Sony RX100 V or VI ....snap focus?

Samsunguser

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
420
Reaction score
240
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?

thanks
 
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
 
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
Precisely, there's no need for a guessed hyperfocus point when the latest Sonys deliver amazing AF. From memory I think the Sonys default out of the box to continuous AF thus further speeding up AF - and helping eat that small battery. :-(
 
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
Really I am looking a seeting like

Full Press Snap Focus – A function to directly override Auto Focus and shoot using a predefined distance.
Yes, but why?
For stree photography, to gain speed and no loss time focusing without worrie about focus area
 
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
Really I am looking a seeting like

Full Press Snap Focus – A function to directly override Auto Focus and shoot using a predefined distance.
Yes, but why?
For stree photography, to gain speed and no loss time focusing without worrie about focus area
These cameras have lightning fast autofocus, even in low light. Just use zone area focus (with the zone at the 12 o'clock position), AF-A or AF-C, and forget about it. You'll get much better results than if you have to guess and program a focal distance in advance.

It would seem perverse to pay the money for one of the fastest focusing systems available, and then dumb it down by just using fixed focus, which will usually produce soft images unless your guess was very lucky. You might as well just buy a vintage camera without autofocus.
 
There is simply nothing faster than "not" auto-focusing at all. Snap focus is faster than any auto-focus system. It would be a great feature to have.

The reason you might use it for example is: say you have focused on something in the distance (20ft), and something comes close in the foreground at 3ft suddenly that I want to be in focus; if my snap focus distance is set to 3ft, I can jam on the shutter get whatever is the foreground in focus.

This happens all the time in the street.

It's a useful feature and I for one would welcome it with open arms.
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
Really I am looking a seeting like

Full Press Snap Focus – A function to directly override Auto Focus and shoot using a predefined distance.
Yes, but why?
For stree photography, to gain speed and no loss time focusing without worrie about focus area
These cameras have lightning fast autofocus, even in low light. Just use zone area focus (with the zone at the 12 o'clock position), AF-A or AF-C, and forget about it. You'll get much better results than if you have to guess and program a focal distance in advance.

It would seem perverse to pay the money for one of the fastest focusing systems available, and then dumb it down by just using fixed focus, which will usually produce soft images unless your guess was very lucky. You might as well just buy a vintage camera without autofocus.
 
There is simply nothing faster than "not" auto-focusing at all. Snap focus is faster than any auto-focus system. It would be a great feature to have.

The reason you might use it for example is: say you have focused on something in the distance (20ft), and something comes close in the foreground at 3ft suddenly that I want to be in focus; if my snap focus distance is set to 3ft, I can jam on the shutter get whatever is the foreground in focus.

This happens all the time in the street.

It's a useful feature and I for one would welcome it with open arms.
And suppose something comes 8 ft away? The RX100M6 would instantly focus on it, and the Ricoh would be out of focus.
 
There is simply nothing faster than "not" auto-focusing at all. Snap focus is faster than any auto-focus system. It would be a great feature to have.

The reason you might use it for example is: say you have focused on something in the distance (20ft), and something comes close in the foreground at 3ft suddenly that I want to be in focus; if my snap focus distance is set to 3ft, I can jam on the shutter get whatever is the foreground in focus.
What if the closer subject is at 10 feet, 5 feet, 15 feet etc, etc? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like it's usefulness is quite limited. I don't do street photography so maybe I'm missing something. According to reviews the GR III AF isn't great, certainly not in RX100V/VI class, so maybe for that camera it could be useful.

--
Tom
 
Last edited:
Well, typically snap focus is used with a large depth of field, with a technique called zone-focusing.

Essentially, you focus on a specific distance and then let the wide focus do the rest.

So if I have preset focus of 3ft @ f8 my focus range might be 1ft to 12ft. This focus range obviously depends on sensor size and aperture and distance.

It's a useful feature regardless of the AF speed.

In addition to the previous example I gave; lets say something moves parallel to you through the frame that you want in focus, even with RX100 tracking modes, you have to make sure you are locked onto that subject. That can be tricky especially if the subject is moving (and/or you are moving). But if I am preset focus distance, I simply have to stand at the preset distance (or know how far the subject is from me) and just jam the button down.

tbcass wrote:
There is simply nothing faster than "not" auto-focusing at all. Snap focus is faster than any auto-focus system. It would be a great feature to have.

The reason you might use it for example is: say you have focused on something in the distance (20ft), and something comes close in the foreground at 3ft suddenly that I want to be in focus; if my snap focus distance is set to 3ft, I can jam on the shutter get whatever is the foreground in focus.
What if the closer subject is at 10 feet, 5 feet, 15 feet etc, etc? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like it's usefulness is quite limited. I don't do street photography so maybe I'm missing something. According to reviews the GR III AF isn't great, certainly not in RX100V/VI class, so maybe for that camera it could be useful.
 
Well, typically snap focus is used with a large depth of field, with a technique called zone-focusing.

