cameras will be more computational than ever before, i guess the biggest change or innovation would be a global shutter in a stills orientated camera, then manufacturers could slug it out making the best fake shutter sound for the reviewers
It makes sense for sure. I wonder if it will be a ..... "click" or a "clunk" .... maybe a "click bzzz clunk"
i have to agree, i am happy with my clunkers, they work and i can get shots i like, the opportunity to get those shots sometimes seems very limited though. What does interest me though is that new Nikon 500mm smaller fresnel design being developed, but then i have to buy a new body, software for the body.....faster computer....better memory cards....more storage...... think i'll go on holiday insteadIt makes sense for sure. I wonder if it will be a ..... "click" or a "clunk" .... maybe a "click bzzz clunk"
We've had it in here before with people asking how to turn the shutter sound off ! Had it in the Sony forum as well.
It's come to a stage where I honestly can't see a reason to do a so called upgrade and besides, I couldn't afford it all the time like some do in here. Eye watering prices and also eye watering wallets some have
You have to go a long way to find a bad camera, but not too far to find a bad photographer now days Wu.
All the best.
Danny.
Not invented by olympus and gimmick for 99.9% of users.
i will give you that the Oly E330 was very innovative and really started the move towards mirrorless, a great piece of technology that
So which company had sensor-based image stabilization first?
in a Dslr i believe it was Minolta
There was an electronic technique to steady images, but I'm not sure "anti-shake" was the same as sensor-based image stabilization. Maybe it was?
well it moved the sensor to compensate for camera movements.....so...you know
DO NOT read this forum if you have any weak mind. Because these people here WILL POISON your mind about inferior complex that is very widely here.
That is called Exposure Bracketing. 3 stops down, one metered zero, 3 stops over. You can as well do it as correctly exposed and then 5-7 stops down.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/konicaminolta7d
Not exactly, as larger you go then less resolution you need, as the viewing distance gets longer as well.
I am sorry but you are doing a common mistake. The earliest patent that I found about Olympus sensor stabilization is from 1992, and the Minolta is later.
The older CCD sensors were efectively global shutter cameras. The Nikon d70 was one of them. Had a lovely fast flash synch speed as a result,
An inferior implementation, probably not even based on the same process. Much like sensor cleaning before ultrasonic took hold.
