Apart from focus boxes turning green in AF-C mode, more settings retained in U1 - U3, I'd also like U1 - U3 to work with SnapBridge!!!
Not having contacts on the baseplate for a battery pack release & control dial WAS a blunder but could be got around using Bluetooth or rather clumsily, just wired to the remote release socket that would probably mean foregoing the extra dial.
Although v3.00 has improved autofocus tracking (tuning a3 may be needed), Nikon are still behind Sony here from what I've read & watched.
I just finished 4 weeks of using a Sony A7R IV along my Nikon Z7. I photographed portrait sessions, more informal photography of people (street and “work style”), , architecture, industrial processes, and sill life.
With firmware update 3.0 a rough approximation is that the Z cameras are at most 5 to 10% less capable than the Sony.
In terms of ergonomics and controls the A7RIV is better but Sony has a long way to go to catch up with Nikon. With the EVF Sony has a very long way to go match the Z7. The A7RIV is the first of the A7 series to have a hand grip design that matches the Nikon experience. One thing I really hope the next Sony has is a way to see what the shutter-speed is without having to use the LCD or the EVF. I also applaud Sony adding a lock to exposire biasing control . Control layout, ergonomics, EVF and handgrip are important considerations because they are how you interact with the camera and the more you enjoy using a camera the more you want to get out and make photographs.
Please correct me if I am wrong but one area where Sony has a very clear advantage is being able to use the touch sensitive LCD to move the focus point while using the EVF.
On the difference between 45mp and 60mp:
As long as you remain in the “Lo” (ISO 50, 64, and 80 emulations) and between ISO 100-400 the image quality and dynamic range of the A7RIV is terrific. Above 400 I started to notice the electronic noise as well as actual subject detail, while to my taste the Z7 is good up to at least ISO 1600. This was not just in dark tones but in lower midtones increasing into the middle of the midtone range the higher the ISO is set. I tend not to use noise reduction software as this destroys fine detail.
i suspect it’s an image processing pipeline issue but even with the fastest best quality SDXC media read/write times with the A7RIV is a “contemplative” experience and the several seconds it took for the camera to go from a full frame view to a 100% magnification was frustrating. With the Z7 (and I assume the A7RIII) that is nearly immediate
Acuity;
IBIS works equally well with both.
With excellent lenses on both cameras you can see a bit more subject detail with the A7RIV.
I only tried the Sony pixel shift feature once or twice: To get the most out of it you need a static subject and camera, and consistent lighting. You also need Sony’s processing software. For my needs I much prefer Nikon’s use of Focus-shift technology as well.
A note on raw processing:
I use both Lightroom CC Classic and Capture One Pro 20. Both do an excellent job. Whether you prefer the results from one or the other is a matter of taste. Both programs have strong and weak points.
Ellis Vener
To see my work please visit
http://www.ellisvener.com
Or on instagram @therealellisv