(In this thread I am talking about Nikon bodies and lenses so I am using a crop factor of x1.5 in my examples. For Canon shooters a crop factor of x1.6 should be used. Just mentioning.)
Hello everyone. After 6 years in photography I am still fighting that monster we call crop factor. The reason why I got confused again is because of a youtube chanel called “Tony & Chelsea Northrup”. Watched a few videos about fx on dx and dx on fx and about multiplying the f and the iso and the noise and then found another channel saying that he is wrong etc and I almost smashed my computer.
Well for start let’s forget everything else and concentrate on one thing. Focal Length.
(Please ignore the fact that I am giving a prime DX as an example that does not exist. Let’s keep it for the example)
50mm FX lense on FX body = 50mm
50mm FX lense on DX body = 75mm
50mm DX lense on FX body = 75mm (crop mode)
50mm DX lense on DX body = 75mm (crop mode automatically since it’s a cut sensor)
Q1. Do we agree on the above?
Q2. Do you believe that when multiplying the mm on a lense the F also does get multiplied?
Real example for Question 2:
I used to shoot nightlife in clubs. Had a D5100 with a 18-55. After 3 years I got tired and stopped. Now they are asking me back in the nightlife but now I have a D610 with just a 50mm lense.
So my thoughts are. Just buy a 17-55 f2.8 and I will be 1mm wider than I used to be (big deal lol), have a big loss on MP (it’s going to use the center of the sensor so about 10mp) but I don’t mind since it’s only for facebook.
Will I lose that f2.8 so multiply it by x1.5 as the guy in the video said? He confused me!
Hello everyone. After 6 years in photography I am still fighting that monster we call crop factor. The reason why I got confused again is because of a youtube chanel called “Tony & Chelsea Northrup”. Watched a few videos about fx on dx and dx on fx and about multiplying the f and the iso and the noise and then found another channel saying that he is wrong etc and I almost smashed my computer.
Well for start let’s forget everything else and concentrate on one thing. Focal Length.
(Please ignore the fact that I am giving a prime DX as an example that does not exist. Let’s keep it for the example)
50mm FX lense on FX body = 50mm
50mm FX lense on DX body = 75mm
50mm DX lense on FX body = 75mm (crop mode)
50mm DX lense on DX body = 75mm (crop mode automatically since it’s a cut sensor)
Q1. Do we agree on the above?
Q2. Do you believe that when multiplying the mm on a lense the F also does get multiplied?
Real example for Question 2:
I used to shoot nightlife in clubs. Had a D5100 with a 18-55. After 3 years I got tired and stopped. Now they are asking me back in the nightlife but now I have a D610 with just a 50mm lense.
So my thoughts are. Just buy a 17-55 f2.8 and I will be 1mm wider than I used to be (big deal lol), have a big loss on MP (it’s going to use the center of the sensor so about 10mp) but I don’t mind since it’s only for facebook.
Will I lose that f2.8 so multiply it by x1.5 as the guy in the video said? He confused me!
Last edited: