Is this the banding everyone was talking about?

orbitalpunk

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
415
Reaction score
19
Location
your area, US
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.



horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass



verticle banding
verticle banding



 vertical banding
vertical banding
 
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle, the other related to the PDAF sites on the sensor. Both result in horizontal bands. Since you are seeing vertical bands in some of your examples, the answer is no, this is not the banding that everyone was talking about.

I would say stick with a reliable raw processor rather than your computer's native image preview software. If you don't like LR, you might try Nikon's free offerings.
 
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting.
the other related to the PDAF sites on the sensor.
This is an issue generic to MILCs:

https://photographylife.com/the-reality-behind-nikon-z-banding-issues
Both result in horizontal bands. Since you are seeing vertical bands in some of your examples, the answer is no, this is not the banding that everyone was talking about.
Were some of the captures taken in portrait orientation?
I would say stick with a reliable raw processor rather than your computer's native image preview software. If you don't like LR, you might try Nikon's free offerings.
Good suggestion.
 
Last edited:
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting.
the other related to the PDAF sites on the sensor.
This is an issue generic to MILCs:

https://photographylife.com/the-reality-behind-nikon-z-banding-issues
Both result in horizontal bands. Since you are seeing vertical bands in some of your examples, the answer is no, this is not the banding that everyone was talking about.
Were some of the captures taken in portrait orientation?
I would say stick with a reliable raw processor rather than your computer's native image preview software. If you don't like LR, you might try Nikon's free offerings.
Good suggestion.
yes, some were taking in the horizontal position. The grass shot.
 
How did you get your shutter speed to 1/10000? :)
 
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.

horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass

verticle banding
verticle banding

vertical banding
vertical banding
Assuming that some of these shots were taken in portrait orientation, yes, this is the kind of banding it was talked about. However, first all MILC suffer from these effects, some more some less (Nikon being amongst the less afaik), but in reality, you wont see it at all. I am shooting the Z7 since over a year now and I never ever came across banding in a realistic case. Yes you can provoke it, but that is not reality.

Finally, even if you would find it, programs like RawTherapee offer simple ways to completely remove it without any visible image quality impact.

So bottom line an absolute no brainer.
 
Last edited:
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.

horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass

verticle banding
verticle banding

vertical banding
vertical banding
Assuming that some of these shots were taken in portrait orientation, yes, this is the kind of banding it was talked about. However, first all MILC suffer from these effects, some more some less (Nikon being amongst the less afaik), but in reality, you wont see it at all. I am shooting the Z7 since over a year now and I never ever came across banding in a realistic case. Yes you can provoke it, but that is not reality.

Finally, even if you would find it, programs like RawTherapee offer simple ways to completely remove it without any visible image quality impact.

So bottom line an absolute no brainer.
these shots are not "provoked" the last two are studio shots at iso 200. the first one was daylight outside. anyways, ive decided to go with the A7RIV. this banding was just the tipping point for me. There were other things i was trying to accept so this wasn't the one issue the changed my mind. The z7 could not recover highlights as well. reviwes said it, ignored it until i saw it for myself, could not pick up textures as well, adapted nikkor 105 macro lens was awful on it so no macro lens right now, and its produced a lot more color noise. the a7riv had more grain, but the color noise i couldn't live with. the IOS and iPad remote app had the features i needed for the a7RIV, the snap bridge app didn't. it was a hard and laborious decision. I will wait till nikon can resolve some of these issues in their next camera. their design and build is superior to Sony and I hope to give Nikon another try in the future.
 
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.

horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass

verticle banding
verticle banding

vertical banding
vertical banding
Assuming that some of these shots were taken in portrait orientation, yes, this is the kind of banding it was talked about. However, first all MILC suffer from these effects, some more some less (Nikon being amongst the less afaik), but in reality, you wont see it at all. I am shooting the Z7 since over a year now and I never ever came across banding in a realistic case. Yes you can provoke it, but that is not reality.

Finally, even if you would find it, programs like RawTherapee offer simple ways to completely remove it without any visible image quality impact.

