PhotoTeach2
Forum Pro
And worse is that EVF-lag can be problematic both before the FIRST shot, but again after blackout when/if you need to take a SECOND (+) shots, (because you must "re-acquire" a moving subject again.For the second time in a week I've found myself referring to the famous statement attributed to Thomas Cardinal Wolsey, "Be very, very careful what you put in that head, because you will never, ever get it out."For the thousandth time, shutter lag is not related to EVF lag.https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
Geeze, I could have taught a brain-damaged rat this simple fact by now.
A whole group of mirrorless fans have "learned" something they read somewhere about "shutter lag." Whenever the word "lag" shows up in comments about mirrorless their reflex response swings into support the level of "shutter lag" present or not in mirrorless cameras. Someone put "shutter lag" into their head and it reflexively comes out as an argument on the totally different subject of EVF lag.
It is a common form of something akin to brain damage which could be called "information damage." Once the idea takes root, rooting it out takes acquisition of new knowledge, flexibility and thinking. Unfortunately the reflex usually overpowers those.
An experienced panner w/ SLR/dSLR could still retain a moving-subject in center of frame ... but EVF-lag means you are BEHIND the moving subject and must "catch-up" to re-center.
