Resolution aside, is there any reason to buy the Z7 over the Z6?

I’ve been planning on purchasing a Z6 once the reviews are out. My reasoning is that I really am fine with 24MP, and that the Z6 should have better low light performance.

But, now I’m wondering if this is the right choice. Other than the 45MP, is there any other reason I might want a Z7 over a Z6?
A tiny tiny reason for me is that the Z6 doesn't offer a 5x4 crop but the Z7 does. I don't like the 3:2 ratio and tend to work with 5x4 or 1:1 ratios.

For some bizarre reason only the Z7 offers the 5x4 ratio. Unless this is a mistake in the comparison table in the brochure.

Coupled with that, is the one you have already stated, but is more relevant as I could get 5x4 and 1:1 ratio crops and still get decent resolution from the Z7.

Having said all that, my primary reason, at least initially, for buying into a Z camera will be for video, and the Z6 seems the better choice for this, given the big price difference.

Cheers,

Graham
I posted a question about the 5:4 ratio on the NikonUSA product forum, and they confirmed that the Z6 does NOT have 5:4 crop, while the Z7 does.
 
I’ve been planning on purchasing a Z6 once the reviews are out. My reasoning is that I really am fine with 24MP, and that the Z6 should have better low light performance.

But, now I’m wondering if this is the right choice. Other than the 45MP, is there any other reason I might want a Z7 over a Z6?
A tiny tiny reason for me is that the Z6 doesn't offer a 5x4 crop but the Z7 does. I don't like the 3:2 ratio and tend to work with 5x4 or 1:1 ratios.

For some bizarre reason only the Z7 offers the 5x4 ratio. Unless this is a mistake in the comparison table in the brochure.

Coupled with that, is the one you have already stated, but is more relevant as I could get 5x4 and 1:1 ratio crops and still get decent resolution from the Z7.

Having said all that, my primary reason, at least initially, for buying into a Z camera will be for video, and the Z6 seems the better choice for this, given the big price difference.

Cheers,

Graham
I posted a question about the 5:4 ratio on the NikonUSA product forum, and they confirmed that the Z6 does NOT have 5:4 crop, while the Z7 does.
B&H has the specs wrong then. They show that the Z6 does have a 5:4 crop mode, but no 16:9 crop.
 
I posted a question about the 5:4 ratio on the NikonUSA product forum, and they confirmed that the Z6 does NOT have 5:4 crop, while the Z7 does.
Thanks, I was hoping the Nikon brochure might have it wrong, but unless Nikon were just quoting the brochure (which is always possible), and don't actually "know" then it looks as there is indeed this odd difference between the two cameras.

Cheers,

Graham
 
I posted a question about the 5:4 ratio on the NikonUSA product forum, and they confirmed that the Z6 does NOT have 5:4 crop, while the Z7 does.
B&H has the specs wrong then. They show that the Z6 does have a 5:4 crop mode, but no 16:9 crop.
Certainly just as the brochure has the 5x4 crop missing from the Z6, the 16x 9 crop is listed for both cameras.

Cheers,

Graham
 
I wonder who, except for landscape photogs, will go for the Z7. If the tracking AF and buffer were at D850 level, then, yes, especially for wildlife and action shooters, using DX crop, but not even Nikon is saying anything about action photography.
Hi.

I am currently using Pentax, mostly for landscapes/hiking photos.

The reason I would pick the Z7 is the extra dynamic range but not so much the resolution, I am quite happy with 24MP.

Is there any information about the Z6's sensor and its dynamic range at base ISO, compared to the Z7's base ISO?

Thank you!
 
The Z6 would be an obvious choice for those adding it to a D8XX based system. It should provide BETTER OOC high ISO performance than the Z7 or D8XX cameras and will be better for video.

For those looking to buy a PRIMARY camera, the 46MP has obvious benefits. But I'd never choose a Z7 over a D850 and the Z7 is hugely redundant next to my D850.

The Z6 is the way to go and I do think it's the smarter buy overall.

Rob
 
I wonder who, except for landscape photogs, will go for the Z7. If the tracking AF and buffer were at D850 level, then, yes, especially for wildlife and action shooters, using DX crop, but not even Nikon is saying anything about action photography.
Hi.

I am currently using Pentax, mostly for landscapes/hiking photos.

The reason I would pick the Z7 is the extra dynamic range but not so much the resolution, I am quite happy with 24MP.
How do you know the Z7 has more DR than the D6? Or are you saying that it has more than the Pentax?
Is there any information about the Z6's sensor and its dynamic range at base ISO, compared to the Z7's base ISO?
I have not seen any such.

Bill Claff has Z7 RN here:


No PDR for either camera yet on Bill's site.

Jim
 
I’ve been planning on purchasing a Z6 once the reviews are out. My reasoning is that I really am fine with 24MP, and that the Z6 should have better low light performance.

But, now I’m wondering if this is the right choice. Other than the 45MP,

is there any other reason I might want a Z7 over a Z6?
7 is a luckier number, it is one more than 6 and you can call it Zed 7 if you like

Same as that amp that goes to 11... better than the ones that only go to 10..

c039d4b863e74ef79b5c61ca458d3544.jpg
 
Last edited:
I never put double the resolution aside. Unless I'm using my cell phone :^)
 
I wonder who, except for landscape photogs, will go for the Z7. If the tracking AF and buffer were at D850 level, then, yes, especially for wildlife and action shooters, using DX crop, but not even Nikon is saying anything about action photography.
Hi.

I am currently using Pentax, mostly for landscapes/hiking photos.

The reason I would pick the Z7 is the extra dynamic range but not so much the resolution, I am quite happy with 24MP.

Is there any information about the Z6's sensor and its dynamic range at base ISO, compared to the Z7's base ISO?

