Ricoh no longer a street photography camera

The Ricoh GR was never a speed demon for focus, yet it was since the first considered one of the very best street photographer cameras. Why's that?
Who considers the best ? Forums, reviews ? Even in the country it comes from it one of least used for street documentary.
Forums, reviews, photographers, blogs of photographers with street work. I'll admit I can make no claims for Japan, but as I pointed out, I can't just take your claims at face value.
Don't care what you believe. I live it everyday as I live in Japan and work at 3 photo galleries. Photographer in Japan don't worry about camera they worry about photo.
Hey that's great. Do you have a gallery somewhere where we can see your work?
I'm not in gallery I curate most film exhibitions. I'm old newspaper photographer and also not interested is exhibition.
Thanks for the reply would be great to see some of your work to out more weight to the claims
 
The Ricoh GR was never a speed demon for focus, yet it was since the first considered one of the very best street photographer cameras. Why's that?
Who considers the best ? Forums, reviews ? Even in the country it comes from it one of least used for street documentary.
Forums, reviews, photographers, blogs of photographers with street work. I'll admit I can make no claims for Japan, but as I pointed out, I can't just take your claims at face value.
Don't care what you believe. I live it everyday as I live in Japan and work at 3 photo galleries. Photographer in Japan don't worry about camera they worry about photo.
A photographer from anywhere still has to at some point consider and choose a camera when walking into a store. I suspect they all do "worry" and consider what to use otherwise there would be no used stores with shelves full of cameras and lenses.
There are far more Japanese walking in Tokyo with camera than I saw people in New York City for year. Still lot of film photographers here and people with 10 year old digital. People don't obsessed here.
 
With the slow focus, short battery life, no flash and image stabilisation Ricoh have created a small great ordinary camera. Being smaller than a smartphone is an advantage though the lack of flash is its achilles heel.

In good light the ricoh is a wonderful companion to a smartphone if one needs high resolution images as a stand alone street camera there are too many shortcomings.

My 1996 film GR still reigns supreme in the steets though it loses out in instant gratification

Will I buy a GRlll ?..........probably in a couple of years time

ps the 1996 GR is one of the few cameras that I have bought new and on release
I won't hate it so hard :)

The biggest problem I see are obviously smartphones. For the wideangle, big depth od field street/reportage photography focused more on content than picture quality, which would be the primary application for GR (IMO), the phones got really good.

If you look at Dmitry Markov's work done with iphone 7... it's amazing and that gap in picture quality is getting smaller with every generation of phones.

For landscape photography it would be a different story, but I don't think that is the reason most people buy the GR for.
I did...fantastic prime, Bayer CFA, easy to transport and excellent IQ for large prints. Now with 24mp and IBIS it's a stellar choice IMO. I'll definitely be upgrading in the nnext month or so.

Sal
I’ve shot tons of landscape photos with GRs. For years it was my primary walking and hiking camera. I’m still printing pictures from a series of long walks in Point Reyes National Seashore some years ago and they’re fantastic.

Small, light, wide angle lens - makes a great landscape camera.
Definitely wide enough for landscape or more so with 21mm
 
Ok a ordinary street camera for 2019 specs.
Why? What other camera is around that competes in this particular niche the GRiii is doing well?
Since the advent of smartphones the smsll so called small discrete camera no longer sits on top of the heap...mirrorless cameras offer a better choice.
Yes I guess most here rarely dabble in frantic street stuff
Why exactly is that? Why does the GRIii can't deal with "frantic street stuff?" Zone focusing seems more than apt for this task, no? Can you state what exactly makes the GRiii not apt for this? Zone focusing, faster startup than GRII suggests the GRiii can deal, right?
Fast Auto focusing is pretty vital, zone focusing cannot deal with the lack of f2.8 for pin point focusing
and want a small all round camera.

With the long time between drinks I expected Ricoh to really step up to the place so as a long time user I guess I am disappointed with the offering
Certainly you may be disappointed, there are others that like the idea- smaller, modern sensor, still good lens, faster startup, image stabilization that opens the door to more street work at night/lower light.

What exactly is missing here?
Slow low light focusing and image stabilisation is only useful if nothing moves
Slow low light focusing I'd agree with.

But there are plenty of times you want a slow shutter speed specifically *because* things are moving. IBIS is great for those times.

Shawn
 
Image stabilization is useful if nothing moves - true. It's a nice thing, not a requirement. Just like focusing on a camera with zone focus support like the Ricoh GR.
Image stabilization is useful if things are moving and you want motion blur. Then it is fantastic to have and a great tool.


Shawn
 
If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
True. And the GR III accommodates tiny wireless off-camera flash and multiple receivers while the XF10 has no such option.
How so?
 
If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
True. And the GR III accommodates tiny wireless off-camera flash and multiple receivers while the XF10 has no such option.
How so?
The XF-10 has no hot shoe so off-camera flash is limited to optical slave only with no on-camera power level control.

Sal
 
Last edited:
.

If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
Not true. Not everyone demands new or needs to dig into menu after camera is set up. Fuji x70 , Nikon A
 
.

If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
Not true. Not everyone demands new or needs to dig into menu after camera is set up. Fuji x70 , Nikon A
It is quite true, in my country the Fuji X70 is now premium price as its unavailable and some are priced as much as a new GR III from many. Nikon A is unobtainable, I have not seen any for a long time.
 
