Rmark
Senior Member
I’d certainly like the “free” 75 mm, and would probably find some uses for it. But it’s sort of a niche lens, could never justify buying one for limited uses.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I can see that. It's a pricey lens relatively speaking. The only way I can see it is if they figure it out as part of a strategy for people to buy more lenses somehow. But yeah, seems odd.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
Maybe they inherited a huge supply of 75s from Oly. I have one of these and while it is optically very good, I never use it. Maybe there's a reason everyone else makes a 85/135 pairing for portrait work. I've never warmed up to the 150 equiv. FL personally. I'm planning on selling mine. In the US it's easy to find used pristine copies for sale at good prices. I think lots of people bought these initially to only discover that while technically it is a superb lens, it's not a generally useful FL.Yes, I can see that. It's a pricey lens relatively speaking. The only way I can see it is if they figure it out as part of a strategy for people to buy more lenses somehow. But yeah, seems odd.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
That's what can cause some level of desperation. Why do it now and with the EP7 with a lens of that value? I am not saying it is desperation but I can't fault the consideration of that either.I mean as suggested buy others, it might be because they can't sell it fast enough. It's an odd focal length for a crop sensor and difficult to use. I do not think it was ever a popular lens. You also probably don't want to sit on product for too long.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
I sure use it occasionally for some of my street work- just speaking for myself.Maybe they inherited a huge supply of 75s from Oly. I have one of these and while it is optically very good, I never use it.Yes, I can see that. It's a pricey lens relatively speaking. The only way I can see it is if they figure it out as part of a strategy for people to buy more lenses somehow. But yeah, seems odd.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
The perspective compression can do better for the face and isolation. Plus the bokeh.Maybe there's a reason everyone else makes a 85/135 pairing for portrait work.
--I've never warmed up to the 150 equiv. FL personally. I'm planning on selling mine. In the US it's easy to find used pristine copies for sale at good prices. I think lots of people bought these initially to only discover that while technically it is a superb lens, it's not a generally useful FL.
I got a Sigma 60 2.8 which I find I like more. Better FL for me. Slower but the optical quality is every bit as good as the 75. Just a personal perspective thing. I've also found I'd rather just use a 70-200 equiv. zoom for anything much over 100mm. Again just me and my style of shooting.I sure use it occasionally for some of my street work.Maybe they inherited a huge supply of 75s from Oly. I have one of these and while it is optically very good, I never use it.Yes, I can see that. It's a pricey lens relatively speaking. The only way I can see it is if they figure it out as part of a strategy for people to buy more lenses somehow. But yeah, seems odd.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
--Maybe there's a reason everyone else makes a 85/135 pairing for portrait work. I've never warmed up to the 150 equiv. FL personally. I'm planning on selling mine. In the US it's easy to find used pristine copies for sale at good prices. I think lots of people bought these initially to only discover that while technically it is a superb lens, it's not a generally useful FL.
I will check and again , not saying it can never be used for portraits but describing this lens as a portrait lens is a HUGE stretchThe examples are there, and they sure look like good portraits to me.
well tell you a very simple way to verify that this is not a portrait lensThat doesn't mean this is *the* portrait lens. From what I see you don't use this for your focal length for portraits, but that doesn't mean it's not one.
maybe this is the problem . things change overtimesAlso my first teacher of photography is a fine arts photographer with years and years of experience in commercial photography so I have to weight that in.
No , don t try me to make me a single case in this instanceSo what I read from this is that for the portraits you do, this isn't the lens for you.
And that's fine.
But that doesn't mean the 75mm is not a portrait lens for a subset of Portrait photography.
I have no idea, maybe because it's the newest camera released? Any one looking at the camera would see the deal probably.That's what can cause some level of desperation. Why do it now and with the EP7 with a lens of that value? I am not saying it is desperation but I can't fault the consideration of that either.I mean as suggested buy others, it might be because they can't sell it fast enough. It's an odd focal length for a crop sensor and difficult to use. I do not think it was ever a popular lens. You also probably don't want to sit on product for too long.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
--
Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell
Can you put a year or a decade behind the "back then"Yes, yes really. That's what my photography teacher taught me about back then with examples. You can also see portrait examples at Olympus OMDS UK's site- they have some nice examples.
