Who wants a Aps-H R?

Just asking. I love this sensor size. Still using 1d MK IIN. Love it.

Plus it would make an interesting combo with Sigma 18-35 1.8 and 50-100 1.8.
The 18-35mm doesn’t work that well with APS-H. The 50-100mm does work well. For the most part you’d be better off replacing the 18-35 with the full frame 24-35mm f/2.

The 5DS/R had crop modes for APS-H and APS-C. Unlike the R it still captured 50MP RAWs which meant you still had the file sizes. The crop modes were treated as pretty central features of those cameras

Yes I would really like if they implemented an APS-H crop on the R (which would be around 18MP - would be nice to use with lenses like the 50-100mm. Otherwise a new R with high resolution might be on the horizon and hopefully have a number of crop options again.
 
I just shoot FF and crop in post for the percise amount of viggenite I want from the 18-35mm. I cam can get about 20+mp at 18mm and full 30mp at 35mm. It's actually a wonderful 35mm f/1.8 FF prime! My Tokina 11-16mm is also my preferred landscape prime at 16mm f/2.8 on FF.

Having the larger chip and shooting all the pixels is just better
 
I just shoot FF and crop in post for the percise amount of viggenite I want from the 18-35mm. I cam can get about 20+mp at 18mm and full 30mp at 35mm. It's actually a wonderful 35mm f/1.8 FF prime! My Tokina 11-16mm is also my preferred landscape prime at 16mm f/2.8 on FF.

Having the larger chip and shooting all the pixels is just better
 
I just shoot FF and crop in post for the percise amount of viggenite I want from the 18-35mm. I cam can get about 20+mp at 18mm and full 30mp at 35mm. It's actually a wonderful 35mm f/1.8 FF prime! My Tokina 11-16mm is also my preferred landscape prime at 16mm f/2.8 on FF.

Having the larger chip and shooting all the pixels is just better
So it gives you about 24mm to 35mm... seems like a lot of pointless bother given other lenses available.

Tokina 11-16mm is beyond useless on full frame (despite the myths).
Why? Mine is the most used lens for landscapes, I can't find a cheaper 16mm f/2.8! And it's actually really good!
 
I just shoot FF and crop in post for the percise amount of viggenite I want from the 18-35mm. I cam can get about 20+mp at 18mm and full 30mp at 35mm. It's actually a wonderful 35mm f/1.8 FF prime! My Tokina 11-16mm is also my preferred landscape prime at 16mm f/2.8 on FF.

Having the larger chip and shooting all the pixels is just better
So it gives you about 24mm to 35mm... seems like a lot of pointless bother given other lenses available.

Tokina 11-16mm is beyond useless on full frame (despite the myths).
Why? Mine is the most used lens for landscapes, I can't find a cheaper 16mm f/2.8! And it's actually really good!
Sorry you said it was an awesome 16mm prime, not that it was good because it was cheap. The coverage is there (mostly) but like most lenses when moving up to bigger formats, coverage does not equal quality. The corners are poor no matter what you do with it. It’s just reality.

Irix and Samyang offer some really great low cost primes around these FLs.

The 18-35mm has these issues to a lesser extent. Definitely seem better off with the full frame designed lenses.
 
Last edited:
Just asking. I love this sensor size. Still using 1d MK IIN. Love it.

Plus it would make an interesting combo with Sigma 18-35 1.8 and 50-100 1.8.
There's very little point these days in having a slightly smaller sensor. It was different back when the 1D was launched, when it made a huge difference to cost. And there have never been any wide angle lenses for this crop factor.
I see a personal need for FF, for wide angle and shallow DOF. I see a personal need for high-density APS-C, or maybe even a bit smaller.

I see little personal need for APS-H, per se, but if it were available with higher pixel density than APS-C, I might consider it, if the burst speed and video rates were not impeded.
 
Better to make a +100MP FF where you can choose the cropfactor from 1.0 to 2.0 in 0.1 step with increased frame rate and decreased raw file size with the crop.
... or just let the user design their own crop modes.
However it would preferable need a binning mode for full frame rate also with crop factor 1 and 1/4 file size. Question is if this is possible? IF so perhaps quad pixel AF with either +100 or +25 MP. Let’s say 16 FPS at 25MP cropped or FF binned and perhaps 4 FPS at 100MP. Guess it’s not possible since it’s not done.
Pixels that are split for AF detection can not be used independently for imaging, unless you can pull the microlenses off of the sensor. Your four quarter pixels do not see 4 different locations in the scene; they see the same point in the scene from 4 different quarters of the entrance pupil.
 
Just asking. I love this sensor size. Still using 1d MK IIN. Love it.

Plus it would make an interesting combo with Sigma 18-35 1.8 and 50-100 1.8.
Where do I pre-order?

Cheers,

Jose
 
Is it in any way possible to bin pixels when using Bayer filter?

I think there where some discussion around that for some mobile phone sensor a while ago.
 
Just asking. I love this sensor size. Still using 1d MK IIN. Love it.

Plus it would make an interesting combo with Sigma 18-35 1.8 and 50-100 1.8.
I still have the 1dmk3 which is APS-H 10mp but these days I mostly use the 7Dmk2 gives me more reach for wildlife but I would definitely be interested in a 24mp in APS-H in a mirrorless but something that has performance like a Sony A9 The current Canon R is just awful.
 
Is it in any way possible to bin pixels when using Bayer filter?

I think there where some discussion around that for some mobile phone sensor a while ago.
There's no nice way to do this for color (you're asking a resampling purist). Try it yourself. Take the pattern:

RGRGRGRG...
GBGBGBGB...
RGRGRGRG...
GBGBGBGB...
RGRGRGRG...
GBGBGBGB...
....

... then, draw squares surrounding 2x2 tiles of blue and also for red, and then on 2x2 diamonds for the greens. Now matter how you decide where to make the groups, you get a lopsided, asymmetrical mess, and there is no way to demosaic it without damaging it further, unless you demosaic back to the original full resolution, because the weighted centers of these tiles fall in a grid at the original resolution. Even before you draw groups in the green channel, it is obvious that the red and blue channels are going to have weighted centers one diagonal original pixel apart.

This wouldn't matter much if the pixel density was high enough to oversample the optics, to begin with, but it's not, and people like their acuity, and you're going to lose it like that. You have to blur either the red or blue channel significantly to get the image to an output pixel count 1/4 the original. One would hope that binning 4 pixels into one and quartering the MPs would result in an output that was more like a Foveon with three colors at each pixel, but this would be nothing like that, really, as colors would be spread by the devil that is resampling.

For monochrome, you could get away with ignoring the CFA and pretend that the sensor was monochrome, and bin 2x2 tiles of pixels, but the results will have the underlying 3 color bands shifted on a diagonal with green in the center. You won't see this as color fringing, but it can express as a diagonal directional blur.
 
It's not just about bokeh. It's overall image quality difference. Simply, bigger sensor = better image quality. It's not about manufacturer or lenses. That is physics. Fuji makes very capable cameras but image quality can't be compared with bigger sensors system. So seriously, who is fine with that image quality Fuji can be good choice.
If “Bigger is Better” were so plainly true then smartphones wouldn’t be getting half the quality that they are.

Smaller sensors allow for more expensive manufacturing processes, it is possible, however unlikely, for APS-C to give equivalent noise performance at the same cost as a Full Frame sensor.

If you compare the 6D2 and Fuji X-T3 then it could be argued we have an existing case of two current products where APS-C performs the same as Full Frame (I know the X-T3 is not quite on the same level as the 6D2 but it’s way closer than Canon should have ever allowed).
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top