G1 pictures from Hawaii

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max
  • Start date Start date
M

Max

Guest
Hi, I have put online some snapshots from a few-day trip to Hawaii, made with Canon G1. You are welcome to take a look and criticize: http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~maxim/personal/HI/index.html



There are also a few things I learned that might be useful for those thinking of buying this camera. (This is my first digital camera, I used Canon Elan before.)

1. I regretted saving $200 and getting a 340MB disk and not 1GB. Somehow I clicked more often than I used to, so it filled up in 3 days (writing superfine large JPEGs), and then I repeatedly had to decide which pics to erase while in the jungle (also drains the battery).

2. I now have turned in-camera sharpening off, because photoshop does it better.

3. The camera definitely feels slower and more cumbersome compared to my Elan. But of course it's smaller and lighter and will be with me more often, which is what I was looking for. Also it's great to be able to check the picture immediately and reshoot.

4. An undocumented feature (already mentioned in this forum): exposures > 1s are available only in shutter or manual modes.

5. Many pictures (shot in auto focus and with short enough exposures) turned out out of focus, where autofocus should not have had any problems.

6. Obvious - a pocket-size plastic tripod is much better than nothing.

7. I was amazed how I did not have to adjust any colors in photoshop at all, this is such an improvement from slides on photo-CD. (Of course all my G1 pictures so far were taken in the daylight, nothing really challenging.)

8. The dynamic range of the images is also amazing, compared to film scans I had so far. For example, here is a picture shot in the program mode, all auto, no corrections:

http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~maxim/personal/HI/0284.html

I was surprised to see detail in the black lava rock and in the clouds at the same time (hope your monitor is similar to mine). For most images, the camera recorded more than enough brightness levels to have the freedom to choose the right level range in photoshop.

So in the end, I like this camera for its color accuracy, dynamic depth and f/2.0 aperture, and I hope to get used to its slowness. Hope this is useful for somebody.
 
Beautiful pics!! I assume this was not all done in auto mode?

David
Hi, I have put online some snapshots from a few-day trip to Hawaii,
made with Canon G1. You are welcome to take a look and criticize:
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~maxim/personal/HI/index.html



There are also a few things I learned that might be useful for
those thinking of buying this camera. (This is my first digital
camera, I used Canon Elan before.)

1. I regretted saving $200 and getting a 340MB disk and not 1GB.
Somehow I clicked more often than I used to, so it filled up in 3
days (writing superfine large JPEGs), and then I repeatedly had to
decide which pics to erase while in the jungle (also drains the
battery).

2. I now have turned in-camera sharpening off, because photoshop
does it better.

3. The camera definitely feels slower and more cumbersome compared
to my Elan. But of course it's smaller and lighter and will be with
me more often, which is what I was looking for. Also it's great to
be able to check the picture immediately and reshoot.

4. An undocumented feature (already mentioned in this forum):
exposures > 1s are available only in shutter or manual modes.

5. Many pictures (shot in auto focus and with short enough
exposures) turned out out of focus, where autofocus should not have
had any problems.

6. Obvious - a pocket-size plastic tripod is much better than nothing.

7. I was amazed how I did not have to adjust any colors in
photoshop at all, this is such an improvement from slides on
photo-CD. (Of course all my G1 pictures so far were taken in the
daylight, nothing really challenging.)

8. The dynamic range of the images is also amazing, compared to
film scans I had so far. For example, here is a picture shot in the
program mode, all auto, no corrections:

http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~maxim/personal/HI/0284.html

I was surprised to see detail in the black lava rock and in the
clouds at the same time (hope your monitor is similar to mine). For
most images, the camera recorded more than enough brightness levels
to have the freedom to choose the right level range in photoshop.

So in the end, I like this camera for its color accuracy, dynamic
depth and f/2.0 aperture, and I hope to get used to its slowness.
Hope this is useful for somebody.
 
Yes, the CA between the trees at the top of the photo.... although I doubt just the G1 would have a problem with that very contrasty area.

Travis
Hi, I have put online some snapshots from a few-day trip to Hawaii,
made with Canon G1. You are welcome to take a look and criticize:
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~maxim/personal/HI/index.html
Damn, now I want to go there again! You wouldn't have even had to
tell me you were shooting with a G1. I would have been able to tell
from pictures like the following... any guesses how I can tell? :)

Bryan

 
Yes, the CA between the trees at the top of the photo.... although
I doubt just the G1 would have a problem with that very contrasty
area.
My view may be exotic, but I find that the chromatic aberration may be visually appealing in some places. It helps to see those white spots in the image as sources of light, some kind of a crappy-lens analog of the star-like pattern you see in professional photographs. But yes, the G1 lens is crappy - it also shows glare, a less obvious but more unpleasant problem (in my view, anyway). If you look closely at this image,



you'll notice those large purple areas near the lower-right corner. Of course we've seen many beautiful images in Nat. Geo. with glare put to some artistic uses, but not this kind of glare. I'm going to try a lens adaptor to see if it works as a hood.
 
I assume this was not all done in auto mode?
Thanks. I used program or aperture modes and spot metering most of the time (except when using the remote, I first metered in program, then switched to manual and dialed those values in). In the end I also set exp. comp. to -1/3, not sure it was a good idea though. Then of course there were some minimal photoshop adjustments, crop/levels/resize/unsharp mask.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top