So no honest reviews yet from reliable sources, all we know is the AF is a little better, you can customize it more in some areas and less in others. Buffer is smaller, not good, no noise improvement and WiFi, does not sound so appealing. Now I had a D6 for a few days and sent it back, elected to keep my D5, sell my backup bodies and now buy a second D5, still have a D500 too. I don’t get into a long discussion on why, but I think Nikon is really messing up. Once people like Steve Perry or Thom Hogan, Photography Life review the camera it will be more appealing. There is a lot to like, the AF system is amazing, if not the best in any DSLR ever made. For me though the D5 is already good enough or more, I’m not missing shots and if I do it’s my fault. I don’t like that Nikon is using a faster card, but the buffer is worse, I don’t like that you can’t program certain buttons the way you used to, I don’t like that the D6 still needs an accessory mounted to fire SB-5000s, but those are nitpicks. I think it’s most sad that Nikon is no longer putting cameras like the D6 into professional hands for reviews, it shows that they are either scared of what will be said or they are just incompetent and stuck in the past. These days time matters and although the D6 was announced and released way before the R5 and R6, we still have no honest reviews!