I was pleasantly surprised by the measure tone of your answer but by the time I sat to answer it , you had already followed up with a more questionable post :-DOk then, if that's your main job, I will have to take your word for it for what you do, but certainly there's different kind of portraits.That’s downright ridiculous. My main job is to shoot models . And even outdoors shooting the model full length with decors around this , the focal length is TOO tightIt is indeed a portrait lens but on the more pro use side of shooting portraits for models, outside, etc.
Ok what is your definition of portraits but if you look behind my signature , you ll see my instagram account for ledaylight studio where I post images of models several times a weekI'll keep your experience in mind, something for sure to consider. Do you have any example of your work to put more weight to it? I am talking specifically on portraits (see you have a website, didn't readily find portraits but I am sure you must have them given the work I see).
I had to laugh at this one . Don't worry there is nothing wrong with what you wrote . It is just that this word of "environment portraits " which is one of the meaningless bs word created by the people who speak about pictures instead of making then , to name what is simply a composition which integrate some context around the main subjectThanks again.
Update: By the way I looked around some more. I see a lot of environment portraits,
I am sure the 75mm can be a decent match for head and shoulders portraits . But the problem is that it is a tad too long for 90% of users and that now there are better alternatives for tight portraits ... like the Sigma 56mm for examplebut not the kind of portrait I was expecting that the 75mm is a match for. But again, I could easily be missing some work.
I have not shot with a flash or any articficial lighting for at least 25 years . My studio rental does not even have this optionA side comment though- I love what you say about getting daylight light. My favorite kind of lightKudos for pursuing that.
a good option too but for tight portraits the sigma 1.4 /56mm is clearly a better buyI got a Sigma 60 2.8 which I find I like more. Better FL for me. Slower but the optical quality is every bit as good as the 75. Just a personal perspective thing. I've also found I'd rather just use a 70-200 equiv. zoom for anything much over 100mm. Again just me and my style of shooting.
The Sigma is a fraction of the cost of the 75.
The examples are there, and they sure look like good portraits to me.
That doesn't mean this is *the* portrait lens. From what I see you don't use this for your focal length for portraits, but that doesn't mean it's not one.
Also my first teacher of photography is a fine arts photographer with years and years of experience in commercial photography so I have to weight that in. So what I read from this is that for the portraits you do, this isn't the lens for you.
And that's fine.
But that doesn't mean the 75mm is not a portrait lens for a subset of Portrait photography.
sure can .You can shoot a portrait with any lens you likeThe examples are there, and they sure look like good portraits to me.
That doesn't mean this is *the* portrait lens. From what I see you don't use this for your focal length for portraits, but that doesn't mean it's not one.
Also my first teacher of photography is a fine arts photographer with years and years of experience in commercial photography so I have to weight that in. So what I read from this is that for the portraits you do, this isn't the lens for you.
And that's fine.
But that doesn't mean the 75mm is not a portrait lens for a subset of Portrait photography.
My point exactlythe 75mm is a very long lens for indoor use unless you are at a concert or similar
same here , so no argument hereif you do have the space this specific lens is also very performing and not bulky
having said that as go to portrait I use my nocticron and if I need something more compact a sigma 56mm
just read above and again we are in agreement here .i used the 75mm in a video project very nice to shoot details got it second hand and doesn’t get a lot of use but am keeping it despite the very narrow use case
i think it fits the bill I think it’s a good portrait lens I am not saying it is “the” portrait lensI will check and again , not saying it can never be used for portraits but describing this lens as a portrait lens is a HUGE stretchThe examples are there, and they sure look like good portraits to me.
hmm 135mm? That sure is pretty closewell tell you a very simple way to verify that this is not a portrait lensThat doesn't mean this is *the* portrait lens. From what I see you don't use this for your focal length for portraits, but that doesn't mean it's not one.
