What is so good about the F828?

Bobby Tan

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
430
Reaction score
0
Location
Long Beach, US
What is so good about the Sony F828? Let me count the ways .....

1. The Lens. The Carl Zeiss lens is legendary, and second only to a Leica/Leitz lens. The Zeiss T* proprietary multi-coating is as close as you will get to the Zeiss T* coated lenses for the Contax SLR and medium format cameras. Previous F-series models are not T* coated. The color balance and color fidelity of Zeiss lenses is incredible.

The zoom coverage and speed of the lens is superior to the F717. Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage, and the F2.0 - F2.8 speed is incredibly fast, so you can shoot in ISO 100 even when the light level is very low. The new/improved lens alone is worth the upgrade from the F717, in my view.

2. The Body. The body is a radical improvement over earlier models. It is a lot beefier/heftier than the earlier models. The tough magnesium alloy material is the same material that is being used in the more expensive pro SLRs. It certainly feels more like an SLR in your hands than the F717. This is certainly no cheap plastic camera like most point-and-shoots, and some entry level SLRs. This tough and rigid body can stand years of heavy use and abuse. For some, this reason alone would justify buying this camera.

3. The New Sensor. 8 million pixels. 4-color RGBE CCD. A marketing gimmick? Ask Nikon. Rumor has it that Nikon is incorporating this new Sony sensor into their latest Coolpix 8000 model. How Cool is that? Noise? What noise? All the images we have seen so far are from pre-production samples, and pre-production tests are as reliable as the polls. Even then, some of the recent samples look very impressive - clean and noiseless. Who do you want to believe? Don't believe either. Wait for the REAL test results. But if Nikon is willing to bank their reputation on this new sensor, I am sold. I mean, who would you put your trust in - members of this forum or Sony and Nikon put together?

4. File Capture. Not happy with just JPEG? Well, you can now get RAW+JPEG with every shot that you take. You will only find this feature in the latest D-SLRs. The F828 also feature an astounding 14-bit A/D converter. Theoretically therefore i.e. depending on your level of skill/expertise, with a RAW file and the new sensor (and if you use your live histogram correctly) you can now (with the F828) take your pictures to a HIGHER level than the remarkably stunning images taken by "T GLOW with the F717:

http://www.usefilm.com/browse.php?offset=0&data=13937&mode=port&thispage=Community

5. Storage. 1GB Memory Stick Pro is not good enough for you? Stick a 4GB Compact Flash card in ... or have both of them in the camera. The F828 allows you to do this, so you can keep shooting in RAW+JPRG mode. Even the top professional cameras cannot offer you this feature.

6. Live Histogram. This is essential if you want your original images to be of the highest possible quality. You don't want to rely on the camera's auto exposure/metering recommendation, the same way that professional photographers do not always rely on the in-camera metering system. The histogram enables you to meter the scene A LOT more accurately. The histogram function is your built-in hand-held meter for precise metering and total control.

7. Speed of Operation. I understand the F828 will be even faster than the F717 ... in start-up time (less than 2 sec), capture/write speed with almost zero shutter lag, fast auto-focussing, and a very high transfer speed with USB 2.0. By comparison, the 300D connectivity is USB 1.1.

8. Hot Shoe. The hot shoe is a real hot shoe, so you have all of the advantages of using a powerful external flash unit with off-camera flash capability (I think).

9. Auto and Manual Modes. Expose in auto or manual. Focus in auto or manual. Zoom in manual for more precise framing. Some entry-level D-SLRs don't even allow you to do this.

10. Movie/video clip, IR photography, live preview, swiveling LCD, 5-point focussing, NightShot, NightFraming, auto-focus illumination lamp for focussing in total darkness, noise-reduction features, white balance options, in-camera picture effects and image parameters, and what-have-you.

Now ... can you name me one other camera (prosumer or D-SLR) that has all of the above features and still retail at $1,200? The image quality coming out of this camera is no less than maybe 70% of a D-SLR with an APS-size or even full-frame sensor ... and it's looking increasingly likely that it will be closer to 90%. All this is speculation, of course, but we will know this for a fact soon enough when we have actual test reports of this dream camera.

