B
Bill 10
Guest
I did some testing Fuji 16-80mm again. I used different FL, 16, 23, 50, 70 and 80 mm. Reference 60mm/2.4 macro.
I made some prints 11 x 17 inch Epson 4900, highest quality. I am not a pixel peeper and I am not a dot peeper. The rough rule of thumb is that the viewing distance is 1.5 to 2 times the diagonal length. So in this case, the viewings distance is about 34 – 46 inch.
After viewing the prints many times I can say the difference in sharpness between 80mm and 70mm in the corners is pretty small. The difference in sharpness between 16mm and 23mm in the corners is pretty small too. I doubt if everyone can see the difference.
Results 23mm, 50mm, 70mm and 60mm macro are more or less the same.
60mm Macro 8.0

80mm/8.0

70mm/8.0

50mm/8.0

23mm/8.0

16mm/8.0

I made some prints 11 x 17 inch Epson 4900, highest quality. I am not a pixel peeper and I am not a dot peeper. The rough rule of thumb is that the viewing distance is 1.5 to 2 times the diagonal length. So in this case, the viewings distance is about 34 – 46 inch.
After viewing the prints many times I can say the difference in sharpness between 80mm and 70mm in the corners is pretty small. The difference in sharpness between 16mm and 23mm in the corners is pretty small too. I doubt if everyone can see the difference.
Results 23mm, 50mm, 70mm and 60mm macro are more or less the same.
60mm Macro 8.0

80mm/8.0

70mm/8.0

50mm/8.0

23mm/8.0

16mm/8.0




