Musing on value of vintage lenses

I have the Zorki as well, complete with yak leather case.

To be honest, it's not the greatest camera (although mine works perfectly) - kind of a rangefinder Zenit E without the light meter. The viewfinder in particular is terrible. It's a hole with glass in front of it - no framelines, not even a rectangle. Just a vague hole. I've seen better viewfinders on a box camera.
Yes I know it's basic, but do you have the 4K? reviews I've seen say it's pretty bright and definitely very usable, the best of the Russian rangefinders in that respect. Having been used to using 1950's folders I can't imagine the viewfinder being any smaller or more tricky to use than those.
I have three old rangefinders: Zorki 4K/Jupiter 8 50/2, a Yashica electro 35 and a Ricoh RF500G

The Japanese cameras are electronic marvels while the Zorki is a Russian copy of an ancient Leica.

The Japanese cameras have nice brightline framelines, the Zorki doesn't. You look through a tiny hole in the back and there is no apparent frame at all. If you move your eye around the eyepiece it seems unbounded, like looking through a hole in a piece of cardboard. If you shift your eye around you can see anywhere you want, no obvious edge. Eventually if you peer through at a sharp enough angle, you see reflections bouncing around that shade to dark but there are no crisp sharp frame edges. It is nothing like the little viewfinder in my Fuji X10 or old Canon powershots where there is a sharp cut off at the edges of the VF.

If you were using this for serious photography, composition would be a wild guess. You'd be better off with a hot shoe mounted accessory and just use the official viewfinder for focusing. One good thing about it is that there is a lever around the film rewind knob that is a dioptre/VF focusing adjustment. It has a lot of travel so you can adjust for your eyesight.

The funny thing is that if I look to the right, I can see the prism. It is like having a mirror in the edge of the viewfinder with a secondary image. You don't see that if you look straight ahead fortunately but it isn't a sophisticated VF by any stretch.

I got my Zorki because it was cheaper than buying the 50mm lens on its own. I had to take my Jupiter 8 apart because it was almost impossible to turn the focusing ring. Applied a bit of Sudecreme antiseptic lotion as lube. Worked a treat, still going strong after several years.

I used to have a Zorki back in about 1977, so it's fun to have one again but I wouldn't bother using it.
So my Zorki 4k arrived, and I love it, it's in mint condition and everything works, it also came with a Yak leather case which is in very good condition. The lens is lovely and smooth to focus and I was surprised by how small it is, but it's in perfect condition. The camera itself is very well made, simple and functional, and I have no problem focusing, even in lower light. I've already loaded a roll of FP4 and it's a ready to go, I can't wait to shoot with it.
 
Enjoy!

I picked up a cheap xt1 for my vintage lenses. It has a viewfinder that doesn't need you to press a button to get focus aids. It even has a digital split image range finder. And it looks the retro part with the old lenses. Contax like.
 
Enjoy!

I picked up a cheap xt1 for my vintage lenses. It has a viewfinder that doesn't need you to press a button to get focus aids. It even has a digital split image range finder. And it looks the retro part with the old lenses. Contax like.
Ditto, I used to own an XT1, there's a lot to like about it, in the end I just couldn't get on with the colour from it, but that's a subjective thing, it'll do a grand job for what you're using it for.
 
Hello!

I also like to use my old Xpro1 for adapting and even went as far as to completely blacken it out for the cool looks alone (having the buttons down by heart): ;)



crappy phone snap
crappy phone snap

Best,

Alex

--
carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
 
Hello!

I also like to use my old Xpro1 for adapting and even went as far as to completely blacken it out for the cool looks alone (having the buttons down by heart): ;)

crappy phone snap
crappy phone snap

Best,

Alex
I like your gold shutter button. Will you be adding any more gold to your little black beastie?

I'm surprised more companies don't create special versions of their retro style cameras, with black and gold and black and red (metallic red, of course) color schemes (on the lens too). Pentax comes to mind. I could see them making a 36 MP rangefinder style full-frame mirrorless camera, with a new mount, adapter to use their DSLR lenses (of course, like Nikon, Canon, and others), and three different color schemes. They could make five small prime lenses to start with, producing them all in the three color schemes. The lenses and mechanical parts inside woud all be the same, so the only differences woud be some screw and rings maybe. It wouldn't cost much extra to produce the three different styles, such as black, chrome, and black-and-gold. They might enhance their offering in the future with a grey edition, followed by an all gold edition, once they have a couple more lenses available for their new mirrorless system. All would be weather sealed, of course, remaining true to Pentax style.

--
Scott Barton Kennelly
 
Hello Scott!

I initially had the lugs for the carrystrap painted black as well but eventually removed it again because I did like the chrome contrast better in the end. I think I will leave the soft-release button as the only splash of colour. Did the lacquer-job about three years ago and so far it is holding out great - only had to refinish a single button on the back once.

Best,

Alex
 
I'm surprised more companies don't create special versions of their retro style cameras, with black and gold and black and red (metallic red, of course) color schemes (on the lens too). Pentax comes to mind. I could see them making a 36 MP rangefinder style full-frame mirrorless camera …
Would it still be mirrorless with the metallic parts? :)
 
This shot reminds me that getting that bubbly bokeh look doesn't always depend on using a vintage lens. Finding the "right" subject is vital too.

Shot with the SD1 Merrill and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG Art - wide open

Shot with the SD1 Merrill and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG Art - wide open

--
Regards,
Vitée
Capture all the light and colour!
 
...............
Thanks George. I just figure an OOC jpeg sort of tells a simple tale, with few details, but I get what you mean. I'm planning to get some 50mm Takumars. When I do, I'll shoot some comparison shots, and I'll post some results with the OOC jpegs using my standard settings . . . and I'll disclose as much info. as possible.
Just keep in mind that some of those old Takumars are radioactive -- seriously.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top