Jonsi
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 6,331
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 9,199
Has anyone kept a running list of all his handles?It's his shtick. Bashing whatever he thinks will get the most reaction. Under multiple accounts.Woah! hold back - there is no need to bash any brands...The biggest, headline-grabbing party Olympus went to recently was the "we're exiting the camera market in Korea" one.You are assuming that Olympus even wants to go to that party, which they have said they have no interest in... so can hardly be late.The context of this was full frame. We all understand where Olympus stands, but they didn't make a move to full frame mirrorless. So in the context of this, they're way way late to the party and will never catch up.Excuse me, you just described Olympus (and Panasonic in partnership).Sony was the only brave boy at the dance.
The cowering followers (as you call them) being, in order, Samsung, Sony, Nikon, Fuji, Leica, Canon, Sigma, Hasselblad.All those girls seated. The boy who makes the first move. He confidently makes his way to the prettiest. Extends his hand. She raises hers. Held by his tractor beam stare, she follows to the dance floor. The brave couple dances like no one is watching.
The remainder hunched group of cowering boys follows, inspired yet still meek, they choose and beg for a chance to dance.
The originators of Micro Four Thirds were the "only brave ones" as you call them.
Sony applying the technology to FF was just marketing strategy driven by desperation at their FF DSLR failure to compete. Desperation is not bravery.
cheers
Also, don't forget the E-M1X. It has all of the size but none of the sensor of FF. So, at least in terms of size, if nothing else, they're arguably competing with FF mirrorless.
All our current brands add to the diversity of what is available - to lose any of them would be tragic.