Thank you!
I wouldn't.

If I'm shooting serious landscapes, I have a tripod, and I'll bracket multiple exposures.

Stacking multiple shots will get significantly more dynamic range than any single shot is capable of; and landscape photography is a prime candidate for this, since the scene is still.

In theory, the Z7 may have a higher dynamic range at base ISO just because it drops down to ISO 64--but this also requires a longer exposure. Same thing with bracketing.

Use the e-shutter to avoid any and all vibration caused by the shutter, and you don't even need to worry about aligning the images.
 
It will be interesting to see if high ISO performance on the Z6 is any different to that of the Z7 in practice.

What I mean: with similar sensor technology, one would expect low light noise performance of a 24Mpixel sensor to look better with a 24M pixel image than with a 45Mpixel sensor and a 45Mpixel image. But if you downsize the 45Mpixel to 24Mpixel then the noise may be similar.
If you use linear techniques, and the sensors have the same technology, what you say is true. However, if you use nonlinear noise reduction, you'll get a better downsized image from the higher-res camera.


Jim
 
I never put double the resolution aside. Unless I'm using my cell phone :^)
Uh, about 1.4 times the resolution:


Jim
 
It will be interesting to see if high ISO performance on the Z6 is any different to that of the Z7 in practice.

What I mean: with similar sensor technology, one would expect low light noise performance of a 24Mpixel sensor to look better with a 24M pixel image than with a 45Mpixel sensor and a 45Mpixel image. But if you downsize the 45Mpixel to 24Mpixel then the noise may be similar.
If you use linear techniques, and the sensors have the same technology, what you say is true. However, if you use nonlinear noise reduction, you'll get a better downsized image from the higher-res camera.

https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/noise-reduction-with-nonlinear-tools-and-downsampling/

Jim
Thanks for the correction!

If I understand you correctly, then we might expect better low-light performance from the Z7 than the Z6, despite the nominal higher ISO range of the Z6? I'm assuming comparing like-with-like, that is downscaling a Z7 image to 24Mpixel, and that the two cameras are likely to use similar sensor technology, though that might be wrong.

I await your testing eagerly!
 
It will be interesting to see if high ISO performance on the Z6 is any different to that of the Z7 in practice.

What I mean: with similar sensor technology, one would expect low light noise performance of a 24Mpixel sensor to look better with a 24M pixel image than with a 45Mpixel sensor and a 45Mpixel image. But if you downsize the 45Mpixel to 24Mpixel then the noise may be similar.
If you use linear techniques, and the sensors have the same technology, what you say is true. However, if you use nonlinear noise reduction, you'll get a better downsized image from the higher-res camera.

https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/noise-reduction-with-nonlinear-tools-and-downsampling/

Jim
Thanks for the correction!

If I understand you correctly, then we might expect better low-light performance from the Z7 than the Z6, despite the nominal higher ISO range of the Z6? I'm assuming comparing like-with-like, that is downscaling a Z7 image to 24Mpixel, and that the two cameras are likely to use similar sensor technology, though that might be wrong.
That is what I am saying. Of course, we don't know much about the sensor in the Z6 yet, but if the tech is the same, that's what I expect.
I await your testing eagerly!
So do I!

Jim
 
It will be interesting to see if high ISO performance on the Z6 is any different to that of the Z7 in practice.

What I mean: with similar sensor technology, one would expect low light noise performance of a 24Mpixel sensor to look better with a 24M pixel image than with a 45Mpixel sensor and a 45Mpixel image. But if you downsize the 45Mpixel to 24Mpixel then the noise may be similar.
If you use linear techniques, and the sensors have the same technology, what you say is true. However, if you use nonlinear noise reduction, you'll get a better downsized image from the higher-res camera.

https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/noise-reduction-with-nonlinear-tools-and-downsampling/

Jim
Thanks for the correction!

If I understand you correctly, then we might expect better low-light performance from the Z7 than the Z6, despite the nominal higher ISO range of the Z6? I'm assuming comparing like-with-like, that is downscaling a Z7 image to 24Mpixel, and that the two cameras are likely to use similar sensor technology, though that might be wrong.
That is what I am saying. Of course, we don't know much about the sensor in the Z6 yet, but if the tech is the same, that's what I expect.
I await your testing eagerly!
So do I!

Jim
If that pans out, one of you owes me $1400 to pay the extra for a Z7... ;)
 
Neither camera is cheap. Both cameras look pretty capable. I can see people saying, hell I want that 45mp and I'll pay the extra. Not daft, if that 45mp matters to you. Those are the people the Z7 is aimed at. It's not a D850 replacement as such, but it is likely the first of a line of Z cameras with that sort of resolution.

Me, I've convinced myself the Z6 is the sensible choice. I think. Or is it....? Wait... :-D

Maybe the clincher is that I could always swap it for a Z7 or equivalent later, if I wanted to. I've shoved in a pre-order for the Z6, am interested to see what the real reviews come up with.
 
The obvious answer is... get both. Lol
 
Hi Jim.

Sorry for the late answer. I was indeed referring to Z7 having more DR than Z6. Obviously I do not know if this is the case, it's just a personal assumption based on the reviews of D850.

Thanks for the link, from the graph is looks like the performance is very similar to D850, at least when it comes to read noise.
 
If I'm shooting serious landscapes, I have a tripod, and I'll bracket multiple exposures.

Stacking multiple shots will get significantly more dynamic range than any single shot is capable of; and landscape photography is a prime candidate for this, since the scene is still.
I cannot agree more with this, however, I am not that serious about landscapes. In the sense that the tripod and the time it takes to take a picture following this technique will seriously impact my hike. I shoot handheld.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top