Latest E-M1X tidbits (MAJOR, if true):

I've kept all my 4/3rds SHGs and skipped the MK2, I wan't to hear more about the focus compaibility with them. This camera will meet all my needs If this puppy will work flawlessly with them, and I'm in for sure. I might add I always liked the extra size with grips.Used my E cams with the grips and flash brackets .
 
Last edited:
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
 
More details have been leaked.

https://photorumors.com/2019/01/18/...-flash-system-pictures-specifications-prices/

The Olympus E-M1X is toughest, fastest and smartest OM-D yet, featuring the world's best image stabilization and stand out new capabilities including 50mp Hi-Res Shot handheld. The new built-in vertical grip houses two batteries for extended use and a deep finger rest for both horizontal and vertical positions gives a more comfortable grip. New twin processors take high-speed performance to another level for both image processing and a re-developed intelligent autofocus system. The magnesium alloy body is fully IPX1 weather resistance tested.
  • Weight 997g
  • Body (WxHxD) 144.4 x 146.8 x 75.4mm
  • Effective Resolution 20.4 megapixels
  • Continuous Shooting Speed 18 fps
E-M1.2 has that.
The weight is approximately 100 grams more than the E-M1.2 with grip or about 120 grams more than the Nikon D500 camera body.
  • 50 MP Handheld High Res shot functionality. Building on the HiRes innovation on the E-M1 MK II where a tripod was required, the E-M1X can now take a 50mp HiRes shot handheld. Using a tripod it can now produce 80mp images.
  • World's best Image stabilization: In combination with a M.Zuiko IS PRO lens, this technology enables the 5-axis sync IS to compensate for approx. 7.5 shutter speed steps.
  • Totally new AF system with various AF target modes and settings and intelligent subject tracking.
Remains to be seen.
  • With locked AF, the E-M1X features high-speed sequential shooting at a maximum of 60 fps to capture split-second moments that the human eye cannot see. With AF/AE tracking, a maximum of 18 fps may be reached.
  • Key OM-D Movie video capabilities: 4K and C4K, OM-Log400, Different levels of IS, 120 fps high-speed shooting in Full HD
  • Anti-flicker shooting capabilities
E-M1.2 has that.
  • Integrated field sensors to add detailed metadata to pictures and video
  • Live ND feature for slow shutter effects without an external filter.
  • Dust, splash, & freezeproof. Weatherproofing maintained even when connecting microphone, earphone or remote control cable
  • Integrated field sensors to add detailed metadata to pictures and video
  • Two UHS-II SD card slots for high-speed responsiveness
That should have been done on E-M1.2.
  • Two batteries in innovative cartridge system and USB charging capabilities
  • The sensor dust reduction system now features an improved Super Sonic Wave Filter (SSWF) with a special coating which vibrates 30,000 times per second further reducing the possibility of dust or dirt ruining photos and equipment by factor 10
  • Capture up to 2,580 images before having to recharge. Featuring USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) from up to 100 W power sources, both batteries in the camera body can be fully charged in approximately two hours
I've gotten 4500 images on one battery with 20% left over on E-M1.2.
If the 2580 is CIPA number, then it is a lot better than E-M1.2. If just a number based on one of the beta testers, then not particularly useful.
  • A new Wi-Fi capture allows tethered shooting without a cable and makes it possible to transfer images wirelessly to a computer with the Olympus
  • Prices:> * Olympus E-M1X body ¥365,040 / £2,799> * Olympus FL-700WR: ¥38,880
    • Olympus Flash Commander FC-WR: ¥34,560
    • Olympus Flash Receiver FR-WR: ¥23,760
Read more: https://photorumors.com/2019/01/18/...pictures-specifications-prices/#ixzz5cywF8ffA
 
Is there anything this camera doesn't have, besides a low price. :-D
I was hoping for a built-in coffee machine.

I would be fine if it just accepted a single capsule and only made espresso. That would be a huge step up from any other camera. Gotta start somewhere, you know.
 
Is there anything this camera doesn't have, besides a low price. :-D
I was hoping for a built-in coffee machine.

I would be fine if it just accepted a single capsule and only made espresso. That would be a huge step up from any other camera. Gotta start somewhere, you know.
While the superb stabilization reduces any spill, I still find those crop cups to hold too little beverage for my taste.

--
Best regards
/Anders
----------------------------------------------------
42 Megapixels is the answer to life, the universe and everything.
You don't have to like my pictures, but it would help: http://www.lattermann.com/gallery
 
Is there anything this camera doesn't have, besides a low price. :-D
I was hoping for a built-in coffee machine.

I would be fine if it just accepted a single capsule and only made espresso. That would be a huge step up from any other camera. Gotta start somewhere, you know.
While the superb stabilization reduces any spill, I still find those crop cups to hold too little beverage for my taste.
Oh yeah, for sure Sony would come up with a model that made lungo, which is of course superior to espresso, being much more full than it. But Olympus could make their espresso equivalent to lungo by making it twice as hot, so maybe they would be able to fix it with a firmware update.
 
Is there anything this camera doesn't have, besides a low price. :-D
I was hoping for a built-in coffee machine.

I would be fine if it just accepted a single capsule and only made espresso. That would be a huge step up from any other camera. Gotta start somewhere, you know.
While the superb stabilization reduces any spill, I still find those crop cups to hold too little beverage for my taste.
Oh yeah, for sure Sony would come up with a model that made lungo, which is of course superior to espresso, being much more full than it. But Olympus could make their espresso equivalent to lungo by making it twice as hot, so maybe they would be able to fix it with a firmware update.
Meanwhile Fujifilm cameras only make tea.
 