Obviously the F828 is not for everyone, and certainly not for most pros, as it is not a systems camera and it will not allow you to change lenses. But for those amongst us (non pros) who would rather travel light and have a digital camera that is as good as most D-SLRs in terms of image capture quality, this is the camera. The Minolta A1 comes very close, and it offers image stabilization, but the F828 is my pick ... because of the Zeiss lens.

Thank you, Sony, for putting out a very fine digital camera at an affordable price! :)
 
What is so good about the Sony F828? Let me count the ways .....
1. The Lens. The Carl Zeiss lens is legendary, and second only to
a Leica/Leitz lens. The Zeiss T* proprietary multi-coating is as
close as you will get to the Zeiss T* coated lenses for the Contax
SLR and medium format cameras. Previous F-series models are not T*
coated. The color balance and color fidelity of Zeiss lenses is
incredible.

The zoom coverage and speed of the lens is superior to the F717.
Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage, and the F2.0 - F2.8
speed is incredibly fast, so you can shoot in ISO 100 even when the
light level is very low. The new/improved lens alone is worth the
upgrade from the F717, in my view.

2. The Body. The body is a radical improvement over earlier
models. It is a lot beefier/heftier than the earlier models. The
tough magnesium alloy material is the same material that is being
used in the more expensive pro SLRs. It certainly feels more like
an SLR in your hands than the F717. This is certainly no cheap
plastic camera like most point-and-shoots, and some entry level
SLRs. This tough and rigid body can stand years of heavy use and
abuse. For some, this reason alone would justify buying this
camera.

3. The New Sensor. 8 million pixels. 4-color RGBE CCD. A
marketing gimmick? Ask Nikon. Rumor has it that Nikon is
incorporating this new Sony sensor into their latest Coolpix 8000
model. How Cool is that? Noise? What noise? All the images we
have seen so far are from pre-production samples, and
pre-production tests are as reliable as the polls. Even then, some
of the recent samples look very impressive - clean and noiseless.
Who do you want to believe? Don't believe either. Wait for the
REAL test results. But if Nikon is willing to bank their
reputation on this new sensor, I am sold. I mean, who would you
put your trust in - members of this forum or Sony and Nikon put
together?

4. File Capture. Not happy with just JPEG? Well, you can now get
RAW+JPEG with every shot that you take. You will only find this
feature in the latest D-SLRs. The F828 also feature an astounding
14-bit A/D converter. Theoretically therefore i.e. depending on
your level of skill/expertise, with a RAW file and the new sensor
(and if you use your live histogram correctly) you can now (with
the F828) take your pictures to a HIGHER level than the remarkably
stunning images taken by "T GLOW with the F717:

http://www.usefilm.com/browse.php?offset=0&data=13937&mode=port&thispage=Community

5. Storage. 1GB Memory Stick Pro is not good enough for you?
Stick a 4GB Compact Flash card in ... or have both of them in the
camera. The F828 allows you to do this, so you can keep shooting
in RAW+JPRG mode. Even the top professional cameras cannot offer
you this feature.

6. Live Histogram. This is essential if you want your original
images to be of the highest possible quality. You don't want to
rely on the camera's auto exposure/metering recommendation, the
same way that professional photographers do not always rely on the
in-camera metering system. The histogram enables you to meter the
scene A LOT more accurately. The histogram function is your
built-in hand-held meter for precise metering and total control.

7. Speed of Operation. I understand the F828 will be even faster
than the F717 ... in start-up time (less than 2 sec), capture/write
speed with almost zero shutter lag, fast auto-focussing, and a very
high transfer speed with USB 2.0. By comparison, the 300D
connectivity is USB 1.1.

8. Hot Shoe. The hot shoe is a real hot shoe, so you have all of
the advantages of using a powerful external flash unit with
off-camera flash capability (I think).

9. Auto and Manual Modes. Expose in auto or manual. Focus in
auto or manual. Zoom in manual for more precise framing. Some
entry-level D-SLRs don't even allow you to do this.

