Very, very good travel / all-around lens at a reasonable price.

DM393

New member
Messages
5
Reaction score
11
The Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 is really a pleasure to travel with. Reasonable weight (1.46 pounds), fast auto-focus, sharp throughout it's range (of course depending on the individual lens one receives, mine was excellent) , 77mm filter size.

Aside from a "nifty 50" (Sony f/1.8), this was the first variable I bought when I bought my Sony A7RIII. I rented the Sony 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3. That lens seemed to do a fair bit of focus hunting and while producing good images, it was a bit too slow for my needs. It just wasn't a lens I wanted to buy.

I borrowed the Sony 24-105mm f/4 from a friend and over the course of the weekend, I was highly impressed, to the point I purchased one from my local two story, dedicated camera store (and a large, local, dedicated camera store is a great thing to have access to).

As a 55% landscape/wildlife photographer, 35% astrophotographer, 10% family/friends photographer, the fact that it is not f/2.8 means little to me and my needs. In that 15% of imaging family/friends, in nearly all cases, the f/4 works very well. In those rare cases, indoors, in relatively dim light, f/4 still works nicely as the A7RIII allows a significant push in ISO.

Perfect lens? Of course not. That unicorn still doesn't exist and likely never will.

Bottom Line: The 24-105mm f/4 is a wonderful lens to travel with, and use on a day-to-day basis. My version is sharp from corner to corner. It does possess moderate vignetting and distortion, as should be expected from this lens, or any other lens of this focal length. Every professional photographer, and most dedicated amateurs, process their images post capture... and Lightroom handles these issues easily.

The 24-105 is a lens to be considered. If you rent this lens, I predict you will buy one.

(Had to throw this in here. When traveling, I use a LowePro Tahoe camera backpack and I really like it. In it I have my battery grip equipped A7RIII with 24-105mm attached, rainsuit, lens and sensor cleaning kits, spare batteries, my Sony 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 OSS, a Sony 1.4X teleconverter, i-Pad w/SD card adapter dongle, and a lot of other items. Pockets everywhere! This backpack is small, but allows a photographer to carry an amazing amount of equipment. At $70, it is a great product. Check it out at this Best Buy link but I suspect could be purchased from other vendors at even less. https://www.bestbuy.com/site/lowepro-tahoe-camera-backpack-gray/6333169.p?skuId=6333169)
 
Just to add some of my thoughts on this lens, I’ve been using it on vacation for the past two weeks and it’s almost glued on, only changing it out for a longer lens a few times. And I’m really impressed. Only purchased it a few weeks ago for travel and it’s living up to my expectations. I must say that despite it being f4.0 maximum aperture, the excellent OSS+IBIS of the A7RII allow quite reasonable images in low light such as these...

2f54a204548a48329b181b35ae92628d.jpg

Took this 2nd one accidentally at f8 and it’s still usable.

bfc494b2d81c4848bd552c4ab276f35b.jpg

I think the above image and this one below also show how useful 24mm as a starting FL is too.

3170be99e205450d96605829f5b1abc9.jpg

For travel, I think is tips out the also very good Tamron 28-75. And has effectively negated me carrying a bagful of primes.

--
Cheers, John
Quote: “If your pictures aren’t good enough, you’re not close enough.”, Robert Capa
 
Last edited:
Further to my previous post, here is a photo taken of some people about 500m away at 105mm and then a crop of the same scene. This level of detail in a single lens saves much lens swapping when time is pressing...



8014809031924a8b9a645d7781406083.jpg



ba095c3f70a84407a6cef5f7c1fdf06a.jpg



--
Cheers, John
Quote: “If your pictures aren’t good enough, you’re not close enough.”, Robert Capa
 
I have to agree with John. Only owned this lens about a week, and am amazed at the quality. I have first gen a7r so no in camera stabilization, and still not a problem with light being f4. I have also had the very pleasant realization that I no longer fight with myself about primes vs. zooms. With this lens, they both play an important roll for me. I must say, I’m not eager to pull this lens off and slap a prime on there.

Kevin
 
Further to my previous post, here is a photo taken of some people about 500m away at 105mm and then a crop of the same scene. This level of detail in a single lens saves much lens swapping when time is pressing...
Yes, and if you're shooting in a location with blowing dust, not having to swap lenses can save you a sensor cleaning and/or cloning out dust spots from your images later.
 
Last edited:
It's for now my one and only lens. Meets most of my photography needs. Would just like an affordable wildlife lens now. And also looking at a versatile fast lens for low light.
 
On the advice of some of the "YouTube" vloggers, I have purchased a small "star tracker". This will allow you to get excellent Milky Way photos even with a "slow" lens of F4 or even 5.6.

Of course it adds a bit more weight and you have to polar align it to get best results, but it is a viable option that also offers other capabilities.

I'm itching to use mine, but the weather hasn't been cooperating.

Cheers
i plan to do the exact same thing.. probably same vlogger :) very curious of the results. he seemed to say the cheap tracker sometimes doesnt work depending on temperature
Link please... 🤓
 
Your last point highlights one reason I am thinking about the RX10 iv
 
Your last point highlights one reason I am thinking about the RX10 iv
Before you do, spend some time comparing images of your A7RII and 24-105 with your RX100III. They’ll be close enough to an RX10IV in the common focal lengths to be fair comparisons. As good as my RX10III image quality was, it’s no match for a 42Mp FF one. In addition, my 7 month old RX100VI is in for service to get some dust removed, whereas I’m perfectly capable of removing sensor dust from an ILC myself. After a few months of regular use, my RX10III was consigned to the shelf and sold a couple months later. Good enough for non-critical photography but not as my main use camera.
 
Might be a good lens but no magic when it comes to image isolation or portrait pictures. Also might not be best combo for everyone.

I personally think the 24GM and Sony 85mm F1.8 would be best combo in both lowlight and day time
Would the 24 GM be better for astro than the 24-105 f/4?
The 1.4/24 mm is kind of de facto standard for more dedicated Milky way, starscapes and nothern light photography.

Reason is the balance between physical aperture (which determine how faint stars are recorded), f/number (which determine light density) and field of view.

The 4/24-105 is a bit slow (unless using a star tracker) and is not as well corrected as the fixed focus 1.4/24 GM. Night sky photographers are picky and notice defects which are hidden in ordinary images.

The 4/24-105 G is superb for ordinary photography.
 
Sorry don't agree. F4 just as well take an iPhone.
 
Oh and that F4 once you put your polariser on will be even slower.
 
Sorry don't agree. F4 just as well take an iPhone.
Says the guy with a 16-35/f4.0, 24-70/f4.0 and a 70-200/f4.0! I guess you leave them at home and take your iPhone instead! :-D
Well I have updated some of those so I need go and update my profile. I admit my post was a bit shock and awe but I really believe that you need all your zooms to be F2.8 and your primes F1.8 or better. It just gives you more scope when you are shooting. I love shallow depth of field and I get fed up with images which are sharp from to back. OK for landscape I suppose which is what I use the 16-35 and 70-200 for. By the way had the Tamron for 4 months now and loving it. Thats what you need to buy 24-70 at F2.8 great colours and sharp as hell.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top