Birddogman
Forum Pro
Good point, Dak.I don't think it is "erasing history" when removing an object of glorification from the place chosen for that purpose. You can still put it in museums and make articles with photographs of them.Very interesting - thanks for posting, David. It sounds like the local authorities got it right by arresting and condemning the "militia" nutjobs. It also sounds like the protests against the statue(s) were peaceful - a good thing.
I firmly believe in the right (duty even) of people to engage in peaceful protest. I get lost instantly when the protests or counter-protests turn violent, like this. Maybe this is wrong, but such actions totally destroy the credibility of the side that becomes violent in my mind; and often make me emotionally side with the opposite position, as is the case with the NM shooting incident. The looting of luxury goods, big screen TV's etc. that followed George Floyd's murder was just wrong and unjustified. In my mind, that rally hurt the otherwise very worthy cause. I wonder how many of the millions of dollars in looted goods went to the benefit of Floyd's family - I'm guessing none.
I struggle a bit with the whole Confederate statute issue, which may not be dissimilar to the NM statue issue. On one hand, we certainly should not glorify those who fought for or espoused discredited causes, whether it was actually for slavery or for so-called "states' rights." On the other hand, if we erase history, aren't we condemned to repeat it?
Sadly, that is true - and scary.You'll not find statues of Hitler in public display in Germany, but that's hardly what is condemning Germany to repeat its history. At the current point of time, it would seem other countries are more eager to repeat Germany's history than Germany is.
Of course not, but seeing General XYZ on his horse in the town square might at least make them understand that there was a history in the place. You do make a good point about the glorification, however. That's way, at the end of the day, and after much thought, I think we should follow Germany's model in this regard.And putting up glorifying statues of Confederate generals in exposed places will serve to make the young people more skeptical about secessionism and slavery?Especially true in today's environment where so few young people seem to have any education in or understanding of history.
Sigh."D-Day is an example of America's 'strong relationship with German government'", Trump State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said comparatively recently. You cannot really expect the average youth to be more educated on history than someone who gets paid to speak for the State Department.I was talking to a young person about D-Day recently (June 6). He asked "Wasn't that when the Japanese invaded the Germans?" Sigh. My real father landed with the 101st Airborne that day and remained a casualty of WWII the rest of his life - one of the reasons I was raised by my grandparents.
Those do look like generic eagles to me, or maybe even Imperial eagles, rather than the iconic **** eagle, but I'm no expert on such matters.The university where I've been studying (click on the link for picture) has an abundance of eagles on its roof. Turns out that quite a few photographs of it are clipped such that they are chiseled off in print. And quite a few of its older professors felt like remnants from the Kaiserzeit.I guess on balance, the best thing is to erase symbols of hate. Having lived in Germany only about 20 years after the end of the war, I was amazed to see that virtually all of the countless symbols of the **** regime had been obliterated - for examples, many buildings had chiseled-off areas where once swastikas and **** eagles had been carved in stone.
That's true. It is a little know bit of local history (probably because it is embarrassing) that many people around here (this is a very German, i.e. PA Dutch area) were ravening supporters of Hitler before the war - the **** uniforms, flags, marches, etc. Once the war actually started, that pretty much ended.It's not just a Trumpian thing. When you think of "Henry Ford", the first thing you think of is cars rather than him funding the wide dissemination of the Antisemitic pamphlet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion . The one thing WWII did for the world is to make it think that antisemitism was a German invention and forget about the contributions of almost every modern country with some form of nationalism.The modern German people seem to be acutely aware of their history and determined not to repeat it. Can we do the same in a Trumpian era?
I agree that the war was not fought to save the Jews from Hitler from the US point of view. There was plenty of anti-Semitism here back then.Unfortunately that makes almost nobody afraid of repeating history in that regard. It also makes people believe that the allies fought Germany because of the atrocities against humanity it committed, when the ugly reality is that the decision to fight Germany was not a humanitarian but a military one: Hitler was out to conquer the world and that made it imprudent to ignore him. Nobody was really too bothered about who he killed at home. Like nobody is really too bothered about who the Saudis kill at home these days, except of course that this makes them good customers for weapons deals.
Agreed. Another basis for me coming out where I finally did on this issue.In other words: there is considerable interest in keeping people dumb, and so there is little wonder that to some degree that is successful. Symbols of veneration in uncommented contexts can easily backfire eventually for that reason.
--
Check out my photos at: https://www.flickr.com/gp/137747053@N07/4M38jj
Last edited:




