10. Movie/video clip, IR photography, live preview, swiveling LCD,
5-point focussing, NightShot, NightFraming, auto-focus illumination
lamp for focussing in total darkness, noise-reduction features,
white balance options, in-camera picture effects and image
parameters, and what-have-you.

Now ... can you name me one other camera (prosumer or D-SLR) that
has all of the above features and still retail at $1,200? The
image quality coming out of this camera is no less than maybe 70%
of a D-SLR with an APS-size or even full-frame sensor ... and it's
looking increasingly likely that it will be closer to 90%. All
this is speculation, of course, but we will know this for a fact
soon enough when we have actual test reports of this dream camera.

Obviously the F828 is not for everyone, and certainly not for most
pros, as it is not a systems camera and it will not allow you to
change lenses. But for those amongst us (non pros) who would
rather travel light and have a digital camera that is as good as
most D-SLRs in terms of image capture quality, this is the camera.
The Minolta A1 comes very close, and it offers image stabilization,
but the F828 is my pick ... because of the Zeiss lens.

Thank you, Sony, for putting out a very fine digital camera at an
affordable price! :)
--
Hewy
F717
member.home.nl/huub.vermeulen
  • ask not what a digicam can do for you, ask yourself what you can do with a digicam *
 
Shallow DOF capability with beautiful bokeh ?
(IMO this is what makes the difference between digicam & SLR shots.)

Once a Sony XXX camera can deliver shallow DOF, it will be a different story, until that time, no comparison.

What about low noise ? Neat-image is not a solution but a sad workaround for shortcomings of your device.

Bleeding or purple fringing ? I don't want it, do you ?

This is the only thing that I have seen from the images that were posted from this camera. Those are the real image quality parameters, to me, at this point, it doesn't look good....at all.

You can make yourself believe it looks good....but IMO you are just fooling yourself.

Ofcourse, people will say : I have printed the images and I don't see the purple fringing.....well let me wake you up, it is there, but your printer is not good enough to print the details. It does not make the image better, as it is there, and we all can see it on screen, same applies for the bleeding colors.

The complaint about DSLRs and their soft shots....what about the 828 ?? Sharpness ? it is hard to find.

Another complaint about dslr's : those things are huge....
Now the 828 is (almost) here, it is not exactly small now is it ?
No-one is complaining anylonger about the size....

the USB connection is a non-issue and for me they shouldn't have to put it in in the first place.

If I want to make movies....I will buy a videocamera.

Have fun with your future 828....!

BaKMaN
--
http://www.digitallyactive.com
 
Shallow DOF capability with beautiful bokeh ?
(IMO this is what makes the difference between digicam & SLR shots.)

Once a Sony XXX camera can deliver shallow DOF, it will be a
different story, until that time, no comparison.
Quite obviously you don't know much about photography techniques. There are so many tricks you can employ for a shallower DOF, like shooting at F2, moving closer to your subject, increasing the distance of your subject and background, and doing it with post-processing software. I would rather do these things then buy super-expensive fast lenses.
 
I meant "between" your subject and background.

Anyway, if you are shooting lanscapes/scenics, architetural subjects, macro and closeup, you WANT more DOF, and that has been the deficiency with with SLRs.

Besides, I didn't say that the F828 is perfect, and is a camera for everyone. It's horses for courses. Be as happy with your D-SLR, as I know I will be happy with the F828.
Shallow DOF capability with beautiful bokeh ?
(IMO this is what makes the difference between digicam & SLR shots.)

Once a Sony XXX camera can deliver shallow DOF, it will be a
different story, until that time, no comparison.
Quite obviously you don't know much about photography techniques.
There are so many tricks you can employ for a shallower DOF, like
shooting at F2, moving closer to your subject, increasing the
distance of your subject and background, and doing it with
post-processing software. I would rather do these things then buy
super-expensive fast lenses.
 
What is so good about the Sony F828? Let me count the ways .....
1. The Lens. The Carl Zeiss lens is legendary, and second only to
a Leica/Leitz lens. The Zeiss T* proprietary multi-coating is as
close as you will get to the Zeiss T* coated lenses for the Contax
SLR and medium format cameras. Previous F-series models are not T*
coated. The color balance and color fidelity of Zeiss lenses is
incredible.

