Wayne Larmon
Forum Pro
I upgraded my desktop solely to test A.I. Gigapixel because the first versions didn't run without crashing unless you had a better video card than I had (Geforce 640 with one gig VRAM). But the newest version that was released a few days ago now has a "CPU only" option that doesn't require a GPU. Topaz says that it runs up to five times slower than if you have a GPU that meets their requirements. But this is useful if you just want to try AIG out without investing any money. (I'd suggest testing it with crops that don't have many megapixels.)Thanks Wayne. I'll want to try AI Gigapixel too. There are many 5MP files from the older camera.I don't game, don't do 3D, don't do panos or stitching, don't do complicated Photoshop and (currently) don't edit video. But I just upgraded my old i7 2600K machine with a new power supply and 1070 Ti (with lots of help from this forum) solely to experiment with Topaz A.I. Gigapixel. (Currently being discussed on the Retouching forum.)
And I'm happy I did. It is exhilarating to revisit my beloved early 2000s four and six megapixel images that I could never print as large as I wanted to and be able to upsize them so they are usable at higher resolutions (and on my 320 PPI 4K laptop.)
A.I. Gigapixel wants all the GPU you can throw at it (if you are upsizing to the 50+ megapixel range.) It is very GPU intensive.
Wayne![]()
I told a friend about the new version earlier today (after telling about my experiences with AIG the past few weeks.) He immediately downloaded, installed it on his approx. $500 laptop and started processing his first image, all while we were having our phone conversation.
Wayne