EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM is a Five Star-lens!

Marco Nero

Veteran Member
Messages
7,703
Solutions
21
Reaction score
11,444
Location
Sydney, AU



Bokeh Samples


Architecture etc. The image below is a panorama stitched from four images.

.
Sharpness:
Without a doubt this is possibly the sharpest Canon lens I have used, offering neck-to-neck results for sharpness and optical performance comparable to the respected EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM lens. But without the weight or price tag. When shooting wide open at f/1.4, this lens is astoundingly sharp. I found that shooting the core of the Milky Way at night at f/1.4 produced sharp stars from corner to corner with only subtle coma visible towards the corners. Quite surprising at f/1.4.
.




People

.
Portraits:
This is a fairly decent focal length for portraits when APS-C is taken into consideration. I found no noticeable distortion and the images were flattering with both perspective and soft diffusion in the background with almost any aperture.
.
Speed of Operation:
There's sometimes a slow transition when the focus breathes from a VERY closeup subject near the lens to something in the distance but that's to be expected for videopgraphers or the effect would be too jarring. For objects at similar distances the lens is fast and snappy to respond. Using a tracking AF mode, I was able to catch great shots of people as they approached me or entered the frame from around corners. I thought the lens was great for street photography because it was small enough to go unnoticed. And the touch-AF and tracking feature made photography and video easy to accomplish.
.


Food

.
Closeup:
One of the big bonuses with this lens is how fantastic the Closeup ability is. According to Canon "you can fill the entire frame with a business card" and this turned out to be true. i find myself reaching for a Macro lens less and less when this lens is mounted to my EOS M6 camera. I can take a tiny Japanese cherry blossom and dominate the shot with it... or capture a piece of jewellery with plenty of room to spare. I took a picture of a neighbors flower that had a 1.5 inch long caterpillar munching away on the petals and I could make out the hairs and textured markings on its body clearly with some shallow DOF in play to make it interesting.
.
Lack of Image Stabilizer:
Canon seldom fit IS to their super-bright lenses and they obviously wanted to keep costs and complications down. For this reason I recommend showing caution when shooting at 1/60sec or slower with shaky hands. But this lens is so bright you'll hardly find this to be an issue. 1/80sec and faster is the safe zone because this lens equates to just over 50mm (equiv) when mounted on an APS-C sensor camera.
.


Lowlight (handheld)

.
Lowlight:

This is what made me want to buy this lens when it was announced. I find that the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens is a great lens for indoor lowlight use but there are times when you need to use a faster shutter speed or when you need to utilize the low available light in the room. I visited a candle-lit restaurant in a basement the week before this lens was released and I had a lot of problems with the f/2 lens that an f/1.4 lens would have made easier. AF with a bright lens is always much easier than with a darker lens with a smaller aperture. I found I could handhold on the street without needing to lean against a pole for support when using this new lens. And it's very nice to see Canon producing a faster Prime lens for the M-series. I spent last night shooting video of my cats playing on a bed with a single low-output bulb behind a lamp shade and the results were great. The motor was silent enough not to distract the cats.
.



.
Astrophotography:
This lens was almost too bright and so a dark sky with a soon-to-rise moon cresting the horizon. It's just a little too narrow with the 50mm (equiv) field of view to capture a majestic and WIDE night shot of the Milky Way splashed across the sky. You'll need a wider lens for that type of shot. The EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens lends itself well to a framed but wider shot of this subject. But for comets or a tighter shot of the Galactic Core... I think this is a very handy astro lens. It's so bright that I had to knock my ISO down ISO 800 for some of my shots when approaching 8+ second exposures. Shooting for 15 seconds with ISO 1600 at f/1.4 produced very bold results that needed some toning down during processing. As noted, this lens produced no real discernible coma although it was there in the corners yet controlled very well compared to lenses like the EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM. Shooting the city in the distance at night produced nice diffraction spikes at f/7.1 and I think this will be the lens to use for some comet-related subjects in the night sky. Handheld shots of a faint crescent moon obscured by thin cloud was possible from a dark street at midnight with no street lighting. Nebulous colors and extremely faint stars showed up in test shots of the Galactic Core. A NiSi Natural Night Filter was tested with this lens and produced attractive results. I'll post an example shortly. The NiSi filter was 77mm and step-up rings were used to mount this filter to the 43mm threads on this lens. See notes below in relation to the use of step-rings with this lens.

