As apsc shooter, for me would be more interesting smaller (and probably cheaper) f2.8-4 version with stabilisation. But in general I'm a fan of non-traditional focal ranges, so standing ovations from my side anyway
They are obviously thinking that having people buy only their brand of lenses is more profitable than selling bodies only and having people buy from 3rd-party.
That 35-150 would be a walkaround dream come true lens.
Maybe managment's mentality is the same as when they were running DSLRs or that canikon is too small to lose profits from their native line up.
Probably yes, if you are OK with size/weight. Personally I see camera+lens setup over roughly 1kg as too heavy for "walkaround" purpose.
I’m interested in the telezoom for sure. It’ll be perfect with my A6600 for outdoor sports. However I’ll wait for the price and reviews because it’s either that lens or the Sigma 135/1.8 ART.
agreed a million times!
Hmm, I've been on both sides of that fence, I'd been kinda lusting after a MILC version of the slower DSLR 35-150 f2.8-4 tho and the range still seems so ideal to me (paired with the 17-28) that I'm willing to give it a try... It would allow me to skip having anything in between altogether which realistically saves on total weight in my bag, just not so much in my hand.
Vaporeware designed to keep you from buying a competing product before the new Tamron becomes available. You don't see too much of this type of advance advertising.
Guess you have missed all the stories about Canon R1/R3 cameras.
Tamron typically makes good on its announcements.