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
 
Is there anything this camera doesn't have, besides a low price. :-D
I was hoping for a built-in coffee machine.

I would be fine if it just accepted a single capsule and only made espresso. That would be a huge step up from any other camera. Gotta start somewhere, you know.
While the superb stabilization reduces any spill, I still find those crop cups to hold too little beverage for my taste.
Oh yeah, for sure Sony would come up with a model that made lungo, which is of course superior to espresso, being much more full than it. But Olympus could make their espresso equivalent to lungo by making it twice as hot, so maybe they would be able to fix it with a firmware update.
Meanwhile Fujifilm cameras only make tea.
But it wold be organic, fair trade tea. And real tea leaves, not the garbage powdered "tea" bags you buy in a market around the corner.

It would also require you to set the brewing time and temperature with two separate physical dials.

It would also spill the tea, burn your hands or fail to pour water, all of which would be fixed by a series of firmware updates within the year of release. Some of those updates would introduce new bugs, like giving you an electric shock if you look at another camera.
 
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
 
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
It would seem the E-M1ii has a custom sensor and is a low-volume camera compared to the rest of the line, so this is perhaps lowerish yet.

And will it take a teardown to see what's actually in there? Oly has been coy in the past.

Cheers,

Rick
 
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
The 1/60s sensor readout doesn't seem to mesh with the hi-res capabilities. Maybe it can output at a fast speed for only a short burst (8 shots) and Olympus has only enabled this for the hi-res mode. If a faster sensor read-out is not possible for regular shooting, then I'll just stick with my E-M1ii and the coming firmware update.

--
My Flickr Birds
 
Last edited:
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
The 1/60s sensor readout doesn't seem to mesh with the hi-res capabilities. Maybe it can output at a fast speed for only a short burst (8 shots) and Olympus has only enabled this for the hi-res mode. If a faster sensor read-out is not possible for regular shooting, then I'll just stick with my E-M1ii and the coming firmware update.
While it may be possible to temporarily speed up the frame rate of a sensor, I am not sure how one would temporarily speed up the readout of a sensor, but then I don't know that much about sensors. Maybe there is a way you can read 8 rows at once, but then if that is possible, why haven't others implemented it.
 
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
The 1/60s sensor readout doesn't seem to mesh with the hi-res capabilities. Maybe it can output at a fast speed for only a short burst (8 shots) and Olympus has only enabled this for the hi-res mode. If a faster sensor read-out is not possible for regular shooting, then I'll just stick with my E-M1ii and the coming firmware update.
Same here times two.
 
Very little on the actual sensor - dynamic range etc. But that’s a big jump now in the info available if true.
Wouldn't it be the same sensor? I'm not sure Olympus could afford a custom sensor for a low volume camera.

But if they do, in fact, do that, than the high price is well justified. Such sensors are probably more expensive than the common 24mp FF sensors that are in bunch of cameras sold nowadays.

My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). Just with more bandwidth and processing power to squeeze the most out of it.
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. Of course these are only rumors at this point.
It's probably only 4 shots for handheld mode. The rumors I think say 1/125 is the slowest possible shutter and it takes 1/15 to take the whole sequence. That about matches the 1/60 readout speed of the current sensor.
 
My bet is on the exact same sensor as in E-M1 Mark II (which already does 60fps full sensor readout). [...]
I am not sure how one could get 8 pixel shifts hand held at 1/60 out of a sensor that has a readout speed of 1/60. [...]
It's probably only 4 shots for handheld mode. The rumors I think say 1/125 is the slowest possible shutter and it takes 1/15 to take the whole sequence. That about matches the 1/60 readout speed of the current sensor.
Interestingly, I was predicting 4 shot version of high res mode nearly 2 years ago (and frankly, I was wondering why it was not there at the very beginning as a "full colour capture" mode, without high res tricks), like here and here . Since all my predictions regarding E-M5 Mark III were complete failures, maybe at least this one will come true :-)
 
This (no EVF blackouts) would require a layered sensor. That would be magical.
Not really, the G9 does it without a stacked sensor. It's just not as flexible as the A9 and only works in the high speed drive modes.
Yes, there are several ways to avoid visible blackouts, including 'cheats' like freezing the previous frame. But also things like having the blackout duration less than the eye can perceive like 1/25s.
Eye can see that. The eye can detect very easily flickering and especially having a black frame between image frames. That is reason why 100Hz televisions were made, where the normal 50Hz feed was super sampled so each frame was shown twice, eliminating black frame between 50Hz frames. That black between frames was causing for some a headache, triggering epilepsia and was tiring for eyes.

Human eye can see durations faster than 1/100000 second, detect even shapes like silhouettes and recognize them. Reason is that bright flash will "burn" for longer period than it is received.
 
I've kept all my 4/3rds SHGs and skipped the MK2, I wan't to hear more about the focus compaibility with them. This camera will meet all my needs If this puppy will work flawlessly with them, and I'm in for sure. I might add I always liked the extra size with grips.Used my E cams with the grips and flash brackets .
I kept my E-5 and skipped the Mk 1. The Mk 2 is OK but I was hoping for better.

I don’t hold much hope that the X will do PDAF with 4/3 lenses any better than the Mk 2. If it does then it probably won’t be because Olympus made a deliberate effort In support of the legacy lenses.

There is also a possibility that by optimising C-AF performance for their latest MFT lenses the X will be worse with 4/3 lenses than the Mk 2

Peter
 
Last edited:
I sure hope not , but we've been let down before, haven't we :-(
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top