HD Pentax-D FA 70-200mm f/4

d) it has no aperture control for older bodies [kaf 4] very disappointing, what happened to the backward compatibility?)
It also doesn't have screwdrive-fallback AF mechanism. How am I going to use that on my 15 year old *ist DL? Very disappointing.
This is a strange criticism. This isn't anything unusual. You can't use the newer AF-P Nikkor lenses on older Nikon cameras either. Why would you want to use a 15 year old camera in 2020 with a 1100USD lens? Why not get a better camera or stick to older lenses?
I was being sarcastic.

It's a D-FA lens. Full frame lens. Every full frame DSLR made by Pentax can use KAF4 lenses. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
The 55-300 plm is a cropped sensor lens and has also the KAF 4 mount. So with my 8 year old flagship k5ii I can't use. See here where the problem is?
Nope.

While backwards compatibility is important, users of old equipment should not be allowed to held Pentax hostage in the past. Sorry, the electromagnetic aperture is a superior solution.
So, in your opinion an 8year old Pentax camera is... old??
Isn't it?
Given the fact that Pentax releases new bodies every once in a blue moon, I think that by Pentax standards the k5ii is relatively new!
Some cameras a K-5II owner could upgrade to:

- K-3

- K-3 II

- K-70 (debatable as it's lower class but it has better image quality)

- KP

- K-1

- K-1 II

and, soon, the K-new.

I do not think there are many willing to buy the D FA 70-210 for a realistic price, yet unable to upgrade even to a second hand compatible camera.
And they should not force us to upgrade by changing mounts, but by producing modern and competitive cameras!
Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense; the KAF4's purpose is not to force you to upgrade, but to modernize the K-mount, bringing it up to its peers.

And as I said, the electromagnetic aperture is a much superior solution.

Alex
 
d) it has no aperture control for older bodies [kaf 4] very disappointing, what happened to the backward compatibility?)
It also doesn't have screwdrive-fallback AF mechanism. How am I going to use that on my 15 year old *ist DL? Very disappointing.
This is a strange criticism. This isn't anything unusual. You can't use the newer AF-P Nikkor lenses on older Nikon cameras either. Why would you want to use a 15 year old camera in 2020 with a 1100USD lens? Why not get a better camera or stick to older lenses?
I was being sarcastic.

It's a D-FA lens. Full frame lens. Every full frame DSLR made by Pentax can use KAF4 lenses. Therefore, I don't see a problem.
The 55-300 plm is a cropped sensor lens and has also the KAF 4 mount. So with my 8 year old flagship k5ii I can't use. See here where the problem is?
Nope.

While backwards compatibility is important, users of old equipment should not be allowed to held Pentax hostage in the past. Sorry, the electromagnetic aperture is a superior solution.

Besides, quite likely changing the 70-210 for a mechanical aperture linkage would be very difficult, if not impossible. For the 55-300 RE PLM, it was its retractable design.

Alex
DA 18-50mm DC WR RE is also retractable, but not KAF4.
I'm not saying every retractable design requires KAF4.

Alex
 
If Pentax/Ricoh is to survive their existing customer base has to buy the latest cameras, what is the point of a company providing newer cameras at high R&D cost if the customer base is happy to stick with their older cameras.
I have come to the conclusion that Pentax made an enormous miskake with the K-5 series cameras. They are so good that many of us felt no need to move to the K-3. I still use my K-5II and IIs. (I also use my K-1.)

Now that all future Pentax cameras will have baked-in noise reduction,
How many people who actually have a Pentax camera with "baked-in noise reduction" have complained about it or shown detrimental results? And it is not simply buyer justification or whatever it's called...
After carefully comparing results until my eyes bled, I decided to pay for the upgrade.

My only regret is not having sold the K-1 and bought a K-1 II instead.

Alex

--
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say." - George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings
 
Why did it take them this long to rebadge the Tamron? I'm OK for rebadging (Ihave the 24-70 and 15-30), but they could at least do in on time. Take this long and now Pentax has to compete with the discounted price of the Tamron. If one did the math a little, other options (including jumping ship) may turn out cheaper...
Pentax seems at the moment to be concentrating on prime lenses (the 50 and 85). This was their primary emphasis in the past, and perhaps they are going back to it. Also, they need lenses to support the K-1 cameras, and the Tamron lenses they are rebadging are high quaiity. I don't, however, know why it took them so long to rebadge this lens.

Joe
I just had a thought in regard to my last sentence above: Perhaps Pentax had to wait for Tamron to have an opening in their production line.

Joe
 
Thank you.

With the dfa 15-30 .24-70 and now 70-210mm tamron is still supporting k mount even if it has pentax name.

And this good thing. We have a good company that supports our brand standing behind the wall!

