When I was considering the Sony 20mm f/2.8 lens, I read & watched everything that I could find and it all boiled down to the owners' attitudes toward the lens. For those chasing perfection, it wasn't perfect enough. For those happy with the results, it was a great little lens.
I finally decided to purchase it and am delighted with it! I use this lens on an a5100 for short video clips where I am in front of the camera. I think it works fine for my application. It's been decades since I did anything resembling street photography (using Nikon film cameras). In my film camera days, I made extensive use of 50mm (non-crop camera). Using a Sony APS-C camera, a 35mm lens would closely approximate that same field of view and I would be inclined to use that focal length for street photography.
Jim
Thanks Jim. I think I am going to purchase the 35 1.8 like you mentioned. The OSS, speed, and focal length will probably serve me well. Guess we shall see soon!
I have a tendency to take awhile to research my purchases (my wife would probably say that I over-think the pros and cons). From my film days, I am pretty settled on my preferred focal lengths such as my regard for the "Nifty fifty" (50mm on the old 35mm SLRs). When it comes to the attributes of a lens, I want to read/watch everything I can to understand what I am buying. I did end up purchasing the 35mm f/1.8 Sony lens but I remember spending extra time pondering the purchase. I remember that this YouTube video gave me some details to ponder:
.
Good luck!
Jim
I live a few blocks from B&H so I can always test a lens for 30 days before making final decision. I usually keep, but did return the 24mm 1.8 after a week's use - did not seem worth the hefty weight and price for my purposes.
I have both the 35mm 1.8 and the 20mm 2.8. They are both fine, tiny and light lenses, with significant FL and speed differences as well as OSS. For their appropriate purposes, both are great.