Has anyone used the Voigtlander 65mm APO Lanthar

nonuniform

Leading Member
Messages
551
Solutions
1
Reaction score
88
Location
US
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
 
Only A7RII but it’ll just be easier to focus on the RIII thanks to the better EVF. Very sharp, nice but neutral rendering. Larger than you might think, compliments of the macro helicoid. Focus is a bit touchy at longer distances, but I’d think at portrait distance it wouldnt be too bad. Nice lens if you can work with it’s size.
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
 
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
The 65APO will force you to do more PP on female portraits, unless they want every wrinkle and line visible in great detail, other than that, it's one of the best lenses in E mount.

--
A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/
[My Lens list](http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/viewprofile.php?Action=viewprofile&username=LightShow)
####Where's my FF NEX-7 ?????
Firmware request:
-A button map for toggling the EVF & LCD
-Still waiting for the minimum shutter speed with auto ISO for my NEX-7 and A7r. I know it will never happen.
-Customize the display screen layout, I'd love to have both Histogram and level at the same time.
-More peaking options, being able to set peaking sensitivity and a threshold level.
-An RGB overlay on the histogram -An option to return the focus assist zoom to one button press
-An option to return to how the NEX-7 handled playback, ie. center button to zoom, then you could use the control dial to zoom in and out, then center button to exit the zoom mode.
 
Last edited:
Definitely is sharp as all get out and may require you to soften it up a bit.

It's MF provided you're OK with that, so you won't get the Eye AF.

There are some scenarios where the bokeh is a bit harsh, so you'll have to get to know that assuming you're going to be shooting wide open or close to wide open.

Overall it's a great lens combo with the riii though. (although I'd look elsewhere for portraits)
 
I agree with all the points above, there is some great advice here - I would add that it is one of my favourite lens I have ever used, and has incredible 'pop' for want of a better word.

Sharpness and lack of CA is phenomenal, but I also agree that it works best at portrait distances and can be a bit twitchy / hit and miss at longer distances (not hugely but sometimes noticeable). Also seems for me to nail focus much better at F2 than any other aperture. I never, ever change it from F2, it just works so well at that aperture. This and the 100mm STF are two of my favourite lenses of all time!
 
I shoot mostly portraits with fast lenses. The 65 APO is absolutely the sharpest lens made for FE mount. If I shoot the GM 85mm f1.4 with Eye Focus on AF-C wide-open, nearly every shot will be in perfect focus, I tried the manual focus 65 APO and a whole lot of shots were not in perfect focus; plus, I missed a lot of shot opportunities. For me, Eye Focus has changed the whole game.
 
I shoot mostly portraits with fast lenses. The 65 APO is absolutely the sharpest lens made for FE mount. If I shoot the GM 85mm f1.4 with Eye Focus on AF-C wide-open, nearly every shot will be in perfect focus, I tried the manual focus 65 APO and a whole lot of shots were not in perfect focus; plus, I missed a lot of shot opportunities. For me, Eye Focus has changed the whole game.
This is the conclusion I came to as well. I love manual focus and just recently bought the Loxia 25 and 85 but I did so because they are my most used landscape focal lengths and those two lenses are, I think, best in class. I will almost never use them for taking photos of people or family. I bought the 100STF for that and will continue to flesh out my lens lineup with AF lenses purely because, after all these years, I have realized that my romantic vision of using MF glass doesn't translate as well as I think it does. I have some fantastic shots, don't get me wrong, but usually by forcing people to stand still while I focus. I do far better with candid shots with AF and Sony's eye AF is like voodoo. It's for that exact reason I say 'screw it' and just sold off most of my remaining Nikon gear. It will only get better as well.
 
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
I just picked up the 65 last week. I use it with my RIII and my A6500.

Focus peaking works very well with both cameras, but better with the RIII, of course, with its 4k-like EVF.