Look at the other brands of ILC and tell me how many prime lenses you see out there with a focal length of 150mm . Go ahead, I ll wait ;-)
well Fuji has it I’ll check others latereven the popular focal length of 135mm very popular , at least with hobbyists , in the film days has pretty much disappeared as well
maybe I don’t think that invalidates the lens as a portrait lens as much as “nowadays that’s not as much in use for portraits”maybe this is the problem . things change overtimesAlso my first teacher of photography is a fine arts photographer with years and years of experience in commercial photography so I have to weight that in.
Well I am open ears to see the evidenceNo , don t try me to make me a single case in this instanceSo what I read from this is that for the portraits you do, this isn't the lens for you.
And that's fine.
But that doesn't mean the 75mm is not a portrait lens for a subset of Portrait photography.
indont think that’s mutually exclusive to this lens being also and not exclusively a portrait lensfor most people portrait lens means somewhere between 75mm and 90mm for their main portrait lens
and maybe somewhere between 100mm and 120mm for their second portrait focal length
--Harold
--
FOLLOW me on IG @ledaylightstudio.
thedemandingtraveler.org
www.haroldglit.com
IG :thedemandingtraveler
certainly but I don’t think I side is the only place to take portraits I mean it all dependsYou can shoot a portrait with any lens you likeThe examples are there, and they sure look like good portraits to me.
That doesn't mean this is *the* portrait lens. From what I see you don't use this for your focal length for portraits, but that doesn't mean it's not one.
Also my first teacher of photography is a fine arts photographer with years and years of experience in commercial photography so I have to weight that in. So what I read from this is that for the portraits you do, this isn't the lens for you.
And that's fine.
But that doesn't mean the 75mm is not a portrait lens for a subset of Portrait photography.
the 75mm is a very long lens for indoor use unless you are at a concert or similar
if you do have the space this specific lens is also very performing and not bulky
having said that as go to portrait I use my nocticron and if I need something more compact a sigma 56mm
i used the 75mm in a video project very nice to shoot details got it second hand and doesn’t get a lot of use but am keeping it despite the very narrow use case
i posted some outdoor portraits here time ago full body when you have space it works well
thays fine but I don’t think it’s far fetched to consider the other possibility eitherI have no idea, maybe because it's the newest camera released? Any one looking at the camera would see the deal probably.That's what can cause some level of desperation. Why do it now and with the EP7 with a lens of that value? I am not saying it is desperation but I can't fault the consideration of that either.I mean as suggested buy others, it might be because they can't sell it fast enough. It's an odd focal length for a crop sensor and difficult to use. I do not think it was ever a popular lens. You also probably don't want to sit on product for too long.I think I smell desperation. I don't see anyone else giving away a lens that is equal in value to the camera they are bundling it with. Nobody. No other deal out there is even close to that. One has to ask why is such a desperate move needed?
Certainly a good deal for the buyer, but this is so far out of the norm it makes me wonder why OMDS felt the need to do this.
If their goal is to get rid of the lens fast, probably makes sense to pair it with the camera they are promoting currently.
All I'm saying is, it doesn't seem all that odd, given the lens. Remember, the cameras division is not owned by olympus anymore. So if they don't have money to burn on holding stock that isn't moving.
Really ? YOU are lecturing me about " being right". that s hilarious in a way or pathetic .Looks like you are much more interested in “being right” than exploring the subject and correcting mischaracterizations That’s ok
No - I was referring the ones you may be seeing but don’t worry about itReally ? YOU are lecturing me about " being right". that s hilarious in a way or pathetic .Looks like you are much more interested in “being right” than exploring the subject and correcting mischaracterizations That’s ok
can you enlighten us about what mischaracterisations you are supposedly defending ?
Harold