So bottom line an absolute no brainer.
these shots are not "provoked" the last two are studio shots at iso 200. the first one was daylight outside. anyways, ive decided to go with the A7RIV. this banding was just the tipping point for me. There were other things i was trying to accept so this wasn't the one issue the changed my mind. The z7 could not recover highlights as well. reviwes said it, ignored it until i saw it for myself, could not pick up textures as well, adapted nikkor 105 macro lens was awful on it so no macro lens right now, and its produced a lot more color noise. the a7riv had more grain, but the color noise i couldn't live with. the IOS and iPad remote app had the features i needed for the a7RIV, the snap bridge app didn't. it was a hard and laborious decision. I will wait till nikon can resolve some of these issues in their next camera. their design and build is superior to Sony and I hope to give Nikon another try in the future.
I agree with you that it is not accurate to say that the banding is only there if 'provoked' by shooting in a way that is not 'reality'. It's easy to produce in specific circumstances. Some people will never shoot in those conditions. Doesn't mean it's not reality.
 
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting
In fact, it is not not even connected to digital cameras but to horizontal shutters moving at the wrong shutter speed, regardless if the camera uses electronic or mechanical shutter. Just that the banding may look more obvious with the electronic than the mechanical shutter due to the distance between the shutter blades and the image sensor when the mechanical shutter is used.
 
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.

horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass

verticle banding
verticle banding

vertical banding
vertical banding
Assuming that some of these shots were taken in portrait orientation, yes, this is the kind of banding it was talked about. However, first all MILC suffer from these effects, some more some less (Nikon being amongst the less afaik), but in reality, you wont see it at all. I am shooting the Z7 since over a year now and I never ever came across banding in a realistic case. Yes you can provoke it, but that is not reality.

Finally, even if you would find it, programs like RawTherapee offer simple ways to completely remove it without any visible image quality impact.

So bottom line an absolute no brainer.
these shots are not "provoked" the last two are studio shots at iso 200. the first one was daylight outside. anyways, ive decided to go with the A7RIV. this banding was just the tipping point for me. There were other things i was trying to accept so this wasn't the one issue the changed my mind. The z7 could not recover highlights as well. reviwes said it, ignored it until i saw it for myself, could not pick up textures as well, adapted nikkor 105 macro lens was awful on it so no macro lens right now, and its produced a lot more color noise. the a7riv had more grain, but the color noise i couldn't live with. the IOS and iPad remote app had the features i needed for the a7RIV, the snap bridge app didn't. it was a hard and laborious decision. I will wait till nikon can resolve some of these issues in their next camera. their design and build is superior to Sony and I hope to give Nikon another try in the future.
If you get this in normal conditions... well... I am out...
 
....

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso.
Just to be clear, you might get this striping/banding at low ISO like you are showing here, but it will disappear at high ISO - it effectively gets swamped by image noise.
 
It's weird, from what I remember from the last ~10.000 pictures with the Z7 I've seen such a banding in at most 5 pictures. On my Z6 I've never had such issues yet. And after putting a luminosity noise reduction of 10 or so in Lightroom, the banding was gone in those 5 images. It's there, but at least for me it did not change anything. 🤷‍♂️

Be aware that *all* mirrorless cameras share the same kind of problem. Just because the Sony didn't showed it in your test does not mean it's not jumping into your face on other situations. See here https://photographylife.com/the-reality-behind-nikon-z-banding-issues

Just curious, can you provide full res images with intact EXIF of your samples? Thank you!

Anyway, you will be for sure happy with your choice. The Sony is an excellent camera as the Nikon is. Same thing with just a bit different taste like all modern mirrorless cameras. 😁

--
https://www.downgra.de/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rico-schiekel/
 
Last edited:
So I'm currently deciding between the Nikon Z7 and the Sony A7RV1. I love how the Nikon feels and operates, but the image quality from the A7RVI is make the choice difficult. I ordered some other lenses for the Nikon to even the playing field.

