This month through your adapted lenses - November 2018

Thanks for the thoughts, appreciate it.
Havent played in a while. Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 for EF

cb8c83268cc44705a1997a44a7f2cd88.jpg
This has a nice atmosphere; I think it'd work a little better if you moved in closer to that solitary fencepost, make it a little more prominent.
This one's almost the opposite; good focus on the planter, but I'd like to see more of the foggy atmosphere.
This one's just about perfect!

--
Flickr at https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_prof67/ Warning: Heavy Learning in progress.


--
----------------------------------------------
MattParvin.com
It’s a lot easier to post a photo than it is to write 1,000 words...
“I believe there is nothing more disturbing than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept” ~ AA
 
Just testing out my new A7RIII with a recently bought Shift lens. The lens in particular is the Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm f3.5. I'm surprised by the sharpness and reduced CA for such an old lens.

  • Some Apartments at Park Merced. A7RIII w/ Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm f3.5 - 1/1000 ISO 800, forgot the aperture. Somewhere between f/11 and f/32
Some of the old Zuiko glass is amazing, even by todays standards. Many suffer quite bad vignetting however but this might be the price of such physically small lenses . One of my Zuiko 1.4/50's is about equal in stopped down sharpness to the sony zeiss sonnar 1.8/55 which is the sharpest lens i own, even compared to leica Summicron-R 50. Zuikos can be superb.
 
I like the first best, followed by the third. The second is pretty busy, and the bokeh in the third is more intrusive than I'd like. (Reminds me a lot of the bokeh from the Yashica ML 50/1.7 - not quite swirly, but starting to suggest it.
This particular Tessar lens has what is apparently known as a “Vorwahlspringblende” . Which means that the aperture is set by pressing down the aperture ring and then turning it. If you just turn the aperture ring the aperture blades will reset to the initial position. It is an all aluminium construction and looks cute :-)
Ooh, sounds interesting. :) Can you post a pic or two of the lens?


cf30f7d4b66945ca91854cd835ffded6.jpg

The red "arrowhead" indicates what aperture is set. (On mine it is a little off-set).

Thanks for taking the time to comment and I agree with your rating :-).

--
Vintage person with a bit of a thing for vintage lenses...
 
I love that lens. It's wonderfully versatile (portrait, landscape, and macro) and very sharp. I must admit, I am more interested in the guy in the hat to the right. Nice.
 
That is a very nicely done portrait. A really nice combination of colors and lighting. Also, did you change your sd14 mount by yourself?

Regards,

Dan
 
More Voigtlander, 40mm f/2 for Canon.



58555211735143e7a5312dc89adc80b2.jpg



4f93375521d64f2db7b68a7cae094ea0.jpg



d196af218cec4b419184194484a3f59c.jpg



6f69573a1e3144129943d28e942ebe4b.jpg





e3a77e49114141a78dfacc3a038abbb5.jpg



--
----------------------------------------------
MattParvin.com
It’s a lot easier to post a photo than it is to write 1,000 words...
“I believe there is nothing more disturbing than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept” ~ AA
 
This is a really good one! Good light, good composition, and I like the silhouettes in the background.
Glad you liked it. I was in the middle of a chat with a photographer, and light on the model got me :)
 
I love that lens. It's wonderfully versatile (portrait, landscape, and macro) and very sharp. I must admit, I am more interested in the guy in the hat to the right. Nice.
So do I. But there is a congestion in that focal length that it rarely finds a place in the bag. Still, when it takes the job, hardly disappoints.

As for the mysterious gentleman, this weekend same event will take place again and my eyes will be in search for episode II. Problem is that it will be a cold and ugly December opening with little hope for a nice shoot-out.
 
I guess this is what my son was thinking, but I needed a test subject.

I just received the first adapters to be used with my Z7 and I stacked a MD2LTM and LTM2Z to try the Minolta 45/2 … I am very impressed. This lens gets a new lease of life. Some glow wide open and truly sharp and nice from 2.8.

Z7 + Minolta MD45/2 @ f/2.8
Z7 + Minolta MD45/2 @ f/2.8

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/fpessolano/collections
https://500px.com/fpessolano
 
Last edited:
Thank you :) I might.
 
Thank you :)

Yes, I made a DIY camera mount exchange.
 
I received a 1958 Industar-50, calibrated to Leica. Hilarious thought that the lens is worth less than 1% of the camera :-D

Just a few quick test-snaps.



3111a343b9db4d08a0dcc99a40917b7e.jpg



wide open
wide open



137257a7fddc40d8b02e5f16f40514d4.jpg



e8c30cff103f4725ac4294c64db38a1c.jpg
 
Thanks!

I forgot to add this one, with the sun in the frame.

The lens is not prone to flaring, ghosting etc, which is probably its most remarkable quality.



6b547792a3cc4205b3efe93019f34dae.jpg
 
Thanks!

I forgot to add this one, with the sun in the frame.

The lens is not prone to flaring, ghosting etc, which is probably its most remarkable quality.

6b547792a3cc4205b3efe93019f34dae.jpg
It effectively has only 3 elements, a 4/3 tessar where 2 elements are cemented, so not a huge surprise.

TBH i think this lenses claim to fame is kind of lame because it's always related to its negligible cost, my copy was free. Once you take cost out of the debate it doesn't have too much left to offer as the performance of tessars is limited in the level of correction they can achieve. I don't even use mine as i see little point.
 
Thanks!

I forgot to add this one, with the sun in the frame.

The lens is not prone to flaring, ghosting etc, which is probably its most remarkable quality.
It effectively has only 3 elements, a 4/3 tessar where 2 elements are cemented, so not a huge surprise.
Well, I have quite a few other single-coated lenses from the fifties that are much more prone to all kinds of flare, ghosting etc. I think the slow aperture & small front element also helps. But then again, my Orion-15 flares like crazy...
TBH i think this lenses claim to fame is kind of lame because it's always related to its negligible cost, my copy was free. Once you take cost out of the debate it doesn't have too much left to offer as the performance of tessars is limited in the level of correction they can achieve. I don't even use mine as i see little point.
I can see myself using this one during summer or other situations with strong sunlight, where my Sonnars will be more challenging. But I'm not too fond of the handling of this version, a rigid; the collapsible with focusing tab is more convenient for focusing, although the aperture is annoying on those.
 
Looking nice! I think the second is my favorite, both for the subject and the composition.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top