Alex Sarbu
Forum Pro
Isn't it?So, in your opinion an 8year old Pentax camera is... old??Nope.The 55-300 plm is a cropped sensor lens and has also the KAF 4 mount. So with my 8 year old flagship k5ii I can't use. See here where the problem is?I was being sarcastic.This is a strange criticism. This isn't anything unusual. You can't use the newer AF-P Nikkor lenses on older Nikon cameras either. Why would you want to use a 15 year old camera in 2020 with a 1100USD lens? Why not get a better camera or stick to older lenses?It also doesn't have screwdrive-fallback AF mechanism. How am I going to use that on my 15 year old *ist DL? Very disappointing.d) it has no aperture control for older bodies [kaf 4] very disappointing, what happened to the backward compatibility?)
It's a D-FA lens. Full frame lens. Every full frame DSLR made by Pentax can use KAF4 lenses. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
While backwards compatibility is important, users of old equipment should not be allowed to held Pentax hostage in the past. Sorry, the electromagnetic aperture is a superior solution.
Some cameras a K-5II owner could upgrade to:Given the fact that Pentax releases new bodies every once in a blue moon, I think that by Pentax standards the k5ii is relatively new!
- K-3
- K-3 II
- K-70 (debatable as it's lower class but it has better image quality)
- KP
- K-1
- K-1 II
and, soon, the K-new.
I do not think there are many willing to buy the D FA 70-210 for a realistic price, yet unable to upgrade even to a second hand compatible camera.
Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense; the KAF4's purpose is not to force you to upgrade, but to modernize the K-mount, bringing it up to its peers.And they should not force us to upgrade by changing mounts, but by producing modern and competitive cameras!
And as I said, the electromagnetic aperture is a much superior solution.
Alex



