Went to an EM1x Launch Event

I dragged along a bag of older FT lenses to try. The 150/2 is dynamite on the EM1x. It's more comfortable to use on the bigger body, focuses well, and is going to be a very usable match. They really should come out with that lens again with an updated focus motor ... it would be an amazing combo for youth sports, weddings, etc.
I was very interested to hear that your 150mm F2 performed so well. My all-time favourite lens.

But I would warn any enthusiast thinking of finding one for their collection. Olympus no longer support it. The electronics suddenly failed on mine, focus unobtainable. Even MF does not work because it is focus by wire. It is now an optically perfect expensive lump!

My official Olympus agency tested it and they said "sorry, but Olympus no longer support this lens". I even wrote to Olympus Japan, but they did not reply.

Cheers,

Don
They still list it in the US as one that they repair but I agree that at this point in time purchasing the more expensive 4/3 lenses is not a good idea. I'm hopeful that the video leak at the Hamburg rollout of a 150 f2 PRO is not a mistake. With eight new lenses coming out this year things look promising, and bank account draining...!
Hi.

After I was told electronic parts were no longer procurable, I contacted Olympus USA, and they said freight the lens to them to fix. I was not confident that their reply was any more informed than a standard response email, so I asked again explaining what I had been told here. They replied to say that they had now looked into it, and indeed electronics could not be replaced. I presume they can make mechanical or optical fixes maybe. I don't know if it's the same case for the other 4/3 lenses.

This has put me right off buying top quality expensive lenses, at least Olympus ones.

Cheers,

Don
That's unfortunate. However I wouldn't take it as a warning against current gear. If Olympus had continued the original DSLR series then they would no doubt have continued to make the lens and support it. After all, once they make back the development cost it's all gravy from then on. I found out however that the Hamburg video was in error, it was the SHG, not a new lens, so nothing replaces the 150 f2 as of now. With the introduction of their third PDAF body though, I finally am convinced that m43 will be around for a while. I've been nothing but impressed with the 12-100 I bought last summer so I am anxious to see what new lenses Olympus might offer this year.
 
I dragged along a bag of older FT lenses to try. The 150/2 is dynamite on the EM1x. It's more comfortable to use on the bigger body, focuses well, and is going to be a very usable match. They really should come out with that lens again with an updated focus motor ... it would be an amazing combo for youth sports, weddings, etc.
I was very interested to hear that your 150mm F2 performed so well. My all-time favourite lens.

But I would warn any enthusiast thinking of finding one for their collection. Olympus no longer support it. The electronics suddenly failed on mine, focus unobtainable. Even MF does not work because it is focus by wire. It is now an optically perfect expensive lump!

My official Olympus agency tested it and they said "sorry, but Olympus no longer support this lens". I even wrote to Olympus Japan, but they did not reply.

Cheers,

Don
Thanks for the info. I hope I can some more years of use out of mine before the inevitable end.

I'd have a hard time throwing it in the trash. Probably bury it on beach somewhere. You know ... 'from sand to sand'.

--
Jeff
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jck_photos/sets/
 
Last edited:
Last time the SHG repair problem came up someone said the name of a 3rd party repair facility that had bought out the remaining spare parts and still offered service after Olympus stopped.

I haven't had much luck searching mu43 forum for the exact name. My memory wants to.say it started with a "T" and was in Canada.
 
Nice reports, thanks.

Did anyone get chance to try the orientation-specific focus point positioning? As long as it works swiftly and reliably it would be a seemingly-small, but so practical a feature, especially when combined with the focus joysticks.

For example, while observing a big cat at rest you could set up the points for landscape and portrait orientations, and you’d be immediately there or thereabouts when the animal moved and you wanted to frame it differently.

As it is with the Mii, you have to mess about with the often unreliable tracking pad or fiddly 4-way buttons, and by the time you’re set up correctly the subject has stopped doing the interesting bit of transient behaviour you wanted to catch, and has moved to do something else!
 
Last time the SHG repair problem came up someone said the name of a 3rd party repair facility that had bought out the remaining spare parts and still offered service after Olympus stopped.

I haven't had much luck searching mu43 forum for the exact name. My memory wants to.say it started with a "T" and was in Canada.
That made me think about KEH. While I've never used their service, they make repairs and likely can cannibalize for parts, but they don't take international orders. Is Precision Camera actually Olympus' repairer? I'm confused on their relationship to Olympus. If tgey are independent then maybe them?
 
Last time the SHG repair problem came up someone said the name of a 3rd party repair facility that had bought out the remaining spare parts and still offered service after Olympus stopped.

I haven't had much luck searching mu43 forum for the exact name. My memory wants to.say it started with a "T" and was in Canada.
Might it have been http://www.trinitek.ca ?
 
That is a shame. Probably they think they can't sell enough of them to make the R&D and tooling cost back. Small company. Have to put everything into M43 and hope to survive I guess.
 
Did I take this one with the 50/2? Don't have the software on this PC to look but don't see the lens name come up so maybe. Old photo on a PM1 reduced for email. I like it well enough. might have take it with an OM lens. Pretty creamy for the 50/2 but maybe. Tiny flowers.

e3d3729419754d619200daacd56a8194.jpg

7cbc7a47668b42a286358f70d71c9299.jpg

Pretty sure the mosquito photo was taken with the 50/2. Didn't see it or I would have focused on it. When I first bought the lens, focused on the grain on the back of the chair to test. Could have been a great mosquito photo.
 
Last edited:
I went to the EM1x Launch Event held at the CameraMall in Ann Arbor last night. Nice event complete with wine and cheese.

They had 6-8 or so bodies out for handling along with four knowledgable people from Olympus to answer questions. They had the cameras mounted with a selection of different lenses including the 12-100/4, 17/1.2, 25/1.2, 45/1.2, a couple with the 60 mm, and maybe a few more. There a short program and a couple of short videos to watch including one from Joe Edelman. Nice but nothing you haven't seen before.

Overall, the body feels great in my rather large hands. It feels pretty light, too. Frankly, I think the ergonomics are improved by a little more spacing on the buttons. The menu system is still a mess (though the feature forward). The dual joysticks are perfectly placed and intuitive. The custom buttons on the front are nicely placed.

I dragged along a bag of older FT lenses to try. The 150/2 is dynamite on the EM1x. It's more comfortable to use on the bigger body, focuses well, and is going to be a very usable match. They really should come out with that lens again with an updated focus motor ... it would be an amazing combo for youth sports, weddings, etc.

My old 7-14/4 seemed to work fine.

I also tried the old FT 50/2 macro. It would still hunt when trying to shoot at scale, and focus bracketing was greyed out on the menu. But that old lens has never worked so well from about 3 feet and out. One of the Olympus guys went out of his way to say the 50/2 is still a good optical performer.

Another gentleman brought along 14-35/2 and the 35-100/2 which also paired nicely with the EM1x. The old FT lenses are not up to the speed of the newer but otherwise have never worked better.

For me, the 60mm macro was a minor revelation. It looks a little silly on the bigger body, but is straightforward to use and is pretty sweet with focus stacking.

They did have a deal if you ordered at the show. The deal included two extra batteries (total of four), a dual battery charger, and an additional 2 years of Olympus warranty (total of three years). That sealed the deal for me so I order a copy.

I'm still wrestling with what lenses to add to the kit. I have the 300/4, 12-40/2.8 pro, and some of the f/1.8 primes. I tried out the 40-150/2.8 pro and the 12-100/4 pro. Either would be a sweet addition. The 12-100 would likely be on the camera 90% of the time, but gives up a stop and a little on the long end.

Right now I'm thinking of adding the 12-100/4 for most shooting, and the 17/1.2 to cover lower light settings.
Depends what you shoot..

The 12-100mmf4 is a great walkabout lens, and, very sharp. Not as sharp as the 40-150mmf2.8. Based on experience with both lenses on an EM1.2
 
Did I take this one with the 50/2? Don't have the software on this PC to look but don't see the lens name come up so maybe. Old photo on a PM1 reduced for email. I like it well enough. might have take it with an OM lens. Pretty creamy for the 50/2 but maybe. Tiny flowers.

e3d3729419754d619200daacd56a8194.jpg

7cbc7a47668b42a286358f70d71c9299.jpg

Pretty sure the mosquito photo was taken with the 50/2. Didn't see it or I would have focused on it. When I first bought the lens, focused on the grain on the back of the chair to test. Could have been a great mosquito photo.
When the conversation wanders from technical test results to "how does it look?" these are great examples of image rendering (in the hands of somebody able to leverage it) being the most important thing a lens-camera combination can produce. The fuchsias are divine.

Cheers,

Rick

--
Equivalence and diffraction-free since 2009.
You can be too; ask about our 12-step program.
 
I swear this is pure luck. Just use a background that's way back. Whatever it is, I love the concept that a fossil of a 12MP camera like this one, you can buy for less than $100 with virtually no physical controls, you can fit in a shirt pocket with a body cap or maybe a compact zoom or prime like the 17 f/2.8, can make an image like this one with whatever lens I adapted on it OM or 50/2.