The zoom coverage and speed of the lens is superior to the F717.
Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage, and the F2.0 - F2.8
speed is incredibly fast, so you can shoot in ISO 100 even when the
light level is very low. The new/improved lens alone is worth the
upgrade from the F717, in my view.

2. The Body. The body is a radical improvement over earlier
models. It is a lot beefier/heftier than the earlier models. The
tough magnesium alloy material is the same material that is being
used in the more expensive pro SLRs. It certainly feels more like
an SLR in your hands than the F717. This is certainly no cheap
plastic camera like most point-and-shoots, and some entry level
SLRs. This tough and rigid body can stand years of heavy use and
abuse. For some, this reason alone would justify buying this
camera.

3. The New Sensor. 8 million pixels. 4-color RGBE CCD. A
marketing gimmick? Ask Nikon. Rumor has it that Nikon is
incorporating this new Sony sensor into their latest Coolpix 8000
model. How Cool is that? Noise? What noise? All the images we
have seen so far are from pre-production samples, and
pre-production tests are as reliable as the polls. Even then, some
of the recent samples look very impressive - clean and noiseless.
Who do you want to believe? Don't believe either. Wait for the
REAL test results. But if Nikon is willing to bank their
reputation on this new sensor, I am sold. I mean, who would you
put your trust in - members of this forum or Sony and Nikon put
together?

4. File Capture. Not happy with just JPEG? Well, you can now get
RAW+JPEG with every shot that you take. You will only find this
feature in the latest D-SLRs. The F828 also feature an astounding
14-bit A/D converter. Theoretically therefore i.e. depending on
your level of skill/expertise, with a RAW file and the new sensor
(and if you use your live histogram correctly) you can now (with
the F828) take your pictures to a HIGHER level than the remarkably
stunning images taken by "T GLOW with the F717:

http://www.usefilm.com/browse.php?offset=0&data=13937&mode=port&thispage=Community

5. Storage. 1GB Memory Stick Pro is not good enough for you?
Stick a 4GB Compact Flash card in ... or have both of them in the
camera. The F828 allows you to do this, so you can keep shooting
in RAW+JPRG mode. Even the top professional cameras cannot offer
you this feature.

6. Live Histogram. This is essential if you want your original
images to be of the highest possible quality. You don't want to
rely on the camera's auto exposure/metering recommendation, the
same way that professional photographers do not always rely on the
in-camera metering system. The histogram enables you to meter the
scene A LOT more accurately. The histogram function is your
built-in hand-held meter for precise metering and total control.

7. Speed of Operation. I understand the F828 will be even faster
than the F717 ... in start-up time (less than 2 sec), capture/write
speed with almost zero shutter lag, fast auto-focussing, and a very
high transfer speed with USB 2.0. By comparison, the 300D
connectivity is USB 1.1.

8. Hot Shoe. The hot shoe is a real hot shoe, so you have all of
the advantages of using a powerful external flash unit with
off-camera flash capability (I think).

9. Auto and Manual Modes. Expose in auto or manual. Focus in
auto or manual. Zoom in manual for more precise framing. Some
entry-level D-SLRs don't even allow you to do this.

10. Movie/video clip, IR photography, live preview, swiveling LCD,
5-point focussing, NightShot, NightFraming, auto-focus illumination
lamp for focussing in total darkness, noise-reduction features,
white balance options, in-camera picture effects and image
parameters, and what-have-you.

Now ... can you name me one other camera (prosumer or D-SLR) that
has all of the above features and still retail at $1,200? The
image quality coming out of this camera is no less than maybe 70%
of a D-SLR with an APS-size or even full-frame sensor ... and it's
looking increasingly likely that it will be closer to 90%. All
this is speculation, of course, but we will know this for a fact
soon enough when we have actual test reports of this dream camera.

