Sony noob on wedding

HozicEmir

Leading Member
Messages
769
Reaction score
151
Location
BiH, BA
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family. Also I'm long time Pentax user but just got one A7s to be able to shoot some run and gun videos and adapt manual lenses. Only Af lens that I have is 24-240 and all images are made with that lens. So this is how A7s performed and I somehow managed to get , in my opinion , decent results.



adc8c10d9fb24cfdb8c6c9858869f4d7.jpg



8b9cb2c946b4485eb2b69e6d7a02aaf9.jpg



7a094170e70849b990450a26a0ff9bab.jpg



ae893e86b0ec483f90f80a0d590fea78.jpg



c93bc13cf80b43968c183cd8348e7098.jpg



9dc50b4a70374f36aec4ddba0fece67f.jpg



7ef446bcf5b44c11a5422fcedcc3fe07.jpg



9dc92dc1063a4eacb7ae01a620ab091f.jpg



95b496122a514434aede465f3aa86554.jpg



84a7c103555244fbaf84dfa8f47f3d61.jpg



2b1f48483cde48fc8d7f9c40983a4198.jpg



6998e55367c24336b708aaec39bbbfea.jpg



--
My country, my river, www.sana.ba
 
Was your lens stuck at f/6.3? If not, why did you not use any different aperture? Especially wider aperture?
 
Was your lens stuck at f/6.3? If not, why did you not use any different aperture? Especially wider aperture?
Yes, would have liked less dof, the background is distracting.
 
Noob and wedding.

:)
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
 
Last edited:
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
Haha... yes. I was asked to do a wedding by a friend, turned it down. after seeing the pictures they had done, I wished I had done it (I could've done better). Of course, I only feel that way with hindsight, so it wouldn't have mattered.
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
Haha... yes. I was asked to do a wedding by a friend, turned it down. after seeing the pictures they had done, I wished I had done it (I could've done better). Of course, I only feel that way with hindsight, so it wouldn't have mattered.
Ha, yes wedding couple can always ask someome even worse if I declined. But to be honest I don’t understand people who refuse to hire a good professional for wedding. It’s not like you get married in every other year(hopefully). For some people it’s once in a lifetime experience and wedding photographs should reflect that in a best possible way.
 
You gain experience by shooting weddings. Start as a second, or if the couple cannot afford an experienced photog, then do it for free, as long as they understand you are not a pro.
 
Tnx all for comments, even for jokes on my account :) . It was experience for me, and I didin't steel anyone job :) I was asked to do this no mater what.

believe me or not , bride and groom are more than satisfied with outcome
 
Your pics are not bad for the first time!

The 1st and 2nd indoor shots look fine, the 3rd requires a more careful editing. She has some light halo left of her face, I guess you lighten up her face and the brush was a bit too much around (same with other shots, e.g. the American portrait of him). I also would edit the ugly part on the wall.

For the outdoor shots, I would have been looking for a better location. The river, the bridge, the houses are simply ugly. Yes, a fast portrait lens would have helped to blur the background, but a better location would look better in any way.

In general, the mid constrast look to high/harsh for me, so their skin tones are not that smooth.

Hope that helps!

--
M.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.flickr.com/people/126876759@N02/
 
Last edited:
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
Sorry but it’s not.

OP didn’t indicate that he was interested in wedding photography. OP didn’t indicate that he wanted to start a career as a wedding photographer. According to his story he was just a relative with a camera and was “forced” to do the job.

It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
 
Last edited:
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
Sorry but it’s not.

OP didn’t indicate that he was interested in wedding photography. OP didn’t indicate that he wanted to start a career as a wedding photographer. According to his story he was just a relative with a camera and was “forced” to do the job.

It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
Have also photographed quite a few weddings for free - for family and friends - they were all very happy with the outcome (have been into the photo buisiness years ago). Absolutely no regret for not saying no and giving a professional a job opportunity...

