Al Downie
Senior Member
HI all,
From time to time I stick my X100 onto the eyepiece of a birding telescope, and it works pretty well (around the equivalent of an 850mm lens, at the minimum scope zoom setting). But I've always had to work around a weird problem:
At f2 (wide open on the X100), when using Aperture Priority, the exposure seems accurate and what I see in the EVF matches the final image. If I stop down to anything smaller than f2 however, then as soon as I half-depress the shutter release, the EVF flares into overexposure and this is matched in the final image too. I can use the exposure compensation dial to correct it, provided I don't go smaller than f4. As soon as I take the camera away from the scope, it behaves perfectly normally again.
If any of you have seen this behaviour, or can figure out what might be going on, I'd be very grateful for any advice.
In case anyone hasn't heard of digiscoping before, here's an example of the kind of magnification that can be achieved: if you view the image below at 100%, you'll see a mosquito about half-way up the left-hand side of the image - it's a fluke that it happened to be in the field of focus at the time, but you can see its legs, from about 30m away!
Anyway - thanks again for any pointers about the exposure behaviour.

--
Flickr photos: https://flic.kr/s/aHsjXbgGu9
From time to time I stick my X100 onto the eyepiece of a birding telescope, and it works pretty well (around the equivalent of an 850mm lens, at the minimum scope zoom setting). But I've always had to work around a weird problem:
At f2 (wide open on the X100), when using Aperture Priority, the exposure seems accurate and what I see in the EVF matches the final image. If I stop down to anything smaller than f2 however, then as soon as I half-depress the shutter release, the EVF flares into overexposure and this is matched in the final image too. I can use the exposure compensation dial to correct it, provided I don't go smaller than f4. As soon as I take the camera away from the scope, it behaves perfectly normally again.
If any of you have seen this behaviour, or can figure out what might be going on, I'd be very grateful for any advice.
In case anyone hasn't heard of digiscoping before, here's an example of the kind of magnification that can be achieved: if you view the image below at 100%, you'll see a mosquito about half-way up the left-hand side of the image - it's a fluke that it happened to be in the field of focus at the time, but you can see its legs, from about 30m away!
Anyway - thanks again for any pointers about the exposure behaviour.

--
Flickr photos: https://flic.kr/s/aHsjXbgGu9