.

If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
Not true. Not everyone demands new or needs to dig into menu after camera is set up. Fuji x70 , Nikon A
It is quite true, in my country the Fuji X70 is now premium price as its unavailable and some are priced as much as a new GR III from many. Nikon A is unobtainable, I have not seen any for a long time.
The internet is world wide !
 
.

If anyone wants a ratio of smallest pocketable size, that still has excellent haptics but large sensor there is now only the GR and the Fuji XF10. From reports the XF10 suffers some operation speed the GR does not.
Not true. Not everyone demands new or needs to dig into menu after camera is set up. Fuji x70 , Nikon A
It is quite true, in my country the Fuji X70 is now premium price as its unavailable and some are priced as much as a new GR III from many. Nikon A is unobtainable, I have not seen any for a long time.
The internet is world wide !
Maybe, but postage of Lithium batteries with regards to used goods is restricted and difficult. Camera with no battery is not a lot of use except as a paperweight.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the user. I never use flash for street. The AF is arbitrary, I use snap or a custom saved MF distance. Battery has been fine so far, no complaints.

What it should have to become a really good street camera imo is a tilt screen. That for me is one of the best street features a camera can have (but absolutely not a fully articulated, thats useless for street imo and I rather have a fixed screen than that).
 
Depends on the user. I never use flash for street. The AF is arbitrary, I use snap or a custom saved MF distance. Battery has been fine so far, no complaints.

What it should have to become a really good street camera imo is a tilt screen. That for me is one of the best street features a camera can have (but absolutely not a fully articulated, thats useless for street imo and I rather have a fixed screen than that).
A fully articulated screen can tilt. What's the issue?

Sal
 
If you like it use it and enjoy it, it's just my thoughts. For me it is to big, slow, draws attention and fiddly with no added perks.
  • Tilt = Awesome,
  • Fixed = ok
  • Fully articulated = Deal breaker
 
I have never shot with a Ricoh GR but I was really looking forward to the GRIII. But now after reading so much negatives about the GRIII – bad battery life, slow AF, not that good dynamic range, wobbly dial, camera's bluetooth can not connect to iPhone/iPad, the camera gets very warm after a short usage, recalls in Korea and Japan, talk of that the camera is still in beta-stage... I'm dissappointed and no longer know if I will buy the GRIII. Maybe in a year when they fix everything.
 
I have never shot with a Ricoh GR but I was really looking forward to the GRIII. But now after reading so much negatives about the GRIII – bad battery life, slow AF, not that good dynamic range, wobbly dial, camera's bluetooth can not connect to iPhone/iPad, the camera gets very warm after a short usage, recalls in Korea and Japan, talk of that the camera is still in beta-stage... I'm dissappointed and no longer know if I will buy the GRIII. Maybe in a year when they fix everything.
I my experience so far,
  • Battery ok
  • AF ok (use snap anyway)
  • Insanely good Dynamic Range
  • Dial ok
  • Bluetooth will connect as soon as they update. This is a made up issue. It's like when a new non-ricoh camera isn't supported in LR, every one knows we just have to wait a little.
  • No temperature issue.
Real disappointments for me are less buttons, no tilt and no flash. So it's not perfect. But I haven't experienced any of the things you listed :)
 
If you like it use it and enjoy it, it's just my thoughts. For me it is to big, slow, draws attention and fiddly with no added perks.
Are we talking about the same thing? Which fully articulated screen camera are you referring to? In simple tilt mode why would it be slow, too big, fiddly and draw attention?

Some of the perks for me is composing and shooting at waist, chest, ground level in vertical (portrait orientation) and the ability to compose sideways and from above when desired. YMMV.
  • Tilt = Awesome,
  • Fixed = ok
  • Fully articulated = Deal breaker
Sal
 
I have never shot with a Ricoh GR but I was really looking forward to the GRIII. But now after reading so much negatives about the GRIII – bad battery life, slow AF, not that good dynamic range, wobbly dial, camera's bluetooth can not connect to iPhone/iPad, the camera gets very warm after a short usage, recalls in Korea and Japan, talk of that the camera is still in beta-stage... I'm dissappointed and no longer know if I will buy the GRIII. Maybe in a year when they fix everything.
I think the first go-around of GrIII's have issues but to look at this overall thread and to say that the Ricoh is not a street camera is pretty bogus.

Who cares if the dial is wobbly....or lack of bluetooth or connection to iPhone etc....it is the camera and the images taken from that camera that count.

If I can use my Leica M3 from 1963 and take effective street shots.....is that the camera or me? The camera is film so I am limited to 36 per roll, the camera is 'heavy' and really heavy after caring it around for a few hours....and I need to really know my photo basics (exposure, shutter etc etc) in order to take images. If I compared 'all of that' with just about any digital camera I would say that the Leica is a poor camera. But really? A poor Leica? No.... it all comes down to me as a photographer as to the quality of my images.

Same with the Ricoh.....it is a perfect street camera. Small...... Great images.... easy to use. Do I really need an unwobbly button or bluetooth to make it a street camera? If so, if so....perhaps you less of a 'photographer' and more of a 'camera option junky'...
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top