Flash to keep / one to sell SB800 or SB910

I bought them after being huckstered by one of his youtube vids where he was taking 'studio' portraits in an office and in a normal room. Using a couple of guns- one with a colour ball lighting the background, and onother lighting the person.

Those balls fire light in all directions and need a lot of space between the subject and any walls to make sense- otherwise the light they give off is just always the light that is reflected off the walls and ceiling.

Thats fine if thats what you want, but i didnt have to pay gary fong 50 dollars to do bounce flash.
Thanks. I never buy this stuff. Sometimes when I buy a package of gear, fellows are still finding all these little extras to give me as I'm walking out the door. Tripods, filters, umbrellas, Gary Fong thingys.

This particular package I would have paid the same price without the tripod, monopod, remote release, Lumiquest softbox thingy. Some people just want it all gone.
This works as good as the Fong spheres:


Plastic drinking cup mounted as a diffuser on a Nikon SB-800

I believe the main difference between the 800 and 900 was that the 900 had a overheat protection built-in which engaged very soon to the dismay of many wedding shooters. Then they did the same as with the D800->D810 and D600->D610 and created the D910 which, IIRC, has a tiny fan build in to cool the flash tube.

Anyway many flash shooters, including me (although I never used the SB-9xx), swear by the SB-800 so my advice would be to keep that one with the 5th battery option. Even more so taking your earlier replies into account (repair cost, revenue when selling).

Another important fact with second hand flashes is the age (times fired, flash strength) of the tiny flash tube. Ageing tubes tend to emit bluer light and have longer flash duration with the same output level. I have a meter which measures those values, but that won't do you much good of course. You can take identical test shots with both units and see if one is definitely bluer than the other. Although this difference can have several causes it's an indication of an ageing flash tube.

Hope this helps.
Thanks. Good information.

I think the SB800 was bought together by the original owner, and the body was a low shutter count, so that one didn't have much use. The SB910 was bought with a 3 year old D810 with only 5000 shots, and the lady had only purchased the flash in the last few months. So hardly any shots on that.

--
A Canon G5 and a bit of Nikon gear.
---------------------------
He could be right, he could be wrong. I think he’s wrong but he says it in such a sincere way. You have to think he thinks he’s right. - Bob Dylan
 
I use SB800, SB900 and SB910 all together with Pocket Wizards. There are distinct advantages to the 9xx series.

First, the controls are much simpler and easier to use. I appreciate that.

Second, the recycle time is a lot faster with the 9xx, even compared to having 5 batteries in the SB800.

Third, there is less chance burning out the 9xx strobes as they have a thermal cutoff circuit. Not that I ever burned up an SB800, but I've heard the stories.

The 910 seems to have better cooling than the 900, so it doesn't cut off in the middle of a wedding shoot. (My 900 never did, but I worried about it, so I never used it as the main light).

The 910 has better zooming capabilities than the 800, and I beleive it zooms differently on DX and FX cameras, taking crop factor into account. Comes with better gel filters too.
 
Try using off-camera flash, before selling. It is, really, so very much fun. :-)
 
SB800: robust, but with no overheat circuitry could be burned out with continuous firing.

SB900: Overly-sensitive overheat circuitry gave this version a very bad reputation among wedding shooters as the flash would shut down for a couple of minutes in the middle of a job. In it's defense there, it was both more powerful than the 800 AND recycled quicker, so it could get in trouble faster. But many people (myself included, though I never shoot weddings) turned off the overheat protection and had no problems with overheating.

SB910: A 900 without the overheating issue, and a different style of carrying case. I assumed it added some minor cooling feature, and/or reprogrammed the sensor to not go off so easily.
 
If so, keep both. You always want a back up for paid work.
+1

I bought a SB900 back in 2008 when they first came out. This was before the heating shutoff was known wide spread. It cut out on me while I was shooting the bride's preparation. Fortunately I had my SB800 with me. I continued with the SB900 after it cooled and kept an eye on the thermal indicator. It didn't give me any problems for the rest of the wedding. The key is always have a backup.
 
If so, keep both. You always want a back up for paid work.
I agree. Not paid work in my case, or even "must have" shots for anyone for free. I've got my Iphone for those. :)
 
I have two SB800s and one SB900. If I’m doing a two light setup I tend to use the 800s since they provide the same lighting pattern. If I had to sell one it’d be the 900. I love the 800s.
 
Thanks. I never buy this stuff. Sometimes when I buy a package of gear, fellows are still finding all these little extras to give me as I'm walking out the door. Tripods, filters, umbrellas, Gary Fong thingys.

This particular package I would have paid the same price without the tripod, monopod, remote release, Lumiquest softbox thingy. Some people just want it all gone.
Regarding the Lumiquest softbox thingy. . . If it's an UltraSoft, it's a keeper as far as I am concerned. I've used one since the 90s on my Nikon flashes and a Metz potato masher. It folds into a very portable size and you can get optional silver and gold mylar inserts that up the power output (as much as 1.5 stops with the silver) while changing the quality of the light. I usually keep the silver inserts installed for general use.

For the camera pop-up flash, I use a translucent Fuji film canister. I cut it around 50% up each side and it fits securely on the flash. It does a nice job of slightly softening the tiny strobe. You can slip a Rosco filter inside it. . .

I've been doing location photography for many years using lots of nice lighting gear. Those two cheap devices have been in my bag pretty much the entire time.
 
Craig,

Thanks for the input!

Sam
 
Thanks. I never buy this stuff. Sometimes when I buy a package of gear, fellows are still finding all these little extras to give me as I'm walking out the door. Tripods, filters, umbrellas, Gary Fong thingys.