Sharpness is a very important feature I assess for when buying a lens. I believe the 65 may be the sharpest and most clear lens I have ever used--particularly, when stopped down to f/2.8. The research I have done on the lens suggests it is nearly optically perfect. When you see the clarity it renders resulting from a lack of CA, your impression of it is likely to align with what the research suggests.

As for bokeh, it looks good to me. Color and contrast are good, too.

Focusing is a breeze with Sony series, but particularly so with the RIII and its evf. When you turn the focus ring a bit, the camera automatically magnifies wherever one has placed the focus point. Practicing on my girlfriend, I was able to acquire focus on the eye pretty quickly. I suppose after one learns the lens, doing portraits of still subjects will be a breeze, especially if one is stopped down.
 
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
Very very sharp lens, but portrait, I will say the 85GM is a much better lens, for me at least, the 85GM offers much better Bokeh, and you can utilize the EYE focus, alsoI am a huge fan of 85-105 not so much of 50-65 range. I will even take the 85 1.8 over this Voigtlander 65 for portrait.
 
I'm in the middle of field testing it now. It is incredibly sharp. As expected, the build quality is unrivaled - one ginormous chunk of metal and glass - and for photographers, it must be compared to savoring a fine wine or something. But for us poor videographers, it's just like any other manual lens when it comes to actually shooting with it, since unlike most of you, we can't really handle the lens when we shoot. The camera's in a cage with rails and follow focus and I can barely even make out the camera.

--
http://jonpais.wordpress.com
 
Last edited:
One of the best reviewers out there has a several video series on it and a detailed text review.

https://dustinabbott.net/2018/08/voigtlander-macro-apo-lanthar-65mm-f-2-review/

His conclusion

"

As you can probably tell, I’m pretty delighted with this lens. It combines a lot of things that I love in one compact, beautifully crafted package. I love the flexibility of being able to get close to subjects and play with the macro range while enjoying the flexibility of the larger maximum aperture at other focus distances. I love the exceptional color rendition, resolution, and microcontrast from the lens. And I love the fact that while the Voigtländer Macro Apo-Lanthar 65mm f/2 isn’t cheap at $999 USD, it is a bargain for what it brings to the table and how it compares to more expensive options. Yes, it is manual focus only. No, it doesn’t have weather sealing. If it had those two things, it would be pretty much the perfect lens. As a manual focus lens, it will be passed over by the masses, but if you aren’t put off by manual focus and take a chance on this lens, it will probably become one of your favorites for a long time to come.

Pros:"
 
Last edited:
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
The 65APO will force you to do more PP on female portraits, unless they want every wrinkle and line visible in great detail, other than that, it's one of the best lenses in E mount.
I shoot a lot of 4x5 and 8x10 portraits as well, so, I'm used to detail. Just tired of drum scanning.
 
I shoot mostly portraits with fast lenses. The 65 APO is absolutely the sharpest lens made for FE mount. If I shoot the GM 85mm f1.4 with Eye Focus on AF-C wide-open, nearly every shot will be in perfect focus, I tried the manual focus 65 APO and a whole lot of shots were not in perfect focus; plus, I missed a lot of shot opportunities. For me, Eye Focus has changed the whole game.
Yes, I use eye focus as well, however, I also do a lot of work in large format, so, I have a practice for a style of portraiture that really doesn't require AF, let alone eye af.

Appreciate the feedback.
 
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
Very very sharp lens, but portrait, I will say the 85GM is a much better lens, for me at least, the 85GM offers much better Bokeh, and you can utilize the EYE focus, alsoI am a huge fan of 85-105 not so much of 50-65 range. I will even take the 85 1.8 over this Voigtlander 65 for portrait.
Yeah, I hear you. The 85GM is a very nice lens, I've used it, and have no complaints.

The thing is, I don't see the world at that focal length. I wish I could explain, but, my best portraits are around 55-65mm, or 180mm on 4x5. I think because I need to be close to my subject to have a dialog, and the 85mm just puts me too far away.

