Bisonbison
Leading Member
In the past, if you used and Exif Editor to change your camera model you would have access to the newer film sims....Also is it possible to add it to one of these files using the Fuji raw converter (based on silkypix)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the past, if you used and Exif Editor to change your camera model you would have access to the newer film sims....Also is it possible to add it to one of these files using the Fuji raw converter (based on silkypix)?
Possibly because of the ambient light differences causing more shifts than desirable.Hi atalwar. This is a great idea and I hope you update this with many more options. I initially had followed some recipe ideas found here, but I found that the custom WB settings of some of them affected my end result more than I wanted them to. I thus have removed any custom WB options for now.
Don't it close to Velvia - more colors, more shadows, more red, instead magenta (in the Velvia blue) ?+1 to astia travel. It's a very versatile simulation that can be used for just about anything and produce beautiful colors.
Thanks I will give it try. Actually I use Astia as main film.It's close to velvia, yes, but I think it does skin tones much better. They don't appear oversaturated. Instead, they look natural and healthy. I've modified it slightly for the X-T10. I think it's a bit milder on color and sharpness than the reccomended, which was for the X-T2 if I remember right. Remember that the X-T10 goes on a scale from -2 to 2.
I tried some of the "portrait" skin tones using desaturated profiles but I really didn't like them. Made people look dead. Too grey for my liking. I don't post personal pics online, so It's tough to show and tell, but here's the settings I use. Try it out for yourself! Great landscapes, cityscapes, and portraits.
Astia
Color +1
Sharpness +1
White balance: auto +1R
Highlight: -1
Shadow: +1
Noise reduction: -1
Fascinating articles. I had never read as much about the different simulations but this has ended up making me wonder whether I'm doing it all wrong.Here;s a Nice Read from The Makers themselves, where they explain each of their film simulation and where it stands so we all can make informed decisions/choices.
https://fujifilm-x.com/global/stories/the-world-of-film-simulation-episode-1/
Well, colors is matter of personal taste, if you are not a pro, and need to meet some expectations. I am not pro and I shoot as I like - and I like live colors.Fascinating articles. I had never read as much about the different simulations but this has ended up making me wonder whether I'm doing it all wrong.Here;s a Nice Read from The Makers themselves, where they explain each of their film simulation and where it stands so we all can make informed decisions/choices.
https://fujifilm-x.com/global/stories/the-world-of-film-simulation-episode-1/
As with most people, when it comes to colour photography, I started with classic chrome. I still like it but I decided to switch since it felt too 'used'. I have, since then, moved to Astia and have been enjoying it quite a while. But I had not realised that it's primarily a portrait lens and that the 'soft' part is just for skin tones. I guess it makes sense now that I've been adding negative points to the colour option. I generally like less saturated images.
The chart made me wonder: what should I be using? But Pro Neg Hi. and Pro Neg Std. which seem to be more my style according to the chart, both are also meant to be for portraiture.
Does anyone use either for travel etc.?
agree - but if the "fun" can be amped by more control (insert diabolical, unhinged laughter) it is all the better.Well, colors is matter of personal taste, if you are not a pro, and need to meet some expectations. I am not pro and I shoot as I like - and I like live colors.Fascinating articles. I had never read as much about the different simulations but this has ended up making me wonder whether I'm doing it all wrong.Here;s a Nice Read from The Makers themselves, where they explain each of their film simulation and where it stands so we all can make informed decisions/choices.
https://fujifilm-x.com/global/stories/the-world-of-film-simulation-episode-1/
As with most people, when it comes to colour photography, I started with classic chrome. I still like it but I decided to switch since it felt too 'used'. I have, since then, moved to Astia and have been enjoying it quite a while. But I had not realised that it's primarily a portrait lens and that the 'soft' part is just for skin tones. I guess it makes sense now that I've been adding negative points to the colour option. I generally like less saturated images.
The chart made me wonder: what should I be using? But Pro Neg Hi. and Pro Neg Std. which seem to be more my style according to the chart, both are also meant to be for portraiture.
Does anyone use either for travel etc.?
I never used ProNeg simulations, but when I look at photos made with them... they remember me of the photos of Nikon cameras. They are so muted! I have few friend using Nikons and always can recognize their photos. The people looks strange, I can not explain it, but do not like it.
So I almost all the time use Astia, sometimes outside I use Velvia, but it can be too contrast sometimes.
At home, evening I put NR to +2, and because there are lot of black and white objects I put Shadows to -2, and as always - Color Chrome effect to Strong.
Shoot whatever you like you photos to beThe fun is most important part
![]()
Thx, The Source url are in the last column of the spreadsheet.It would be unfair to not give credits where they are due.Great work. Two suggestions:
1) can you list the source for these recipe? URL?
2) Please label Xtrans generation in the worksheet tab. Hopefully someone can provide some film simulations setting for xtrans 1, and 2.
Thank you.