Obviously the F828 is not for everyone, and certainly not for most
pros, as it is not a systems camera and it will not allow you to
change lenses. But for those amongst us (non pros) who would
rather travel light and have a digital camera that is as good as
most D-SLRs in terms of image capture quality, this is the camera.
The Minolta A1 comes very close, and it offers image stabilization,
but the F828 is my pick ... because of the Zeiss lens.

Thank you, Sony, for putting out a very fine digital camera at an
affordable price! :)
--
Hewy
F717
member.home.nl/huub.vermeulen
  • ask not what a digicam can do for you, ask yourself what you can
do with a digicam *
--
  • Michiel de Brieder -
If it's in your mind, get the picture and show it! ;-)
http://www.pbase.com/giel
 
You better keep the comparison against DSLRs out of this.

Ignorant and pointless comparisons and remarks is what brings bitter arguments and annoyance.....

I agree with you, F828 is perhaps the best prosumer camera till now and no doubt it will prove to be a very capable picture taking tool.
What is so good about the Sony F828? Let me count the ways .....
1. The Lens. The Carl Zeiss lens is legendary, and second only to
a Leica/Leitz lens. The Zeiss T* proprietary multi-coating is as
close as you will get to the Zeiss T* coated lenses for the Contax
SLR and medium format cameras. Previous F-series models are not T*
coated. The color balance and color fidelity of Zeiss lenses is
incredible.

The zoom coverage and speed of the lens is superior to the F717.
Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage, and the F2.0 - F2.8
speed is incredibly fast, so you can shoot in ISO 100 even when the
light level is very low. The new/improved lens alone is worth the
upgrade from the F717, in my view.

2. The Body. The body is a radical improvement over earlier
models. It is a lot beefier/heftier than the earlier models. The
tough magnesium alloy material is the same material that is being
used in the more expensive pro SLRs. It certainly feels more like
an SLR in your hands than the F717. This is certainly no cheap
plastic camera like most point-and-shoots, and some entry level
SLRs. This tough and rigid body can stand years of heavy use and
abuse. For some, this reason alone would justify buying this
camera.

3. The New Sensor. 8 million pixels. 4-color RGBE CCD. A
marketing gimmick? Ask Nikon. Rumor has it that Nikon is
incorporating this new Sony sensor into their latest Coolpix 8000
model. How Cool is that? Noise? What noise? All the images we
have seen so far are from pre-production samples, and
pre-production tests are as reliable as the polls. Even then, some
of the recent samples look very impressive - clean and noiseless.
Who do you want to believe? Don't believe either. Wait for the
REAL test results. But if Nikon is willing to bank their
reputation on this new sensor, I am sold. I mean, who would you
put your trust in - members of this forum or Sony and Nikon put
together?

4. File Capture. Not happy with just JPEG? Well, you can now get
RAW+JPEG with every shot that you take. You will only find this
feature in the latest D-SLRs. The F828 also feature an astounding
14-bit A/D converter. Theoretically therefore i.e. depending on
your level of skill/expertise, with a RAW file and the new sensor
(and if you use your live histogram correctly) you can now (with
the F828) take your pictures to a HIGHER level than the remarkably
stunning images taken by "T GLOW with the F717:

http://www.usefilm.com/browse.php?offset=0&data=13937&mode=port&thispage=Community

5. Storage. 1GB Memory Stick Pro is not good enough for you?
Stick a 4GB Compact Flash card in ... or have both of them in the
camera. The F828 allows you to do this, so you can keep shooting
in RAW+JPRG mode. Even the top professional cameras cannot offer
you this feature.

6. Live Histogram. This is essential if you want your original
images to be of the highest possible quality. You don't want to
rely on the camera's auto exposure/metering recommendation, the
same way that professional photographers do not always rely on the
in-camera metering system. The histogram enables you to meter the
scene A LOT more accurately. The histogram function is your
built-in hand-held meter for precise metering and total control.

7. Speed of Operation. I understand the F828 will be even faster
than the F717 ... in start-up time (less than 2 sec), capture/write
speed with almost zero shutter lag, fast auto-focussing, and a very
high transfer speed with USB 2.0. By comparison, the 300D
connectivity is USB 1.1.