Anyhow, I appreciate the feedback!
 
I like this length for portraits. I have the 55/1.8 and have tested the 85/1.4 GM and both are very good lenses, but for me, 65mm is an ideal length with what I'm trying to do.

Just curious if anyone has used it with the A7RIII and has any thoughts.

Thanks!
I just picked up the 65 last week. I use it with my RIII and my A6500.

Focus peaking works very well with both cameras, but better with the RIII, of course, with its 4k-like EVF.

Sharpness is a very important feature I assess for when buying a lens. I believe the 65 may be the sharpest and most clear lens I have ever used--particularly, when stopped down to f/2.8. The research I have done on the lens suggests it is nearly optically perfect. When you see the clarity it renders resulting from a lack of CA, your impression of it is likely to align with what the research suggests.

As for bokeh, it looks good to me. Color and contrast are good, too.

Focusing is a breeze with Sony series, but particularly so with the RIII and its evf. When you turn the focus ring a bit, the camera automatically magnifies wherever one has placed the focus point. Practicing on my girlfriend, I was able to acquire focus on the eye pretty quickly. I suppose after one learns the lens, doing portraits of still subjects will be a breeze, especially if one is stopped down.
Thanks! Useful info.

I'm totally fine with MF on the A7 series, I started out with the original A7R and my Leica lenses. over time, I've added a collection of AF lenses as well, but I love the 65mm fov.
 
I shoot mostly portraits with fast lenses. The 65 APO is absolutely the sharpest lens made for FE mount. If I shoot the GM 85mm f1.4 with Eye Focus on AF-C wide-open, nearly every shot will be in perfect focus, I tried the manual focus 65 APO and a whole lot of shots were not in perfect focus; plus, I missed a lot of shot opportunities. For me, Eye Focus has changed the whole game.
This is the conclusion I came to as well. I love manual focus and just recently bought the Loxia 25 and 85 but I did so because they are my most used landscape focal lengths and those two lenses are, I think, best in class. I will almost never use them for taking photos of people or family. I bought the 100STF for that and will continue to flesh out my lens lineup with AF lenses purely because, after all these years, I have realized that my romantic vision of using MF glass doesn't translate as well as I think it does. I have some fantastic shots, don't get me wrong, but usually by forcing people to stand still while I focus. I do far better with candid shots with AF and Sony's eye AF is like voodoo. It's for that exact reason I say 'screw it' and just sold off most of my remaining Nikon gear. It will only get better as well.
Yeah, it depends on the shot. I have AF lenses when I need them.

I specifically want this focal length, since I'm going to test using the A7RIII instead of my 4x5 and 180mm lens. I'm already shooting people where they have to stop moving, so, it's just less gear to carry around!
 
Well, I rented the lens.

I love it. It's really great if you like a longer lens than 50, but not as long as 85, and can deal with MF. Lot of ifs, but, damn, totally worth it.

Also, much happier with MF on the A7RIII than I was on the original A7R. Now I'm bummed out I sold my Summicrons. :(

Anyhow, I haven't really spent enough time with the lens to say for sure, but as far as I can tell, objects at infinity are sharp enough for me. Objects at a standard medium shot (waist up portrait) totally sharp. Also happy with the color.

Anyhow. I'm thrilled, and I'm totally enjoying the MF.
 
Well, I rented the lens.

I love it. It's really great if you like a longer lens than 50, but not as long as 85, and can deal with MF. Lot of ifs, but, damn, totally worth it.

Also, much happier with MF on the A7RIII than I was on the original A7R. Now I'm bummed out I sold my Summicrons. :(

Anyhow, I haven't really spent enough time with the lens to say for sure, but as far as I can tell, objects at infinity are sharp enough for me. Objects at a standard medium shot (waist up portrait) totally sharp. Also happy with the color.

Anyhow. I'm thrilled, and I'm totally enjoying the MF.
Yeah, focus peaking on RIII is great.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top