Essentially, you focus on a specific distance and then let the wide focus do the rest.

So if I have preset focus of 3ft @ f8 my focus range might be 1ft to 12ft. This focus range obviously depends on sensor size and aperture and distance.
At those settings with the APS-C sensor in the Ricoh the DOF is only 0.38 ft even at f8 and printing at a small 8x10 size according to this DOF calculator.

https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/dof-calculator.htm

cd8bfd9e277b44b19d00f77cda99a215.jpg

I think I'd rather trust the fast accurate AF of the RX100 VI

--
Tom
 
Last edited:
For 3 feet the ‘snap focus’ mode is obviously questionable, but for 2 or 3 meters it is extremely useful. You could easily get DoF of 4ft to infinity using snap mode with a reasonable aperture of f8 and a typical 28mm focal length.

Just yesterday I lost a shot taken through a window because the camera focused on the window instead of the subject beyond it. Snap focus is a real benefit when autofocus doesn’t cut it.
 
I am a street photographer and find that AF-C nails my shot probably 85% of the time. I have the custom button set to manual focus, so if the AF doesn't lock in it is just a couple of seconds before I can focus on what I want. But there are ways of "helping" the AF- sometimes it locks on the wrong moving subject, and you just need to pan a little and the AF will pick up the other subject, then recompose while the AF stays locked on the subject you want.
 
Hello,

Is there any setting for Sony RX100 V-VI that can be similar to the Snap Focus of Ricoh GR?
No, I don't think so, but why would you want it?
Really I am looking a seeting like

Full Press Snap Focus – A function to directly override Auto Focus and shoot using a predefined distance.
Yes, but why?
For stree photography, to gain speed and no loss time focusing without worrie about focus area
These cameras have lightning fast autofocus, even in low light. Just use zone area focus (with the zone at the 12 o'clock position), AF-A or AF-C, and forget about it. You'll get much better results than if you have to guess and program a focal distance in advance.

It would seem perverse to pay the money for one of the fastest focusing systems available, and then dumb it down by just using fixed focus, which will usually produce soft images unless your guess was very lucky. You might as well just buy a vintage camera without autofocus.
sorry that’s wrong. It’s slower than snap focus. It’s just a fact. Practice street work and you’ll understand. Snap focus, ore focus, hyperfocal, and focus to infinity are variations in the same concept and are superior to AF for this kind of work
 
There is simply nothing faster than "not" auto-focusing at all. Snap focus is faster than any auto-focus system. It would be a great feature to have.

The reason you might use it for example is: say you have focused on something in the distance (20ft), and something comes close in the foreground at 3ft suddenly that I want to be in focus; if my snap focus distance is set to 3ft, I can jam on the shutter get whatever is the foreground in focus.
What if the closer subject is at 10 feet, 5 feet, 15 feet etc, etc? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like it's usefulness is quite limited. I don't do street photography so maybe I'm missing something. According to reviews the GR III AF isn't great, certainly not in RX100V/VI class, so maybe for that camera it could be useful.
 
I am a street photographer and find that AF-C nails my shot probably 85% of the time. I have the custom button set to manual focus, so if the AF doesn't lock in it is just a couple of seconds before I can focus on what I want. But there are ways of "helping" the AF- sometimes it locks on the wrong moving subject, and you just need to pan a little and the AF will pick up the other subject, then recompose while the AF stays locked on the subject you want.
A couple of seconds? LOL. Seriously no. Snap focus cannot be replaced by AFC or any SONY algo. Sorry. It’s a problem for those cameras and why Ricoh reigns supreme for this kind of work.
 
sorry that’s wrong. It’s slower than snap focus. It’s just a fact. Practice street work and you’ll understand. Snap focus, ore focus, hyperfocal, and focus to infinity are variations in the same concept and are superior to AF for this kind of work
With my RX100M6 set to centre spot focus there's no worries about AF speed and accuracy. Not "serious" street shooting in my case, just random things and people I see when wandering, it always works fine.

Regards..... Guy
 
For 3 feet the ‘snap focus’ mode is obviously questionable, but for 2 or 3 meters it is extremely useful. You could easily get DoF of 4ft to infinity using snap mode with a reasonable aperture of f8 and a typical 28mm focal length.

Just yesterday I lost a shot taken through a window because the camera focused on the window instead of the subject beyond it. Snap focus is a real benefit when autofocus doesn’t cut it.
Certainly shooting through a window is problematic. I avoid the problem you describe by holding the lens against the glass to eliminate reflections. I tend to do it as little as possible because window glass has negative effects on IQ.
 
Park Avenue Airwolf wrote: Ricoh reigns supreme for this kind of work.
It should because I suspect that the camera was designed with street photography in mind. It is not however as good all rounder as the Sony. Very few Sony Cyber Shot users in this forum seem to do much street photography. I know I don't and on the rare times I do at festivals and events it's not the quick incognito style. I do it openly and unhurried.

--
Tom
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top