8. Hot Shoe. The hot shoe is a real hot shoe, so you have all of
the advantages of using a powerful external flash unit with
off-camera flash capability (I think).

9. Auto and Manual Modes. Expose in auto or manual. Focus in
auto or manual. Zoom in manual for more precise framing. Some
entry-level D-SLRs don't even allow you to do this.

10. Movie/video clip, IR photography, live preview, swiveling LCD,
5-point focussing, NightShot, NightFraming, auto-focus illumination
lamp for focussing in total darkness, noise-reduction features,
white balance options, in-camera picture effects and image
parameters, and what-have-you.

Now ... can you name me one other camera (prosumer or D-SLR) that
has all of the above features and still retail at $1,200? The
image quality coming out of this camera is no less than maybe 70%
of a D-SLR with an APS-size or even full-frame sensor ... and it's
looking increasingly likely that it will be closer to 90%. All
this is speculation, of course, but we will know this for a fact
soon enough when we have actual test reports of this dream camera.

Obviously the F828 is not for everyone, and certainly not for most
pros, as it is not a systems camera and it will not allow you to
change lenses. But for those amongst us (non pros) who would
rather travel light and have a digital camera that is as good as
most D-SLRs in terms of image capture quality, this is the camera.
The Minolta A1 comes very close, and it offers image stabilization,
but the F828 is my pick ... because of the Zeiss lens.

Thank you, Sony, for putting out a very fine digital camera at an
affordable price! :)
 
You better keep the comparison against DSLRs out of this.
Ignorant and pointless comparisons and remarks is what brings
bitter arguments and annoyance.....

I agree with you, F828 is perhaps the best prosumer camera till now
and no doubt it will prove to be a very capable picture taking tool.
I cannot take the D-SLR comparison out but I did try to avoid brand-name comparisons. For most of us, we want a prosumer camera with D-SLR features ... hence the constant reference to D-SLR. D-SLR is the ultimate and the standard by which prosumer cameras are judged.
 
Shallow DOF capability with beautiful bokeh ?
For the type of photography I do, shallow DOF is more of a curse than a blessing.
(IMO this is what makes the difference between digicam & SLR shots.)
It makes a difference, not the difference. Also, a dSLR is a digicam as well.
Once a Sony XXX camera can deliver shallow DOF, it will be a
different story, until that time, no comparison.
If you limit your comparison between different camera models/architectures to their DOF performance, then you'll find yourself in a minority. :)
What about low noise ? Neat-image is not a solution but a sad
workaround for shortcomings of your device.
As is diving nose down into the sand to achieve a targeted low angle or overhead shot for which the F-series has its swiveling body. All cameras have their pros and cons.
Bleeding or purple fringing ? I don't want it, do you ?
Nope. But I can't say that I see an excessive amount of it other than in the most extremes of lighting situations.
You can make yourself believe it looks good....but IMO you are just
fooling yourself.
Let's chalk up the current sales of the F-series to mass hysteria then. Hmmm... doesn't sound plausible, now does it? :)
Ofcourse, people will say : I have printed the images and I don't
see the purple fringing.....well let me wake you up, it is there,
but your printer is not good enough to print the details.
Most people don't print their own images, but take them to a professional photo lab instead. Do all of those have substandard equipment as well?
It does not make the image better, as it is there, and we all can see
it on screen, same applies for the bleeding colors.
I thought we had switched to prints? On screen, you can easily downsample an 8MP image with beautiful results. Not as good as a dSLR in many cases no doubt, but there's the pros and cons argument for you again.
The complaint about DSLRs and their soft shots....what about the
828 ?? Sharpness ? it is hard to find.
Let's wait until we see the final production samples. Until then, this is guesswork. My F717 images are tack sharp.
Another complaint about dslr's : those things are huge....
Now the 828 is (almost) here, it is not exactly small now is it ?
No-one is complaining anylonger about the size....
That complaint was predominantly based on the necessity to carry around extra lenses with a dSLR to mimick the flexibility of the F828 lens. This argument still holds true.
the USB connection is a non-issue and for me they shouldn't have to
put it in in the first place.
Why not?
If I want to make movies....I will buy a videocamera.
And lug around two pieces of equipment, including accessories times two? I already hear people complaining about size again.
Have fun with your future 828....!
And you with your dSLR!

