From Nikon Z6 to A7R III

From reviews the Sony video af is no better than nikon, I think a reality of video is that af (which is usually starved of light due to required shutter speeds) is not reliable, hence why professional movie productions generally auto focus,
You mean manually focus, don't you? Or do you mean that if there's a person other than the one aiming the camera doing the focusing, that's autofocus?

Jim
 
The Zony 35/2.8 is an excellent travel lens. Be careful with the 24-105 on the a7RIII wrt vignetting correction. There is a lot of vignetting, and the in-camera correction can cause some ugly color-balance banding.

Jim
Yeah the 24-105 has pretty massive vignetting at 24mm - although it does seem to be more at the very extremes of the frame. I haven't found this to be a big issue because normally the extreme edges of the frame are not critical, but it is something to keep in mind. LR corrects most of it out, but I can see some circumstances where it might cause some issues, esp if you are underexposing the frame to capture a sunset for example.

Definitely switch off ALL in camera corrections, since they also seem to affect both jpeg and RAW on the Sony cameras.
 
If your going to keep the Sony, I would strongly recommend a grip or l-bracket.

It is kind of lame, but I also recommend this :)

https://sugru.com

I find the buttons for AF-on to be a bit too small for my fat thumb, so I used a bit of this to make the button a bit easier to use. This solution is also popular with the Fuji folks :)
 
So I returned my Z6 and ordered a A7RIII with the 24-105mm F/4 lens. I will see how this go and report my findings. I have a remorse now to be honest returning my Z6, but it was not the jack of all trades I was after.

The Sony A7 with a 35mm /2.8 Zeiss lens which has great reviews could be my best travel combo... Time will tell.
I hate to say it, but your going to kick yourself...you should have spent some time learning the video AF as the Z6 is currently the champ for both AF and IBIS in video.

Take a look at this video comparison, the guy has also done comparisons between the Z7 and the A7RIII and also the EOS R.

Thanks NexLupus for the above link.

I am clear favor of Z6, excellent IQ - contrast and color. AF was consistently better on Z6.

Really now an easy choice for me to eliminate A7ii !
 
The Zony 35/2.8 is an excellent travel lens. Be careful with the 24-105 on the a7RIII wrt vignetting correction. There is a lot of vignetting, and the in-camera correction can cause some ugly color-balance banding.

Jim
Yeah the 24-105 has pretty massive vignetting at 24mm - although it does seem to be more at the very extremes of the frame. I haven't found this to be a big issue because normally the extreme edges of the frame are not critical, but it is something to keep in mind. LR corrects most of it out, but I can see some circumstances where it might cause some issues, esp if you are underexposing the frame to capture a sunset for example.

Definitely switch off ALL in camera corrections, since they also seem to affect both jpeg and RAW on the Sony cameras.
Thanks, I noted only after someone previously mentioned it; as Sony viewer automatically corrects it in software as soon as you download it to the computer.

I also had an automatic lens profile applied in Photoshop camera raw, and that one also takes care of it..... go figure.

For portrait shots and objects at F4 is not too obvious , but it will be for landscape shots, which I do a lot...

Thanks again all.
 
Tim:

How many in camera corrections does it perform? Where in the menu system do you find these. I have the A7RII - does it do the same thing?

Thx
 
I currently have an A7ii and i am considering A7r2, Z6, Fuji X-T3. I really like the way the Z6 handles, but i dont care for the lens selection currently. im pretty sure i am going to go with the cheaper and smaller a7r2. X-t3 is my favorite handling and i like the lenses, but i fear i'll miss full frame quality too much.
 
One thing I'm curious about though: Why do you "hate the adapter?"

I think the FTZ adapter is fantastic. Using my AF-S lenses with the Z7 is seamless and IMO the adapter doesn't really add much to the overall system bulk/weight. Seems like an odd position to take.

That said, no camera/system is for everyone, and I hope the Sony brings you the performance and results you're looking for. Good luck!
 
I have a sigma MC11 adapter for my sony. It makes the camera unbalanced and basically as heavy/large as a traditional DSLR. The whole point of going to a mirrorless is to reduce weight and size. Its a nice stepping stone for people until native lenses are introduced though.

I am sure the performance of the nikon adapter is better then the sigma i use so thats another gripe i have with my setup.
 
Buttons252 wrote: The whole point of going to a mirrorless is to reduce weight and size.
Maybe in the beginning as a marketing excercise for brands trying to differentiate themsemsleves from the market leaders, but that's not why I bought into it. And there is a limit to smallness that completely disinterests me. I need to be able to hold the camera all day and be as comfortable at hour 14 as I was at hour 1.
 
Buttons252 wrote: The whole point of going to a mirrorless is to reduce weight and size.
Maybe in the beginning as a marketing excercise for brands trying to differentiate themsemsleves from the market leaders, but that's not why I bought into it. And there is a limit to smallness that completely disinterests me. I need to be able to hold the camera all day and be as comfortable at hour 14 as I was at hour 1.
You only work a 14 hour day? Nice :-D
 
Still not sure if I should go mirrorless..

For the price of Z6+FTZ.. I can get the 105/1.4 instead.. - If I get the Z6, there's no money left for new lens other than may be the 50S (and my 2.8/1.8/1.4 F mount lens are all good-old AF-D.. I am going to retire them and replace them with S versions in time).

It's hard to rent the 105/1.4 on weekends..

- But my D800 is showing its age.. well below the Z6/D500/D850 framerate to capture sports actions, and iso6400 is pretty much the max you can push it ..

Really I don't care about size that much.. I am a big guy with big hands. I want silent shooting (school plays), faster framerate (and better tracking focus), and higher image quality offer by the new S lens..
 
……. The whole point of going to a mirrorless is to reduce weight and size.
Weight & size is only one reason of many, and not the primary.

--
I like better one decent picture in a day than 10 bad ones in a second.
Registered on Dpreview since 2003.
 
Last edited:
I have a sigma MC11 adapter for my sony. It makes the camera unbalanced and basically as heavy/large as a traditional DSLR. The whole point of going to a mirrorless is to reduce weight and size. Its a nice stepping stone for people until native lenses are introduced though.

I am sure the performance of the nikon adapter is better then the sigma i use so thats another gripe i have with my setup.
What he said. Plus, I love my ai-s primes on my D810 where I can see the aperture changed in the viewfinder... I can see nada on the Z6... hate it.
 
Well your a7riii does not even have a non-CPU menu to set IBIS FL or give you anything and I do use Ai and Ais lenses on Sony.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top