Color Rendition:
Colors are excellent with this lens with acceptable levels of contrast in all situations. With the exception of certain times when I used a Circular Polarizer (which will warm up and over-saturate some colors) I found this lens produced appealing natural colors which were then enhanced further by my settings (which increased some color saturation). Nice results overall. Neon is often a hard color to capture accurately with a digital camera and the lens usually has some influence with the results. I liked the color accuracy and noticed no greenish tinges etc to the resulting images.
.




Wildlife (uncropped)

.
Pets and Wildlife:

This is a good lens for this type of subject although with such a shallow DOF available when shooting wide open, you'll need to pick your target zone. If I photograph my cats and their heads are turned slightly, only one eye will be in focus. With the new DPAF sensors this lens is fast and accurate. Up close to an animal you may find that the focus may lock on an individual eyelash or even a reflection on the eyeball... that's how shallow the DOF can either benefit or hinder you. Fortunately the Magnify Feature on the Canon EOS M camera will assist when dealing with complex scenes.

Noise during Operation:
It's fast, accurate and silent when shooting video due to the STM motor. But with so much breathing and travel when shifting focus from Near to Far (or vice versa) the lens does seem to produce a sound when engaging with super-close subjects that is just barely audible in a quiet room (although it's more keenly felt by your hand holding the camera).

Lens Hood:
Canon release da very large (almost oversized) and optional tubular lens hood for this lens called the ES-60. I thought the price was a little high and availability was scarce when I picked up my lens so I purchased the Canon EW-60F lens hood instead. This is a Petal Design which was released for the EF-M 18-150mm lens and yet, with a little pressure during first use.... It can and does fit onto the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM lens. It also offers more access for your fingers when adjusting, adding or removing filters on the lens.

Price:
For what you're paying for, the price is acceptable but some may consider it slightly steep unless you realize this lens ought to be branded with a red ring due to stellar performance. I'd have liked to have seen this lens sell for just a little less yet it's worth every penny as it is. Do you need it? No. But does it take shots the other EF-M lenses can't? Yes it does.

Summary:
Overall, this has been a very rewarding lens to own and use. It's small and affordable and it's light enough for me to clip the rig to my belt or harness when hiking. The comparison to a similar lens on a Full Frame DSLR is enormous and I walked into several locations where photography was frowned upon with my camera in hand and nobody gave me a second glance. I recommend this lens highly and congratulate Canon for producing such high performance in a lens this size and at this price. It's incredibly light at just 235 g (0.52 lb) and with a minimum focus of 0.23 m (9.06") it's a very versatile lens. The only time I've swapped it over was when I needed a wider lens for certain broad landscapes.
.


Landscapes with this lens

.
Filter Use:
I used four different CPL and UV filters with this lens and settled on 43mm Hoya UV "FUSION" filter and a 43mm Hoya "FUSION/ECO" Circular Polarizing filter for continued use based on my needs. The CPL filters always tend to warm up some color hues but there was no vignetting. It should be noted that several other users and myself encountered odd results when fitting Step-up rings for using larger filters on this lens. All of the Step-up rings came from China and none would seat properly on the threads of the lens. They'd just keep turning and turning without locking down hard on the lens. We have a theory that the same cutting dies were used for these step rings, regardless of the sellers. Additionally I had mounted 5 different filters directly on the lens without any issues. Another user noted that the 43mm filter mount ring that comes with the 28mm lens doesn't mount to the 32mm lens either... although that is a specialized ring that was never intended for the 32mm lens. Due to the focal length, sky 'Banding' was not an issue with the use of CPL filters.

Focus Limiter Switch:
There's also a Focus Limiter switch on the side of the lens so that if you as shooting through grass or foliage, the lens will not lock on the nearby plants or subjects if they are within a short distance from the lens. Otherwise the lens will lock onto the closest target when the AF focus reticule is overlaid over any subject. I used this feature once to allowed me to shoot through a glass window with rain droplets on the surface and found the switch effective. The switch is marked: "0.23m/0.76ft-Infinity"

Minor Extrusion of outer Optics during operation:
I was shooting without a lens hood against a store window to try and capture an image of wrist watches and felt the lens push away from the glass display window. The inner optical element extrudes by just a few millimeters when the lens is focusing on very CLOSE subjects. But the optics do not rotate and this has no effect on polarizing filters. Most users may not notice this. For those unable to grasp the knurled edges of a CPL filter to remove it, extruding this element slightly (by forcing the lens to focus on something close) will afford more finger purchase on the edges of the filter for dismounting it.
.