Roy.
 
I was just looking at some 1Ds samples with the acclaimed 28-70L
$1300 lens and comparing to the 828 samples I have.

Both cameras showed a similar degree of purple fringing at the
corners.
The 28-70L would indeed produce purple fringing effects at very wide apertures. You can see these in Phil's D60 review sample shots, so this is old news. It's also an old lens: The 28-70L has been discontinued for a long time now, so it would be better to compare with the newer 24-70L.

However, the essence of your point is valid: Digital SLRs are not immune to purple fringe.

For comparisons, it's very important to take shots under identical situations. I've taken shots in situations that would seem ripe for purple fringe and seen none. I've also been surprised by the appearance of purple fringe in some shots where I did not expect it. Looking at two different shots from two different cameras taken under different conditions is not a reasonable way to assess purple fringe beyond establishing the fact that it can indeed occur.

--
Ron Parr
FAQ: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/parr/
 
I'm not pointing these things out to bash you or the camera. I just want to keep the hyperbole under control:
What is so good about the Sony F828? Let me count the ways .....
1. The Lens. The Carl Zeiss lens is legendary, and second only to
a Leica/Leitz lens. The Zeiss T* proprietary multi-coating is as
close as you will get to the Zeiss T* coated lenses for the Contax
SLR and medium format cameras. Previous F-series models are not T*
coated. The color balance and color fidelity of Zeiss lenses is
incredible.
This is possible. Until we see tests, this is just marketing hype and speculation.
3. The New Sensor. 8 million pixels. 4-color RGBE CCD. A
marketing gimmick? Ask Nikon. Rumor has it that Nikon is
incorporating this new Sony sensor into their latest Coolpix 8000
model. How Cool is that? Noise? What noise? All the images we
have seen so far are from pre-production samples, and
pre-production tests are as reliable as the polls. Even then, some
of the recent samples look very impressive - clean and noiseless.
They aren't bad, but they're far from clean and noiseless.
Who do you want to believe? Don't believe either. Wait for the
REAL test results. But if Nikon is willing to bank their
reputation on this new sensor, I am sold. I mean, who would you
put your trust in - members of this forum or Sony and Nikon put
together?
Nikon has always used Sony sensors. It would be a shocking vote of non-confidence if they stopped.
9. Auto and Manual Modes. Expose in auto or manual. Focus in
auto or manual. Zoom in manual for more precise framing. Some
entry-level D-SLRs don't even allow you to do this.
It's not entirely clear what you're saying here, but there are no restrictions on zooming and focusing with the 300D, if that's what you meant to imply.
Now ... can you name me one other camera (prosumer or D-SLR) that
has all of the above features and still retail at $1,200? The
image quality coming out of this camera is no less than maybe 70%
of a D-SLR with an APS-size or even full-frame sensor ... and it's
looking increasingly likely that it will be closer to 90%. All
this is speculation, of course, but we will know this for a fact
soon enough when we have actual test reports of this dream camera.
It's not clear what your percentages mean or how you are calculating them. The 828 will likely have higher total resolution than a 6MP DSLR, but it will also probably have a lot more noise.

--
Ron Parr
FAQ: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/parr/
 
" Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage"

I, also am considering the f828 but I'm not so impressed with the 7x optical zoom.

The 717 has a 38mm-190mm range based on dpreview.com specs
The 828 has a 28mm-200mm range.

Even though its 7x vs 5x is it really a BIG improvement over the 717?

Sure based on the wide angle position it's 7x but in reality it gets you, pretty much, as close to the action as the 717. The only real advantage I see is a little better wide angle.

The other major advance is 8mp vs 5mp. If you don't go beyond 8x10 there shouldn't be much of a difference. Although 8mp does give you more croppng range without significant loss.

I don't see these point brought up. Am I missing something here?
 
This is possible. Until we see tests, this is just marketing hype
and speculation.
If the Zeiss lenses for Sony are coming out from the same plant that does the Zeiss lenses for their 35mm and medium format Contaxes, there is no reason to think that it would be a dog. There is also a good reason why the earlier F-series lenses are not T* coated, as they were probably less expensive with less coating. It is therefore logical to assume that the T* coated lens will be better than the non T* coated lenses of earlier models.
They aren't bad, but they're far from clean and noiseless.
For that matter, all digital images are not completely noiseless.
Nikon has always used Sony sensors. It would be a shocking vote of
non-confidence if they stopped.
Quite. My point was that if they don't think cramming 8 million pixels in a tiny sensor is a good thing, they would stick to 5 million pixels.
It's not entirely clear what you're saying here, but there are no
restrictions on zooming and focusing with the 300D, if that's what
you meant to imply.
I was actually referring to the manual exposure. I believe the 300D has no manual focus or manual override for exposure - it's strictly auto.
It's not clear what your percentages mean or how you are
calculating them. The 828 will likely have higher total resolution
than a 6MP DSLR, but it will also probably have a lot more noise.
I didn't make myself clear. I merely meant that the images we have seen so far may not be as good as the D-SLRs, but I am confident that actual tests with production cameras will show that the gap is actually much narrower than we think.
 
" Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage"

I, also am considering the f828 but I'm not so impressed with the
7x optical zoom.

The 717 has a 38mm-190mm range based on dpreview.com specs
The 828 has a 28mm-200mm range.

Even though its 7x vs 5x is it really a BIG improvement over the 717?
Sure based on the wide angle position it's 7x but in reality it
gets you, pretty much, as close to the action as the 717. The only
real advantage I see is a little better wide angle.
Well, the new lens is T* coated and the earlier models are not. The T* Zeiss coating IS a big deal, but how much better is it? Doesn't really matter as long as it is better.
The other major advance is 8mp vs 5mp. If you don't go beyond 8x10
there shouldn't be much of a difference. Although 8mp does give
you more croppng range without significant loss.
Agreed. The higher resolution not so significant if you do not enlarge a picture by more than 8 x 10". For those with wide-format printers, the difference will be noticeable.
 
The problem I'm having is that if Sony wanted to make a big leap up they should have improved the zoom. At least on my 717 I can add a tele-converter to get up to 323mm w/ TCON-17(~$100) and 380mm w/ Sony 2x lens (~$175).

The 828 does not have the ability to add on lens or filters.

I was really excited about the new Sony until analyzing these points.

My 717 takes GREAT pictures. Everyone that has seen pics taken with the camera love the results. As an amatuer, I and the people that look at my pics, are not going to notice a difference between T coated or the new sensor. I'm sure if you put pics from both camera next to each other and scrutinize the results we'll see a difference. Everyone is caught up in little details. Sure, you can improve on GREAT pictures but at some point it becomes irrelevant, IMHO.

At this point, I would suggest to anyone interested in the Sony, to get the F717 + Tele-converter Lens + External Flash. All of that should run, conservatively, around $800. I would guarantee that you would be one satisfied customer.

Having said this, I'm sure not one will be disappointed with the 828 but I just don't think it's worth the money right now.

I'm very interested in what Sony will offer in their next years model.
" Not many zoom lenses have a 28-200mm coverage"

I, also am considering the f828 but I'm not so impressed with the
7x optical zoom.

The 717 has a 38mm-190mm range based on dpreview.com specs
The 828 has a 28mm-200mm range.

Even though its 7x vs 5x is it really a BIG improvement over the 717?
Sure based on the wide angle position it's 7x but in reality it
gets you, pretty much, as close to the action as the 717. The only
real advantage I see is a little better wide angle.
Well, the new lens is T* coated and the earlier models are not.
The T* Zeiss coating IS a big deal, but how much better is it?
Doesn't really matter as long as it is better.
The other major advance is 8mp vs 5mp. If you don't go beyond 8x10
there shouldn't be much of a difference. Although 8mp does give
you more croppng range without significant loss.
Agreed. The higher resolution not so significant if you do not
enlarge a picture by more than 8 x 10". For those with wide-format
printers, the difference will be noticeable.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top