The photos from the actual wedding discussed here could have been better - or worse - but the main thing is that the marked couple seems to be satisfied with the job done...

The OP seems to be a reasonable man, showing his work and listening to the comments given - that is a good sign for better future images! ;-)

We all had to start somewhere, some seems to forget that...
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
Sorry but it’s not.

OP didn’t indicate that he was interested in wedding photography. OP didn’t indicate that he wanted to start a career as a wedding photographer. According to his story he was just a relative with a camera and was “forced” to do the job.

It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
Have also photographed quite a few weddings for free - for family and friends - they were all very happy with the outcome (have been into the photo buisiness years ago). Absolutely no regret for not saying no and giving a professional a job opportunity...

The photos from the actual wedding discussed here could have been better - or worse - but the main thing is that the marked couple seems to be satisfied with the job done...

The OP seems to be a reasonable man, showing his work and listening to the comments given - that is a good sign for better future images! ;-)

We all had to start somewhere, some seems to forget that...
Again the OP didn’t say that he wanted to start a career, so that’s a silly argument.

I also think it’s a problem if wedding couple and people in general grow to accept amateurish quality. It devalues the profession.
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
If he didn't want to do it then he should have just said no, thats something I agree with but often interpersonal relationships can often make things difficult if not near impossible.

One thing to remember though not everyone can afford professional wedding photography or may simply not want a professional photographer at their wedding. If one is willing and wants to take the photos then why not.

Some couples actually like the photos their family and friends take for them at their wedding, some feel it is more intimate, more personal or more natural.

When your friends ask for a lift to you decline and tell them to take a taxi because you don't want to steal from taxi drivers.

You could make that argument about everything you ever do. Don't bother inviting friends around for a home cooked meal because it's stealing from restaurants. Don't make a birthday cake, don't help someone move house, don't help someone paint their fence.
 
It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
The pro have to convince by quality (and most do so), not by someone‘s rules. I am a quite experienced woodworker who has built his complete kitchen on his own - was what wrong because I didn‘t get a pro?
 
Last edited:
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
If he didn't want to do it then he should have just said no, thats something I agree with but often interpersonal relationships can often make things difficult if not near impossible.

One thing to remember though not everyone can afford professional wedding photography or may simply not want a professional photographer at their wedding. If one is willing and wants to take the photos then why not.

Some couples actually like the photos their family and friends take for them at their wedding, some feel it is more intimate, more personal or more natural.

When your friends ask for a lift to you decline and tell them to take a taxi because you don't want to steal from taxi drivers.

You could make that argument about everything you ever do. Don't bother inviting friends around for a home cooked meal because it's stealing from restaurants. Don't make a birthday cake, don't help someone move house, don't help someone paint their fence.
If someone thinks they can’t afford a professional wedding photographer, they haven’t realized how much it could cost if they hire an amateur. What if the equipment fail during the day? Almost none of the amateurs have backup, because they haven’t done the investment for backup gear.

Does the amateur have suitable equipment for the wedding on the first place? OP had a lens that no professional would use in the wedding. Does the amateur have a backup for the photos if the computer breaks during the postproduction? Even if we exclude all the missed shots the amateur is prone to make there are so many things that could go wrong, that it’s always a huge risk to use the amateur. There is no plan-B if sh•t hits the fan.
 
Last edited:
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
Sorry but it’s not.

OP didn’t indicate that he was interested in wedding photography. OP didn’t indicate that he wanted to start a career as a wedding photographer. According to his story he was just a relative with a camera and was “forced” to do the job.

It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
Have also photographed quite a few weddings for free - for family and friends - they were all very happy with the outcome (have been into the photo buisiness years ago). Absolutely no regret for not saying no and giving a professional a job opportunity...

The photos from the actual wedding discussed here could have been better - or worse - but the main thing is that the marked couple seems to be satisfied with the job done...

The OP seems to be a reasonable man, showing his work and listening to the comments given - that is a good sign for better future images! ;-)

We all had to start somewhere, some seems to forget that...
Again the OP didn’t say that he wanted to start a career, so that’s a silly argument.

I also think it’s a problem if wedding couple and people in general grow to accept amateurish quality. It devalues the profession.
Well if you are a seasonal pro wedding photographer that can just about do as good as the op why should I hire you?
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
If he didn't want to do it then he should have just said no, thats something I agree with but often interpersonal relationships can often make things difficult if not near impossible.

One thing to remember though not everyone can afford professional wedding photography or may simply not want a professional photographer at their wedding. If one is willing and wants to take the photos then why not.

Some couples actually like the photos their family and friends take for them at their wedding, some feel it is more intimate, more personal or more natural.

When your friends ask for a lift to you decline and tell them to take a taxi because you don't want to steal from taxi drivers.

You could make that argument about everything you ever do. Don't bother inviting friends around for a home cooked meal because it's stealing from restaurants. Don't make a birthday cake, don't help someone move house, don't help someone paint their fence.
If someone thinks they can’t afford a professional wedding photographer, they haven’t realized how much it could cost if they hire an amateur. What if the equipment fail during the day? Almost none of the amateurs have backup, because they haven’t done the investment for backup gear.

Does the amateur have suitable equipment for the wedding on the first place? OP had a lens that no professional would use in the wedding. Does the amateur have a backup for the photos if the computer breaks during the postproduction? Even if we exclude all the missed shots the amateur is prone to make there are so many things that could go wrong, that it’s always a huge risk to use the amateur. There is no plan-B if sh•t hits the fan.
They are not hiring an amateur they are often asking a friend to help them out. It costs them nothing if the camera fails it cost them nothing if the photos are bad. Most mature adults actually realise this and most are grateful that the friend is will to do this for them. There is no need for a plan B as most understand and realise this.

Again do you refuse to do favours for friends, refuse to help people because something may go wrong. I guess you never give friends lift or help them move or anything like that.

There is a risk with everything you do in life ,in the great scheme of things that may go wrong taking photographs at a wedding for friends is pretty safe.
 
I'm new to Sony and also never did wedding before. Last week I was forced to make couple shots on wedding because some personal relations with groom's family.
No offense, but unless someone was actually pointing a gun on you, you should have declined politely. You enforced the idea that people don’t need to hire a professional nowdays , because there is always some relative with an expensive camera. Professional wedding photographer would have made a much better job and you didn’t have to waste your time.

I have been actually asked the same thing you was “forced”, but I have declined and I always will. I’m not a professional wedding photographer and I don’t want to steal money from a real professional by doing their job for free/half free. Two important reasons to say no.
sorry but thats a load of rubbish.

If the OP wants to get into wedding photography then this is one way of gaining experience ie do it for peanuts.

Those so called proffessionals had to start from somewhere too you know
Sorry but it’s not.

OP didn’t indicate that he was interested in wedding photography. OP didn’t indicate that he wanted to start a career as a wedding photographer. According to his story he was just a relative with a camera and was “forced” to do the job.

It’s a problem for the whole industry if free amateurs do something that should be done by professionals.
Have also photographed quite a few weddings for free - for family and friends - they were all very happy with the outcome (have been into the photo buisiness years ago). Absolutely no regret for not saying no and giving a professional a job opportunity...

The photos from the actual wedding discussed here could have been better - or worse - but the main thing is that the marked couple seems to be satisfied with the job done...

The OP seems to be a reasonable man, showing his work and listening to the comments given - that is a good sign for better future images! ;-)

We all had to start somewhere, some seems to forget that...
Again the OP didn’t say that he wanted to start a career, so that’s a silly argument.
Really. We all have to start somewhere.

Did not mention starting a career, even amateurs have to start somewhere...
I also think it’s a problem if wedding couple and people in general grow to accept amateurish quality. It devalues the profession.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top