ClaudeVoyage
Well-known member
I have replaced Lightroom by ACDSee because i don't like what the future of Lightroom semms to be (photos in the cloud as the renaming suggest).
I didn't want a non desctructive editor anymore where i have to export my photos to keep the adjustments.
I switch one time from Lightroom 2 to Aperture 3, and then to Aperture to Lightroom. In the mean time, i switch to Windows. At each time, i have to export all my developped photos to keep my adjustements. I didn't want to do that anymore with any new software.
I like that when you use develop in ACDSee, it create a image file and keep the original in a specific folder. You have the best of the too worlds, it automatically create a export of your file and you keep the possibility to modify your adjustements.
With the Edit mode, you have a editor with layers, it is not as advanced as photoshop or Affinity Photo. But i find that it has the essential tools for photographers. It is not bloated by all the tools for illustrators or graphical designers. It is an advantage for me.
I use it in conjonction with DXO PhotoLabs, because i find the automated adjustements really good and a major time savor. With ACDSee, you can specify to not display the sidecar of dxo but when you move a photo, it move the sidecar too.
You don't have to import your photos, it scans the folder as you view it and it is very fast. I hated Lightroom for that. I didn't use the collections in LR but the folders. So i have the same thing in ACDSee but much faster. I see imediately the photos created by DXO Photolabs (no need to import). Moving photos in another folder is very fast too.
You can do search with multiple criterias, but it is less intuitive than LR.
It managed IPTC very well. It modify instantly the jpeg file or sidecar, not need to ask for each files to save the IPTC. Having ACDSee fields are handy for cataloging video files. The renaming fonctions are very good too...
I geotag my images and ACDSee was one of the few that permit to do that. I miss that you can't import a GPS file.
The only thing that i miss is the stack of images in managed mode of LR. I wish it can stack photos taken in a interval of time. But you can use Zip files in the manager to for that.
Overall, after one year of use, i don't miss LR and ACDSee Ultimate is a very complete program and highly customisable. I think it is an underestimated software.
I didn't want a non desctructive editor anymore where i have to export my photos to keep the adjustments.
I switch one time from Lightroom 2 to Aperture 3, and then to Aperture to Lightroom. In the mean time, i switch to Windows. At each time, i have to export all my developped photos to keep my adjustements. I didn't want to do that anymore with any new software.
I like that when you use develop in ACDSee, it create a image file and keep the original in a specific folder. You have the best of the too worlds, it automatically create a export of your file and you keep the possibility to modify your adjustements.
With the Edit mode, you have a editor with layers, it is not as advanced as photoshop or Affinity Photo. But i find that it has the essential tools for photographers. It is not bloated by all the tools for illustrators or graphical designers. It is an advantage for me.
I use it in conjonction with DXO PhotoLabs, because i find the automated adjustements really good and a major time savor. With ACDSee, you can specify to not display the sidecar of dxo but when you move a photo, it move the sidecar too.
You don't have to import your photos, it scans the folder as you view it and it is very fast. I hated Lightroom for that. I didn't use the collections in LR but the folders. So i have the same thing in ACDSee but much faster. I see imediately the photos created by DXO Photolabs (no need to import). Moving photos in another folder is very fast too.
You can do search with multiple criterias, but it is less intuitive than LR.
It managed IPTC very well. It modify instantly the jpeg file or sidecar, not need to ask for each files to save the IPTC. Having ACDSee fields are handy for cataloging video files. The renaming fonctions are very good too...
I geotag my images and ACDSee was one of the few that permit to do that. I miss that you can't import a GPS file.
The only thing that i miss is the stack of images in managed mode of LR. I wish it can stack photos taken in a interval of time. But you can use Zip files in the manager to for that.
Overall, after one year of use, i don't miss LR and ACDSee Ultimate is a very complete program and highly customisable. I think it is an underestimated software.

