sluggy_warrior
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 3,261
- Solutions
- 6
- Reaction score
- 2,201
I had to do exactly that for my parents-in-law's funerals a few years back. Luckily I shared most of the final exported JPGs on Google Photos, and GPhotos face-recognition is scarily accurate :-(Recently I needed to find pictures of my father to print for his funeral. I have my pictures organized in folders, so I had to search in a lot of folders. If I had put them in a collection or somehow keyworded, it would of been much easier. Same goes for when you need to find any particular picture..... If you organize your photos in folders with some naming convention, the DAM/catalog is usually not needed. But if you tag your photos frequently, assign rating, and/or if you want to search by camera/lens/focal length/aperture/..., a catalog/DAM is very efficient and powerful.
Even with the event description in the folders' name (e.g. "20180827 - karate exam"), it still took 3-4 hours to go through my collection.
But even with DAM/catalog, tagging is still very labor-intensive. Automated tagging still would be best, like how Flickr can add tags automatically: tree, sea, ...
Would be awesome if face-recognition can be used reliably offline to protect privacy. darktable has something in progress, I'm planning to check it out to see how effective it is.
https://github.com/darktable-org/lua-scripts/pull/100/files/024e016df2853c65215d8f517f53b4ce26a49b49
https://github.com/ageitgey/face_recognition
Last edited: