glass, but once you walk close
to the window, the sun will shine direct onto the camera. A silver
camera will cast a reflection on the glass.
since when pros shoot through windows ? but anyway, you can use a polarizer filter to eliminate the reflection on the glass..works fine.
I think even eos300d will cast a reflection in this case. For
testing purpose, I've put a grey fabric and a black chair next to
each other, and the grey fabric cast a clear reflection whereas the
reflection of the black chair is barely visible. I would think
300d is more reflective than grey fabric.

But maybe this is only a problem of super strong sunlight here in
Australia.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
reflected in the lens....I am very curious to see this. I have been at the zoo and shooted through glass...I could see the reflection and of course my blond hair and my hands...but with the polarizer filter that is gone.

I shooted in the bright sun here in California..and I beleive that the sun here is as strong as other places in the world..and never had any reflection in my photos from the body of the camera.
While you might think silver looks pretty to your eye (which is
perfectly valid). There're reasons why pro use/like black metal.
It got more to do with function than looks.

When you photographing shiny surfaces, silver has a higher chance
of forming an annoying reflection on the surface, which is
undesirable most of the time. Whereas black is a lot less
reflective, and reduce the chance of something like that happening.

cracks on the body is more unforgiving than you think. Because the
prime function of the body is to act as a light tight box. If you
have cracks, it can stuff up your photograph easily. Metal can be
dent without producing cracks, while plastic can't, it will just
crack.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com

c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND, Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
Just like the 300D plastic case, the glock's also have a plastic case. The 300D is not all plastic.
real guns are not made of plastic either.
I guess you never heard of the Glock.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com
c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND,
Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
--
http://tkis.com/wild-mike/

It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer -- Albert Einstein
 
I quoted the word "respect" in an effort to let the reader make their own inference. By that, I simply mean that the guy carrying the extreme example will, rightly or wrongly, be viewed and held in a different light -- usually a light that casts him as experienced or expert, and accomodation being made for him.

I'm not saying it's right or wrong, good or bad -- it's simply my observation both in the position of the guy carrying a good part of the "extreme example" and as a third party carrying nothing at all, but simply watching same.

A similar phenomenon occurs in my HAM radio activities. My HAM radio club often volunteers to provide communications for marathons, fun runs, bicycle tours (like the MS-150) and other public service events. We have no decision making authority -- we simply provide a radio link between officials and other official personnel spread out across these events.

We carry hand-held two way VHF/UHF radios (and two way car radios) as our tool-in-trade and have our own efficient lingo. Like the photographer carrying a "professional" looking camera rig, we too, are perceiived by the public as having some "authority" either in command decision (we don't) or simply as a source of information (true) and therefore earn the "respect" of the non-officiating participants.

That "respect" can translate into getting people to do things for you. Not that we do that -- but because we appear to "fit the role" that is held as authoritative in this context, we stand out.

Again, these are just my observations from being a HAM and photographer for many years.
  • Robert
Which guy, right or wrong in the eyes of the civilians (99% of the
population), will be viewed with more "respect"?
Hmmm, who respects photographers? I like photography as a hobby and
do make money at it, but I would not want to be mistaken for a
professional photographer. I would much rather be noticed for what
I actually am or not get noticed at all.

--
http://tkis.com/wild-mike/

It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems
longer -- Albert Einstein
--
http://www.pbase.com/digirob
 
I keep reading about complains regarding the build quality of the
300D. And I just want to ask... wat's up with that?

Does a camera have to be made of metal to be good? Even if it is
made of metal, will you throw it around anyhow? Someone dropped the
DRebel down some stairs and it survived. Is that strong enough
build? Let's say the metal body can survive a greater drop, but
your lens and whatever mechanics inside the camera won't!

And then there's the colour thing. What's wrong with silver? Does
being black make a camera better? I quite like the silver colour
actually; at least it doesn't make the camera look like some
antique from the days of yore. You know, if the 300D came in white
to match the L lenses, then maybe people will like it better.

I think people who are used to the old metallic SLRs may not be
used to the 300D, but that's no reason to say that it's one of its
weak points. In fact, being made of plastic makes it lighter and
becomes one of its greatest advantages!

Sorry of the rant, but it's getting late and my experiments didn't
work :(

--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
http://max-fun.fotopic.net
--
Mats N

EOS600/EOS300D/EF-S18-55/EF24-85/EF70-200.4L/EOSIX/KonicaAutoreflexTCwHexanon40mmF1,8/CanonetQL17/RicohFF1s

Only fault is that the 300D silver finish is ugly and way too slippery, nothing else!

It could have been black and not so slippery as it is now, or maybe a dark grey color, just not this shiny silver.

Plastic is OK, since it helps get this "nice" price, but I´m sure(!) that the silver color is not any cheaper than grey or black, 100% sure on that!!!

Maybe the "simple" people Canon intend the 300D for, do like silver better, as a group, globally speaking??? Canon might have made some marketing research including preferred colors in the " estimated" buyer group they aimed the 300D for ...???

Well, I´m "simple" (in Canon´s view...) since I did buy the 300D, but I DO differ(?) in the color taste, and don´t like it in silver.

It didn´t hinder the purchase, though...since the thing´s PERFORMANCE is way more important, and I do know it performs pretty well, having tried it before purchase.

Mats in Sweden
 
If you can, you'll be able to see the camera reflected in the glass, including your hands and your body that will not be black.

I'd agree if you said the glare from a shiny reflective surface will affect your shot, but the 300D is not that reflective, and will not be as reflective as a white L lens.

Besides, when will a pro get caught taking images like that.
Is there an example where it actually happens? The silver body of
the DR is matte though, so it doesn't reflect light as much as
other metallic silver bodies, and I haven't heard of anyone
complaining about it despite shiny metal bodies being all a rage
now. It would be interesting to to see how it might happen though.
I don't have a photo to demonstrate, but on top of my head, it
might happen if you are shooting through a glass window during a
sunny day. Normally because the room is darker than the outside,
no reflections will occured on the glass, but once you walk close
to the window, the sun will shine direct onto the camera. A silver
camera will cast a reflection on the glass.

I think even eos300d will cast a reflection in this case. For
testing purpose, I've put a grey fabric and a black chair next to
each other, and the grey fabric cast a clear reflection whereas the
reflection of the black chair is barely visible. I would think
300d is more reflective than grey fabric.

But maybe this is only a problem of super strong sunlight here in
Australia.
--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
http://max-fun.fotopic.net
 
You buy the camera for the picture quality. Even if the camera runs against your sensitive aesthetic taste, it doesn't make it any less capable.

Anyway, when you're looking through the viewfinder, you can't see the camera! And that's what we should be doing with the camera!
I keep reading about complains regarding the build quality of the
300D. And I just want to ask... wat's up with that?

Does a camera have to be made of metal to be good? Even if it is
made of metal, will you throw it around anyhow? Someone dropped the
DRebel down some stairs and it survived. Is that strong enough
build? Let's say the metal body can survive a greater drop, but
your lens and whatever mechanics inside the camera won't!

And then there's the colour thing. What's wrong with silver? Does
being black make a camera better? I quite like the silver colour
actually; at least it doesn't make the camera look like some
antique from the days of yore. You know, if the 300D came in white
to match the L lenses, then maybe people will like it better.

I think people who are used to the old metallic SLRs may not be
used to the 300D, but that's no reason to say that it's one of its
weak points. In fact, being made of plastic makes it lighter and
becomes one of its greatest advantages!

Sorry of the rant, but it's getting late and my experiments didn't
work :(

--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
http://max-fun.fotopic.net
--
Mats N

EOS600/EOS300D/EF-S18-55/EF24-85/EF70-200.4L/EOSIX/KonicaAutoreflexTCwHexanon40mmF1,8/CanonetQL17/RicohFF1s

Only fault is that the 300D silver finish is ugly and way too
slippery, nothing else!
It could have been black and not so slippery as it is now, or maybe
a dark grey color, just not this shiny silver.

Plastic is OK, since it helps get this "nice" price, but I´m
sure(!) that the silver color is not any cheaper than grey or
black, 100% sure on that!!!

Maybe the "simple" people Canon intend the 300D for, do like silver
better, as a group, globally speaking??? Canon might have made some
marketing research including preferred colors in the " estimated"
buyer group they aimed the 300D for ...???

Well, I´m "simple" (in Canon´s view...) since I did buy the 300D,
but I DO differ(?) in the color taste, and don´t like it in silver.
It didn´t hinder the purchase, though...since the thing´s
PERFORMANCE is way more important, and I do know it performs pretty
well, having tried it before purchase.

Mats in Sweden
--
The Secret to Life is... Calcium!!
http://max-fun.fotopic.net
 
Yes, decades. Wherever you got your information from in 2000 misinformed you. Go to http://www.corvetteforum.com and ask, if you doubt my word.
Let me set the record straight. Corvette body panels have not been
made of fiberglass for decades.
decades? the last time I checked it was in 2000 and it was still
fiber glass. since when? what decade?

They are plastic. Now to the
firearms. All Glocks use metal slides and barrels mated to plastic
frames. These guns are recognized as among the most durable and
reliable semiautos in existence. I've seen demonstrations where
they drop them off 5-story buildings, run them over with tanks,
fire them underwater, etc., and they continue to function. Keep in
mind that not all plastics are the same, just like metal. They
come in many different flavors and costs and I have no idea what
characteristics the 300D plastic has.
real guns are not made of plastic either.
I guess you never heard of the Glock.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com
c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND,
Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
--
Daniella
main gallery: http://www.infrareddream.com
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
C7OO FORUM: http://www.c700uz.com
c7OOuz, Dimage-7, Tcon14tele, C210tele, Cokin-173, Grad-ND,
Hoya-red-Intensifier, Hoya_R_72.
 
HEHE! That's a nice discount! You know what else you could consider- buy it from Dell.com. I bought mine for $874, no shipping or tax. Now granted, Dell is out of stock a lot on many items, but if you are not in a hurry, it could be worth it. Dell was running a 10% off in their home site and then I found a $25 off $400 coupon. I could have probably gotten it for slightly cheaper, but I can't complain and CompUSA won't get so tired of seeing me! HEHE!!!! Hope you get the 300D soon!!
the people at CompUSA are probably getting tired of seeing
me at the photo section fondling the 300D since I haven't received
mine yet, but hey, I am a customer!
Dont worry, I do that too, but im an employee. I just dont quite
have the money to buy it yet $890 with my discount though. Although
if all possible im going to try to get seares or someone that does
10% price protection to match it, and bribe them into doing so by
buying their REPLACEMENT plan, compusa only does repair plans and
wont touch it if is an LCD problem, they wont give you a new one
either.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top