Flowers and shallow DOF

.
I hope this information is of use to those contemplating this lens. It's fun to own and appears to be both robustly built but has no history of bad (or inconsistent) copies out there. I think it's a solid performer with a lot of versatility since it's sharp, bright and capable of near-macro closeups without complications.



_______________

* The images here are from the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM lens
* They were all taken in JPEG and are uncropped.
* A Hoya 43mm FUSION (aka ECO) Circular Polarizer was used for some shots in sunlight.
* A Hoya 43mm HMC UV filter was used all the time.
* They have been gently batch-tweaked in Lightroom and Photoshop before resizing and saving.


--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 

Attachments

  • 3831251.jpg
    3831251.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831255.jpg
    3831255.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831257.jpg
    3831257.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831252.jpg
    3831252.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831253.jpg
    3831253.jpg
    925 KB · Views: 0
  • 3831259.jpg
    3831259.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831254.jpg
    3831254.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831258.jpg
    3831258.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 3831256.jpg
    3831256.jpg
    905.3 KB · Views: 0
Great review and pictures, i must have this lense. 🙂 Thanks.
 
Normally these lens reviews ALWAYS end up in the "SLR Lens" forum. Good to see it's ended up here in the M-forum instead for a change.
 
The 1 Nikkor 32mm f/1.2 really is a scam compares to this one with half the price.
 
Marco. Since you convinced me to get it its hardly been off my M50. the M50 + 32mm combo is my most used kit, and its helped me to realised i really dont need my 5D4 any more.
 
Good report. I may have to spend money....

But 7000+ pictures in 24 hours? What were you doing? Assuming you actaully had the camera in your hand for 12 hours out of the 24, that's nearly 10 pictures a minute. Every minute. All day. :-D:-D
 
Good report. I may have to spend money....

But 7000+ pictures in 24 hours? What were you doing? Assuming you actaully had the camera in your hand for 12 hours out of the 24, that's nearly 10 pictures a minute. Every minute. All day. :-D:-D
He's keen, ill give him that lol.
 
Nice review. Great jobs.

I think the price is cheap considering that this takes pictures like an L lens.

I want to see what Canon will do with the M's before I invest anymore $ in the platform. They are supposed to come out with a new generation of M5/M6 after the New Year.
 
Good report. I may have to spend money....

But 7000+ pictures in 24 hours? What were you doing? Assuming you actaully had the camera in your hand for 12 hours out of the 24, that's nearly 10 pictures a minute. Every minute. All day. :-D:-D
He's keen, ill give him that lol.
Hang on there Matey, Earlier this year I shot 2,934 shots over 3.5 hours when using the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS II USM lens on the EOS M6 (when photographing surfers on the beach) before I needed to change batteries to shoot the Moon from the side of the freeway on the way home. Try the math on that set. (Thread: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60674296 ). What was that? 13.971 shots per minute? That's merely the press of a button for a few seconds. If I CHIMP the shot once in a while to ensure key images were captures before moving on, I get a pretty high rate of success. My M6 is always set to High Burst Mode and I vary the number of shots each time i take a picture based on need.
.
I don't shoot in RAW. This gives me better bursts with less powerdrain, faster write times and more memory card to cram. With my city shots I then stayed up to edit images, grabbed 3.5 hours sleep and then returned to shooting again with fresh batteries. I had my wife drive so i could shoot through the side window of my car (and just in case I fell asleep on the way back to the city).
.
When testing the EF 32mm f/1.4 STM lens I took around 2200 shots in the Chinese Friendship Garden alone (mostly shooting in burst mode ). I changed tact at brunch to shoot seagulls and tried to nail their eyes with the Magnify Feature while eating a hotdog with my free hand and wave off other hungry birds. I started out with a spray-and-pray approach early in the day and ended up running through 1800+ shots in the museum due to the complexity and randomness with the plasma discharge display. Only some shots of a raven in a tree were out of focus. I even took time to take pictures of tourists with their own cameras and I spent an hour on the phone avoiding the heat outside whilst inside the air-conditioned museum.... where I shot another 1300 shots of the Plasma Ball in action.... and then shot bursts throughout the harbor and on the freeway. I shot people walking into frame from around corners using AF tracking. I shot people walking towards me. Birds near boats. Ice cream being sold and afternoon light playing on buildings reflected in the water. I shot fountains in daylight and then shot them again when they lit up at dusk. I shot under bridges, in hotel foyers and around the opera house. I shot people exiting a convention, walking with us back to the car, costumes, our parked car and then food over dinner. I then returned to the city and shot in the arcades, the wharf, the old part of the town and then on the quay. I shot through lunch and then into the following evening with people in costume.
.
I held back to rest. I'm pretty sure I could have racked up more if the opportunity was there. The inside of my right palm had a slight bruise from gripping the Peak Design clip on the bottom of the camera for the entirety of the day. And I had to cut and file the nails on my right hand right back to the skin to prevent them from cutting into the rubber on the inside of the M6 grip. Otherwise, it's 'easy peasy' to nail a few thousand shots in just a few of hours when shooting in burst mode Even easier on a beach with a larger lens and a monopod. I don't need to use Burst Mode but I was busy and wanted to nail as many ideal 'samples' as I could bag so that I could post up some samples right here for others to pick over when the lens was first released.
 
