I have shown many times now the x-t100 to be a potent camera, it is extremely accurate in its focus acquisition, why dpr found it like it did and others is a mystery, but in real world applications it is hard to tell the x-t2 and the x-t100 apart, incl c-af!
Irrelevent, is it responsive, yes, it’s the same as the all the other Fuji’s bar probably x-t3 which I have never tested!
1080p is actually very good, who really goes around shooting loads of 4K and dealing with those crazy video files! Try playing 1080 on a 4K screen, they are almost indistinguishable!
Nope, it isn’t
8 vs 6, big wow
it shoots 30 odd jpegs in burst!
the x-t100 has great coverag, better than many if not all DSLR, do they complain
really, in what context, it goes from iso100 to 25600
I prefer the af/my function button on the screen over every single camera I have owned, it is infinitely better than that stupid dial on the front! What about the programmable dial on the top left, the fan buttons on the screen, not including the af/my one, come get real
No way, the x-t100looks so much nicer than the x-t20 it’s a bit of an ugly thing to look at the x-t20
There are not and when it all comes down to it, the x-t100 has something the others will never have!
The trouble is you are literally the only user or reviewer of this camera to say that, or even suggest it. Even you must see that calls your testimony into doubt. It doesn’t matter how many times you say it (and you have said it many times), not a single solitary soul seems to agree with you.
He does also consider the touch screen as great too which I find highly amusing. You have to give it to Sony that they only go as far in this technology as they can actually cope with and leave it at touch focus. Nice to see someone enthusiastic about their kit but there are limits.
Wrong
Where you want them, 3x3 and 5x5 are more or less what everyone uses for c-af, zone, ie you move the camera to follow the target!
wrong
who cares, I want to track with zone 3x3 and 5x5 and it works admirably, I haven’t seen much bif from you, maybe you can demonstrate some action shots!
No, wrong
wrong
nope, wrong
well 90% on this forum aren’t even interested in anything that moves faster than a snail anyway so they’ll be fine!
What are you yourself comparing the X-T100 with?
Name any m43 camera over the last 9/10 years, I have had them all just about!
Well, I think you might find x-t100 is no slouch.
Well it’s annoying, most read reviews and that’s it, they don’t ever try anything for themselves!
I can only tell it how I find it, I prefer the x-t100 to Pana G9 and Sony a6500, I love Pana with a passion but the pd-af of the x-t100 is more assured and more reliable than the G9 in my hands and that’s what counts to me!
I'm of the opinion that it's the same processor, clocked down in FW. Why spend R&D on making a slower processor? Canon and Nikon have crippled hardware in their cheaper cameras. Fuji might have built-in the ability to keep the X-T100 alive for a longer model cycle through FW updates that open up performance, not unlike they did with the X-E2 that went from sluggish AF to the same speed as the X-T1.
I have one and it is OK. I prefer the X-A3 in some ways as three buttons on the X-T100 have wandered to the top and opposite ends of the camera. Presumably to handle the indent to the screen lift point but it does make it less pleasant to operate.
Post your touch focus and start up results, we’ll move on to real world caf later, you can start posting your action shots if you want?
Well Sir, I love my gear too and I can’t get any more sincere than what I am! I await others af touch focus testing indoor into a window, low shutter, low ambient light!
Is your flash not named Bruce?
Imaging-resource.com measured autofocus speed of the X-T20 at .2 second, and of the X-A5 at .3 second, so not very different. They hadn't measured the X-T100 last time I looked. The X-T2 and X-T3 are faster.
DPreview does not provide any objective measurements of single-shot autofocus speed, which is why I look at imaging-resource.com for these numbers. As I posted above, the X-T20 is not significantly faster than the X-A5, which might or might not be the same as the X-T100. The X-T3 is faster, especially for tracking.
The fact it is cheap is for several reasons;
I would agree with this sentiment, in fact I would suggest everyone adds and x-t100 to their options.
Interesting! I prefer the look of the X-A5, especially the "pink" one that looks somewhat red.
Aren't they both f/5.6 at the long end? Maybe you mean that towards the long end, the 15-45 stops down sooner as it zooms.