This particular package I would have paid the same price without the tripod, monopod, remote release, Lumiquest softbox thingy. Some people just want it all gone.
Regarding the Lumiquest softbox thingy. . . If it's an UltraSoft, it's a keeper as far as I am concerned. I've used one since the 90s on my Nikon flashes and a Metz potato masher. It folds into a very portable size and you can get optional silver and gold mylar inserts that up the power output (as much as 1.5 stops with the silver) while changing the quality of the light. I usually keep the silver inserts installed for general use.

For the camera pop-up flash, I use a translucent Fuji film canister. I cut it around 50% up each side and it fits securely on the flash. It does a nice job of slightly softening the tiny strobe. You can slip a Rosco filter inside it. . .

I've been doing location photography for many years using lots of nice lighting gear. Those two cheap devices have been in my bag pretty much the entire time.
It's a Lumiquest Softbox LTp. Looks like the designer had a bunch of binders around and figured he / she could make something out of them.

Good idea on the pop up flash diffuser. Funny, but I woke up one morning and no longer had a pop up flash. I had the D4 then D4s which didn't have one, swapped my D750 for a D500 and another one gone, and I forgot that one of the reasons I liked the D810 over the 850 was that I'd have one body with a pop up flash. But one day I decided that I had enough of the D810 not being good enough of a match with the D4s AF wise and fps wise, throw in around a 10% dealer discount on a new 850, and I ended up with three bodies without a pop up flash.
 
Thanks. I never buy this stuff. Sometimes when I buy a package of gear, fellows are still finding all these little extras to give me as I'm walking out the door. Tripods, filters, umbrellas, Gary Fong thingys.

This particular package I would have paid the same price without the tripod, monopod, remote release, Lumiquest softbox thingy. Some people just want it all gone.
Regarding the Lumiquest softbox thingy. . . If it's an UltraSoft, it's a keeper as far as I am concerned. I've used one since the 90s on my Nikon flashes and a Metz potato masher. It folds into a very portable size and you can get optional silver and gold mylar inserts that up the power output (as much as 1.5 stops with the silver) while changing the quality of the light. I usually keep the silver inserts installed for general use.

For the camera pop-up flash, I use a translucent Fuji film canister. I cut it around 50% up each side and it fits securely on the flash. It does a nice job of slightly softening the tiny strobe. You can slip a Rosco filter inside it. . .

I've been doing location photography for many years using lots of nice lighting gear. Those two cheap devices have been in my bag pretty much the entire time.
It's a Lumiquest Softbox LTp. Looks like the designer had a bunch of binders around and figured he / she could make something out of them.

Good idea on the pop up flash diffuser. Funny, but I woke up one morning and no longer had a pop up flash. I had the D4 then D4s which didn't have one, swapped my D750 for a D500 and another one gone, and I forgot that one of the reasons I liked the D810 over the 850 was that I'd have one body with a pop up flash. But one day I decided that I had enough of the D810 not being good enough of a match with the D4s AF wise and fps wise, throw in around a 10% dealer discount on a new 850, and I ended up with three bodies without a pop up flash.
Oh My. . . I just looked up the LTP. That isn't anything that I would be interested in either.

I hardly ever use the pop-up flash but it's great to have it when I don't have a flash available. Even with its limitations (like my 12-24 zoom casting a shadow at any focal length wider than 18mm. . .) it's one of my face DSLR features. But like you I could probably live without it. I mainly use it for fill-flash.
 
You've had suggestions for

Option A - keep the SB800

Option B - keep the SB910

Option C - keep both

Here's a better option than all those by a country mile

Option D - sell both, buy a Godox Ving V850II Li-ion flash and a transmitter. Get 650 full power flashes and reliable off-camera radio operation, and probably end up slightly ahead in cash.
 
You've gotten lots of good replies. All I can add is that when I am shooting with the flash on camera, I appreciate the smaller size of my SB700. When I'm shooting off-camera, I like the higher power of the SB910.

If I were you, I would keep both, for flexibility and backup. Even if you only use flash occasionally, when you need it, there aren't a lot of alternatives if the flash stops working.
 
Try using off-camera flash, before selling. It is, really, so very much fun. :-)
Do you mean the 910 would be better than the 800 for that? I've used the pop up as commander ( when I had a pop up ), but I also have remote cords and a couple of different remote triggers.
I do not see either one as “better” for off-camera flash, except that the 910 has a more user-friendly control interface, in my opinion. Depending upon the situaton, two or three remote flashes can be nice to have. Plus, a Speedlight in the hot shoe can direct the beam where a pop-up flash cannot, whether that beam is providing significant light, or instructing the remote flash.
 
Another reason to have more than one Speedlight, is overheating when shooting something like a wedding or an event. Even if one is not a working professional, the occasional event may need to be photographed.

My evidentiary/forensic/crime-scene shooting rarely had to be done at blazing speed, for an extended time, and I never reached the point of a flash protecting itself by shutting-down, but I always kept three Speedlites in the case, and sometimes did rotate two of them, when shooting quickly, performing a switch at natural pauses. (When colleagues are risking their safety, and that of the public, by keeping a major roadway closed, time is of the essence.)
 
Another reason to have more than one Speedlight, is overheating when shooting something like a wedding or an event. Even if one is not a working professional, the occasional event may need to be photographed.
That's a "never" for me. Weddings, events, all too peopley for me. :)
My evidentiary/forensic/crime-scene shooting rarely had to be done at blazing speed, for an extended time, and I never reached the point of a flash protecting itself by shutting-down, but I always kept three Speedlites in the case, and sometimes did rotate two of them, when shooting quickly, performing a switch at natural pauses. (When colleagues are risking their safety, and that of the public, by keeping a major roadway closed, time is of the essence.)
 
I currently have sb600, sb800, and sb910. I would keep the 910 just for the better interface.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top