Good report. I may have to spend money....

But 7000+ pictures in 24 hours? What were you doing? Assuming you actaully had the camera in your hand for 12 hours out of the 24, that's nearly 10 pictures a minute. Every minute. All day. :-D:-D
I sure did. See details in reply below/above this one...

--
Regards,
Marco Nero.
 
Last edited:
Marco. Since you convinced me to get it its hardly been off my M50. the M50 + 32mm combo is my most used kit, and its helped me to realised i really dont need my 5D4 any more.
I find that I rarely use my full frame DSLRs these days. I still have use for them but the M6 + 'insert lens of choice' is always able to deliver decent results. There will be times when I need to use an EF lens with a FF sensor though but it's rare these days. The last time I used a DSLR was several months ago. The M6 is always right next to me on my desk and I reach for it whenever I need to capture something. Like you, the 32mm lens is always on it and I really should swap over to the EF-M 28mm Macro now that the summer critters are out now here in Australia. That lens has been very good to me in the past and, like other EF-M lenses, is quite flexible in use.
 
Marco, i was only commenting on the post before mine, and didn't think it was accurate as such.
 
I also own this lens. IS would be nice when shooting static objects in very low light. But there is also other thing this lens is really missing: Red ring!
 
Marco,

Stop posting these excellent reviews, my bank account can't take it!

Seriously, your reviews on the M series and EF-M lenses helped me make the decision to go with this system. One M50 and four lenses later I'm broke, but happy! This lens is next on my list. Looking forward to your next photo review.
 
I ordered from my local camera shop a few days ago. Just a few hours ago I received the call that it's there waiting for me. Can't wait to start shooting with it as well!

I really hope this lens does well so Canon will come out with more fast primes and perhaps a constant aperture zoom in the future!
 
Thanks a lot for your work.

Could you compare the low light focus abilties of the 32 mm and the 22 mm.

Please keep with your reviews.

Thanks again :)
 
Marco,

Stop posting these excellent reviews, my bank account can't take it!

Seriously, your reviews on the M series and EF-M lenses helped me make the decision to go with this system. One M50 and four lenses later I'm broke, but happy! This lens is next on my list. Looking forward to your next photo review.
I'm glad you're happy with your decision with camera and lenses. I'd hate to steer someone into getting something they don't want or need. This lens isn't expensive overly expensive so hopefully people will adopt it if their photography has use or need for it. There will ALWAYS be things out there that we want to own but don't really NEED to have. I try to think hard before buying anything these days. It's VERY easy to accumulate lenses that we don't often use. I think there's always a "favorite".
 
Thanks for that extensive review with great photos!

I posted my short collection of my first impressions to months ago on a much lower basis of experience - it's good to see that the much deeper review of you came to the same principal conclusion! Was not always shure if I was only impressed by a "new-item-experience" or by its intrinsic qualities :)

Today the "Only lens if you go to an isolated island!" of my choice
 
Wow!

That's quite a review and better than most I have seen here on dpreview.

I just have my old original slow as nails but still great in it's own ways original EOS-M.

I've decided to "sit out" upgrading it until at least next year. Canon normally clears stuff out at xmas then comes out with stuff you wish you waited for early in the following year so we'll see what the M system and R systems bring in 2019.............
 
I also own this lens. IS would be nice when shooting static objects in very low light. But there is also other thing this lens is really missing: Red ring!
L is not just about IQ, although I agree this lens holds its own against some of the top Canon lenses, as far as IQ goes. In fact ive had L lenses that have not been as sharp.

Also agree that IS would be the icing no the cake.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top