But today I discovered banding in the Z7 images and I am wondering if this is the banding people were talking about or is my camera defective. I see banding in 200iso images so its not just high iso. The other thing is I didn't see or discover it in Lightroom, but I discovered it only after opening a RAW image in macOS Preview because I felt Lightroom was making these strange auto adjustments to every image and wanted to see what Preview would do. It's as if Lightroom processes the banding out up to a certain point. The A7RVI didn't show banding in the side by side shot in Preview.

horizontal banding in the grass
horizontal banding in the grass

verticle banding
verticle banding

vertical banding
vertical banding
Assuming that some of these shots were taken in portrait orientation, yes, this is the kind of banding it was talked about. However, first all MILC suffer from these effects, some more some less (Nikon being amongst the less afaik), but in reality, you wont see it at all. I am shooting the Z7 since over a year now and I never ever came across banding in a realistic case. Yes you can provoke it, but that is not reality.

Finally, even if you would find it, programs like RawTherapee offer simple ways to completely remove it without any visible image quality impact.

So bottom line an absolute no brainer.
these shots are not "provoked" the last two are studio shots at iso 200. the first one was daylight outside. anyways, ive decided to go with the A7RIV. this banding was just the tipping point for me. There were other things i was trying to accept so this wasn't the one issue the changed my mind. The z7 could not recover highlights as well. reviwes said it, ignored it until i saw it for myself, could not pick up textures as well, adapted nikkor 105 macro lens was awful on it so no macro lens right now, and its produced a lot more color noise. the a7riv had more grain, but the color noise i couldn't live with. the IOS and iPad remote app had the features i needed for the a7RIV, the snap bridge app didn't. it was a hard and laborious decision. I will wait till nikon can resolve some of these issues in their next camera. their design and build is superior to Sony and I hope to give Nikon another try in the future.
If you get this in normal conditions... well... I am out...
I am pretty sure that the banding you see in these images are caused by bad PP and not related to any real problem except his choice of precessing the images.
 
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting
In fact, it is not not even connected to digital cameras but to horizontal shutters moving at the wrong shutter speed, regardless if the camera uses electronic or mechanical shutter. Just that the banding may look more obvious with the electronic than the mechanical shutter due to the distance between the shutter blades and the image sensor when the mechanical shutter is used.
The Nikon Z7 uses a vertical shutter. Or are you saying that this is only relevant to cameras that DO use horizontal shutters?

https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/mirrorless/z_7/spec.htm

Actually has there been a camera made in the past 35 years or so that had a horizontal shutter? I believe the last Nikon to have one was the F3.
 
Last edited:
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting
In fact, it is not not even connected to digital cameras but to horizontal shutters moving at the wrong shutter speed, regardless if the camera uses electronic or mechanical shutter. Just that the banding may look more obvious with the electronic than the mechanical shutter due to the distance between the shutter blades and the image sensor when the mechanical shutter is used.
The Nikon Z7 uses a vertical shutter. Or are you saying that this is only relevant to cameras that DO use horizontal shutters?

https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/mirrorless/z_7/spec.htm

Actually has there been a camera made in the past 35 years or so that had a horizontal shutter? I believe the last Nikon to have one was the F3.
Of course I meant vertical shutter, not horizontal. The blades are horizontal but the movement is vertical.
 
There are two types of banding that have been discussed, one that occurs with the electronic shutter and certain light sources that cycle
This is an issue generic to all mainstream digital cameras due to the lighting
In fact, it is not not even connected to digital cameras but to horizontal shutters moving at the wrong shutter speed, regardless if the camera uses electronic or mechanical shutter. Just that the banding may look more obvious with the electronic than the mechanical shutter due to the distance between the shutter blades and the image sensor when the mechanical shutter is used.
The Nikon Z7 uses a vertical shutter. Or are you saying that this is only relevant to cameras that DO use horizontal shutters?

https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/mirrorless/z_7/spec.htm

Actually has there been a camera made in the past 35 years or so that had a horizontal shutter? I believe the last Nikon to have one was the F3.
Of course I meant vertical shutter, not horizontal. The blades are horizontal but the movement is vertical.
Thanks for clarifying.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top