Is this not the idea of small camera - good image or what?

I love the OM 50 /1.4 and 135 /2.8 BTW. The 200 f/4 is almost as good but with the 40-150PRO don't need it except it's very small for the FL. The 135 f/2.8 is tiny. If I were better at focusing it I would have kept the 50 /1.2. Maybe not the smartest thing I ever didn't do. MF no problem with MF assist. Even I can do it.

Where did that mosquito go? Under a foot of snow. Anybody look at the snowfall in Seattle?
 
2 days ago I checked out my Little Tuna on the EM1X and was surprised that if the F was set at 2.0 It fired very fast. Sounded like at 18fps. The minute I increase f stop to 2.2 the firing slowed down.

So do check this out when you have a chance to verify my experience. Not sure the sample I tried out was pre production.

Was trying to shoot pigeon in flight and the shutter certainly fires very fast and captured the subject in frame which is better than my experience with my EM1.2/300f4( blank frames). But unfortunate my focus was set to spot. Sharpness not there. Oh I prefer the color of the EM1X to EM1.2 - more neutral.

Planning to go back to the shop tomorrow and set the AF to Center TrackingPriority to check out pigeon in flight. I am hoping it can perform up to my A9. Been using both A9 for birding( super cam for BIF) and OlyEM1.2/300f4 for super still birds. The advantages of Oly combo: lighter, can handhold down to 1/8 sec for birds in very low light, and that extended reach of 2400mm using digital zoom in JPEG over the A9.

Love both systems equally for birding.

ric

Great report, thanks! My local event is on the 15th. Really good to hear the 150/2 will focus equal to better (it sounds like at least a bit!) on the new camera, this has got to be a pretty important feature for quite a few potential users! Another user report said performance of the 90-250/2.8 was much improved.

Jan
 
2 days ago I checked out my Little Tuna on the EM1X and was surprised that if the F was set at 2.0 It fired very fast. Sounded like at 18fps. The minute I increase f stop to 2.2 the firing slowed down.

So do check this out when you have a chance to verify my experience. Not sure the sample I tried out was pre production.
That describes mine. Much faster rate wide open, which is consistent with the other two E-M1 models.

Cheers,

Rick
 
2 days ago I checked out my Little Tuna on the EM1X and was surprised that if the F was set at 2.0 It fired very fast. Sounded like at 18fps. The minute I increase f stop to 2.2 the firing slowed down.

So do check this out when you have a chance to verify my experience. Not sure the sample I tried out was pre production.
That describes mine. Much faster rate wide open, which is consistent with the other two E-M1 models.
I have found when shooting with e-shutter, I can hear the difference between the aperture mechanism speeds in various lens, which will affect higher frame rates. My 12-40 and 7-14 are lightning fast, the 40-150R is slower, and the 50/2 FT lens is *much* slower. Not sure whether the difference is in the actual aperture mechanisms, or due to a lower data rate in the FT protocol vs mFT.
 
You bet. Its a macro lens. If you have an adaptor for an M43 camera, you can use it instead of the 60mm f/2.8 with some limitations. Slower focus, but not bad on an EM-1. Once you take the first shot, you can keep shooting away if you set the camera so it doesn't start the focus cycle over.

Its brighter and you use MF for macro a lot anyway. Can't shoot in-camera focus stacks though. Can't make as deep a DOF without stacking on a computer or hitting diffraction.

It shoots warmer than M43 lenses. I like the way it renders.
 
Last edited:
Right now I'm thinking of adding the 12-100/4 for most shooting, and the 17/1.2 to cover lower light settings.
Both of these are excellent choices. I used both on my recent trip to the Middle East. The 17mm f/1.2 performs very well in low light. I was able to get quite clear and appealing night time shots with various degrees of background lighting.
 
Right now I'm thinking of adding the 12-100/4 for most shooting, and the 17/1.2 to cover lower light settings.
Both of these are excellent choices. I used both on my recent trip to the Middle East. The 17mm f/1.2 performs very well in low light. I was able to get quite clear and appealing night time shots with various degrees of background lighting.
That's exactly the use case I had in mind. The extra light for evening and night shots is hard to beat.
 
Right now I'm thinking of adding the 12-100/4 for most shooting, and the 17/1.2 to cover lower light settings.
Both of these are excellent choices. I used both on my recent trip to the Middle East. The 17mm f/1.2 performs very well in low light. I was able to get quite clear and appealing night time shots with various degrees of background lighting.
That's exactly the use case I had in mind. The extra light for evening and night shots is hard to beat.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top