Bejersey
Forum Pro
Rick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
In my 3+ years of owning lx100, I had dust problems after returning from any vacation I took it with me. Turkey, Caribbean, Spain, etc. Turkey I can understand as I went through some dusty terrain. But Spain and Caribbean I didn't visit any dusty places but somehow my camera ended up trapping few specs.
I was always able to easily clean the spots in lightroom. Then used the vacuum with water bottle method found on YouTube and it always worked in cleaning easily. Sensor is spot free and new even now.
No tilting screen or pop-up bounce flash on version 2 means my lx100 v1 is good for many more years. It's a joy to use the camera.
Just vibrate on the dust off. Why you guys freak about this?My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Just vibrate on the dust off. Why you guys freak about this?My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Correct, from what I've read, absolutely NOTHING. And I've read extensively.My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Panasonic will never release such figures, but it's clear to me that they are making a killing in denying warranty claims for sensor dust and charging huge "repair fees" (up to $400 or more, plus shipping paid by the customer!)Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Correct, from what I've read, absolutely NOTHING. And I've read extensively.My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Panasonic will never release such figures, but it's clear to me that they are making a killing in denying warranty claims for sensor dust and charging huge "repair fees" (up to $400 or more, plus shipping paid by the customer!)Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Here is a sample of users' reports:
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Va...unity-reviews&pageNumber=1#reviews-filter-bar
Same problems with the Leica D-lux model BTW.
They just need to say it is dustproof as Canon have done with the G1X III. No need to say anything about the previous model and there is no implication with the Canon that there were problems with the Mk I and II.which they may have...they would never state that for the record or as a "fix" because then they are admitting that there was a problem.
True! Environmentally SealedThey just need to say it is dustproof as Canon have done with the G1X III. No need to say anything about the previous model and there is no implication with the Canon that there were problems with the Mk I and II.which they may have...they would never state that for the record or as a "fix" because then they are admitting that there was a problem.
Well I'm sure Panasonic would take care of any dust problems, on the sensor or in the lens, while the camera is under warranty and with Panasonic's extended 3-year warranty a person would have at least 3 years of worry free use.Correct, from what I've read, absolutely NOTHING. And I've read extensively.My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Panasonic will never release such figures, but it's clear to me that they are making a killing in denying warranty claims for sensor dust and charging huge "repair fees" (up to $400 or more, plus shipping paid by the customer!)Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Here is a sample of users' reports:
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Va...unity-reviews&pageNumber=1#reviews-filter-bar
Same problems with the Leica D-lux model BTW.
I can understand how you feel and I wouldn't want a camera that's a dust magnet either but there are a lot of people who say they've never had a problem with their LX100 cameras.I've waited a long time for this camera, but with no mention of 'environmentally sealed' or such like, there remains the nagging doubt that it may suffer from the same dust problems, which I believe are real. The old saying 'Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me' springs to mind, unfortunately.
While I agree that publicity may contribute to the perception of a problem -- really, to how widespread or frustrating the problem may be -- I wouldn't agree that a 3-year warranty means that you can use the camera "worry free."Well I'm sure Panasonic would take care of any dust problems, on the sensor or in the lens, while the camera is under warranty and with Panasonic's extended 3-year warranty a person would have at least 3 years of worry free use.Correct, from what I've read, absolutely NOTHING. And I've read extensively.My question too. It looks to me as if they have not changed anything to prevent dust from getting on the sensor.
Panasonic will never release such figures, but it's clear to me that they are making a killing in denying warranty claims for sensor dust and charging huge "repair fees" (up to $400 or more, plus shipping paid by the customer!)Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of, say, one year and older, LX100's had dust on the sensor? I feel that a lot didn't because many people say how happy they are with the camera but a fair number, a significant number say that in 6 or 12 months, the dust on the sensor kind of ruined the LX100 for them. I'm sure it ruined the resale of the camera too.
Cathy H.
Here is a sample of users' reports:
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Va...unity-reviews&pageNumber=1#reviews-filter-bar
Same problems with the Leica D-lux model BTW.
I've often wondered why (or if) this camera is worse than any other fixed zoom lens cameras.
Sometimes I think it may just get more publicity than other cameras.
As long as it can survive the review period there will never be a problem.I haven't seen a single report of dust on the LX100 MKII sensor.
Just maybe they took some notice.No word from Panasonic, so I assume they did nothing about it.
This problem could be easily mitigated with firmware by reducing the frequent and unnecessary lens extensions the original LX100 suffers from. For instance, even to just view some pictures the lens extends.
It is simply physics, as the lens extends (any lens for that matter), it sucks air in and with it dust.