Also tokina with dfa*50mm.
Think that dfa*50mm is genuine Pentax lens and not Tokina.
It is a Pentax lens, licensed to Tokina.

Joe
 
I only know that there are planings for a renewing of these two lenses but I have no information if it is real or in production.

It was planned February 2017.

But there are minimum ten more lenses in the pipeline.

Best regards
 
I only know that there are planings for a renewing of these two lenses but I have no information if it is real or in production.

It was planned February 2017.

But there are minimum ten more lenses in the pipeline.

Best regards
10 huh? Can’t hardly wait 😅😱
 
a) it's indeed a Tamron design (a little bit disappointing)
Yes, it is disappointing..especially given the current price. Nothing new though. Some previous lenses have been either clones or co-designed with other manufacturers. They could had offered this cloned lens earlier though, as Doug pointed out.
b) it's lighter than the 70-200 2.8 Pentax lens (as expected)
Yes, that's very good! I'm more likely to buy this lens in future (if and ONLY if Pentax fixes their AF issues) than the Pentax DFA 70-200mm f/2.8 lens.
The superb DFA 70-200mm f2.8 can be bought new in the UK for £1400 so this makes the Tamron f4 clone looking highly over priced at £1100.
c) it has no tripod mount (why? It's not that light)
That's personal preference. Its not a deal breaker for me at least--not with the weight this lens has.
I wouldn't fancy using hanging this long lens with hood off the front of the camera in slight wind, tripod feet or collars are always better for stability holding the camera lens combo around 1/2 way.
d) it has no aperture control for older bodies [kaf 4] very disappointing, what happened to the backward compatibility?)
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63551615
Nah aperture levers don't belong in new lenses, electronic aperture is better. Come on, why use old sensors in clunky old K-5s etc. with a modern lens, anyhow the lens is geared towards K-1 users being FF and even the K-1 can't use it as a sports tracking action lens.
e) 1200 euros msrp???? For a rebagded Tamron lens?? While the current canon version of the same lens sales for 800 euros?? Why??
Yes, it is quite expensive at the moment and I'm not planning to buy it anytime soon. Peter had a good point about price comparison. Fortunately, I already have a Sigma 75-200mm f/3.8 autofocus lens and it serves my needs so far.
Matt Granger tested the Tamron 70-210 f4 on his Nikon D850 and it could do the torture tracking test pretty well so any crap AF performance will be Pentax cameras inability, I thought I'd mention this a few weeks before any reviews and complaints at the lens not being a sports lens... It is on everything but Pentax.
 
I only know that there are planings for a renewing of these two lenses but I have no information if it is real or in production.

It was planned February 2017.

But there are minimum ten more lenses in the pipeline.

Best regards
10 huh? Can’t hardly wait 😅😱
10? Yeah right LoL

No more waiting, life is too short and that pipeline goes to infinity and beyond.
 
I only know that there are planings for a renewing of these two lenses but I have no information if it is real or in production.

It was planned February 2017.

But there are minimum ten more lenses in the pipeline.

Best regards
10 huh? Can’t hardly wait 😅😱
10? Yeah right LoL

No more waiting, life is too short and that pipeline goes to infinity and beyond.
I can wait. Mine is kinda slow. 🤣
 
I only know that there are planings for a renewing of these two lenses but I have no information if it is real or in production.

It was planned February 2017.

But there are minimum ten more lenses in the pipeline.

Best regards
10 huh? Can’t hardly wait 😅😱
10? Yeah right LoL

No more waiting, life is too short and that pipeline goes to infinity and beyond.
I can wait. Mine is kinda slow. 🤣
More chance of Betelgeuse going supernova 😀

There were rumours it did about 6 hours ago and many people went outside to check...

All this waiting, low probabilities and living in perpetual hope. 😃
 
Why did it take them this long to rebadge the Tamron? I'm OK for rebadging (Ihave the 24-70 and 15-30), but they could at least do in on time. Take this long and now Pentax has to compete with the discounted price of the Tamron. If one did the math a little, other options (including jumping ship) may turn out cheaper...
Pentax seems at the moment to be concentrating on prime lenses (the 50 and 85). This was their primary emphasis in the past, and perhaps they are going back to it. Also, they need lenses to support the K-1 cameras, and the Tamron lenses they are rebadging are high quaiity. I don't, however, know why it took them so long to rebadge this lens.

Joe
I just had a thought in regard to my last sentence above: Perhaps Pentax had to wait for Tamron to have an opening in their production line.
i think so too.

Still the new lens is of a design that allows for VC (tamron speak for vibration control, i think) - so a number of elements half way through the lens that are small enough to be moved by the VC motors....

For that price, however is a bit steep (and the current Tamron price is very attractive). The DFA* f/2.8 was just a little more on black Friday, and that one is truly stellar. (I got one but had to return it as it was defective. But the bokeh i saw was exceptional, smooth as butter, especially for a zoom)

Looking forward to the 85...
 
amazon.co.uk published the product page yesterday but promptly withdrew it, amazon.es did the same this morning, which makes it possible to report the main features of the HD Pentax-D FA 70-210mm f/4 ED SDM WR:

https://www.amazon.es/PENTAX-D-70-210-F4ED-SDM-Teleobjetivo/dp/B083ZSSGVL/
  • 20 elements, of which 3 ED elements and 2 made of anomalous partial dispersion glass, in 14 groups
  • HD coating
  • fluorine water-repellent coating of the front element (Super Protect)
  • weather resistant (WR)
  • internal focusing
  • ring ultrasonic motor (Ring SDM)
That's a big step up compared to the DFA* big brother for fast action!
  • full time manual focus override (Quick Shift focus)
  • minimum focusing distance: 0.95m
  • electromagnetic aperture command & control (KAF4)
  • rounded aperture blades
  • focus limiter
even faster AF
  • filter diameter: 67mm
  • no tripod collar in the box
Seeing that it's lighter than the 24-70 and the 15-30, i guess this is not necessary...
  • weight: 819g
OK, i can travel with this one easily! (My 150-450 is a bit heavy! :)
  • announcement on Wednesday the 23rd at 10pm UTC (Thursday morning in Japan)
  • available on the 14th of February
Valentine's day! Hint hint!
  • €1,199 (€1,219,15 at amazon.es).
2a24e6069cd64055b7361089004ab5fa.jpg

0796a3d49ad54a1ab539b1187dc43f55.jpg

56a318e77e39407a9ed8e92121e7eed4.jpg

3b1220e4e7bd48d08f9a106473d1f43f.jpg


--
-----------------------------------------------
Miles Green
Pentaxian since 1997!
Corfu, Greece
N.B. All my images are protected by Copyright
 
amazon.co.uk published the product page yesterday but promptly withdrew it, amazon.es did the same this morning, which makes it possible to report the main features of the HD Pentax-D FA 70-210mm f/4 ED SDM WR:

https://www.amazon.es/PENTAX-D-70-210-F4ED-SDM-Teleobjetivo/dp/B083ZSSGVL/
  • 20 elements, of which 3 ED elements and 2 made of anomalous partial dispersion glass, in 14 groups
  • HD coating
  • fluorine water-repellent coating of the front element (Super Protect)
  • weather resistant (WR)
  • internal focusing
  • ring ultrasonic motor (Ring SDM)
  • full time manual focus override (Quick Shift focus)
  • minimum focusing distance: 0.95m
  • electromagnetic aperture command & control (KAF4)
  • rounded aperture blades
  • focus limiter
  • filter diameter: 67mm
  • no tripod collar in the box
  • weight: 819g
  • announcement on Wednesday the 23rd at 10pm UTC (Thursday morning in Japan)
  • available on the 14th of February
  • €1,199 (€1,219,15 at amazon.es).
2a24e6069cd64055b7361089004ab5fa.jpg

0796a3d49ad54a1ab539b1187dc43f55.jpg

56a318e77e39407a9ed8e92121e7eed4.jpg

3b1220e4e7bd48d08f9a106473d1f43f.jpg
I was all for Pentax using Tamron glass ...... but there is a serious downside to this latest offering ...... the price !!

This is not a 1,200 euro lens !!

Nikon/Canon versions are available for 560 euros and they have Tamron's VC !!

--
Dave's clichés
 
Tamron makes no mention of anomalous dispersion (aspherical) glass.

Pentax does, 2 elements.

Could it be that the optical formula is the same, but that Tamron decided to keep the costs down for its own production? Unlikely though...
 
This is not a 1,200 euro lens !!

Nikon/Canon versions are available for 560 euros and they have Tamron's VC !!
I just checked and it's 399 EUR for the Tamron here in Belgium (several dealers).
Check to see if they are Tamron official prices (non grey market) ...... the prices I quoted are!!
 
The superb DFA 70-200mm f2.8 can be bought new in the UK for £1400 so this makes the Tamron f4 clone looking highly over priced at £1100.
True. This is introductory price though....it could drop in few months
Matt Granger tested the Tamron 70-210 f4 on his Nikon D850 and it could do the torture tracking test pretty well so any crap AF performance will be Pentax cameras inability, I thought I'd mention this a few weeks before any reviews and complaints at the lens not being a sports lens... It is on everything but Pentax.
Yes, I'm sure this lens is very good for fast action on Canikon. Only the AF module in Pentax cameras will be limiting its abilities.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top