5.0 out of 5 starsGreat balance of compactness and capability that is a complete joy to use.

slartz

Senior Member
Messages
2,103
Reaction score
2,199
Location
Tel Aviv, IL
Background
Bought the GX9 as an upgrade from my GX85, serving as my secondary (smaller) m43 body alongside the G9. I use my smaller body whenever I travel for business and want a small camera with me, or go out in the evening, and don't want to lug the heavier bodied G9, although the GX9 can easily be a "Main" camera as well.

General Overview
Like the GX85 (and not quite like the GX8), the GX9 is delivering a fantastic combination of being very compact yet extremely featurefull. Moreover, the rangefinder form factors allows this camera to remain fairly small, while retaining a reasonably sized grip. Before this camera I tried other cameras as my secondary body (such as the Olympus EPL7 as well as the EM10), and found them too small to hold comfortably, esp with somewhat larger lenses. The EPL line also suffers from very cluttered controls. The GX9, despite its fairly small size, is surprisingly comfortable. Ergonomics is great, the dual (or triple) dials are comfortable to operate, and while I mainly use it with my smaller lenses, putting larger lenses on it (even the 100-400) proves to be surprisingly comfortable.

The Good
The GX9 has more considerably more good than bad. Some of the highlights of what I love about it include:

* Size and form factor (see above)
* Ergonomics and control
* UI - The GX9, like all other Panasonics, has extremely comfortable user interface. It is fast (even more so on the GX9), intuitive, and very pleasing on the eyes. Panasonic produce the most enjoyable cameras to use, in my eyes.
* Focus - the single focus on this camera is absolutely spectacular. It may be infinitely slower than my G9, but it is still faster than most other cameras. Using the right lens, you will not feel any delay when focusing. Continuous AF is OK, even if not as spectacular as on my G9. But for this price range and casual photography it does fine.
* Image Quality - This is the first camera in the market today that is not a high end flagship model, that uses the new 20MP sensor. This is a great step forward and offers fantastic image quality, like my G9.
* Image Stabilization - While not as top notch as the G9, the GX9 offers 4 stops IBIS as well as Dual IS for better stabilization with panasonic lenses. It works well and makes for great longer exposures.
* Build quality - while it's not weather sealed (unfortunately) - it feels very very solid in the hand.
* Connectivity - This camera has low power bluetooth to keep it always connected to your phone. This allows for real-time geotagging which is VERY convenient when traveling. It also makes connecting wifi and transferring images a breeze.
* USB Charging - This camera allows you to charge it via a standard micro usb cable (rather than having to take the battery out). This makes it great for travel. You can always charge it from a power bank and don't need to carry extra chargers.
* Feature Set - This is just an incredible camera. While I don't shoot a lot of video - it has a plethora of video features, including 4K, as well as plenty of other photography features. In fact, other cameras in these price ranges do not usually offer even half of the capabilities of this one.
* Flash - the built in flash is pretty nice and can be tilted upwards. It also can control other flashes as a master without requiring an additional unit. Nice.
* Tilt Screen - Great and fast operating. Perfect for a stills travel/street camera!

The Bad
While there isn't a lot of real cons to this camera, there are a few small things where it could be better:
* EVF - The biggest disappointment with this camera was the lack of upgrade of the EVF. While it is not bad, per se, it could be better. The 16:9 EVF format is a complete waste of space for a stills oriented camera, and leads to smaller than standard image. Moreover, there is virtually no eye cup, which makes shooting it in strong light environments (like direct sun) a little difficult. Panasonic now offers an option eye cup - I have not had the chance to use it yet... it may offer an improvement. The added tiltable capability is nice, but does not really change a lot.

* Battery Life - Could be better. USB Charging makes up for it to some degree, but it is still a fairly small battery. Luckily you can get two extra (3rd party) batteries and another charger for 20$ on Amazon.

& The Ugly
* The "12-60 Kit Only" option is quite annoying. The 12-60/3,.5-5,6 is a decent lens, but it's not tiny. I bought my older GX85 with the 12-32 which I find is a much better fit for this camera. I also already own the higher end PL12-60/2.8-4 and so I had no use for this, yet I was forced to buy it with it. I ended up selling the GX85 as well as the 12-60, so it worked out, but I would really like to see this camera without it.

* The dedicated exposure compensation dial is a nice gimmik, but ends up not being comfortable for two reasons:
- It is harder to rotate than the rear dial, so it ends up being easier to set the rear dial to exp comp and use that instead.
- If you choose to use the dedicated exp comp dial, the rear dial becomes useless. It would be nice if you could assign it to ISO or something else with no additional press of a button.

Compared to the GX85
For those comparing it to the GX85 (either upgrading or just looking to save some money) - here are key differentiators:
* New 20MP Sensor in the GX9. Slightly more detail and about 1 stop of improved DR (esp. in the highlights)
* Dedicated AFS/AFC/MF lever not present in the GX85
* Newer Venus 9 image processing providing better OOC JPEGs
* Newest Panasonic menu system - giving identical interface as the G9, including the "My Menu" option
* Generally snappier operation
* Better connectivity with low power bluetooth (love it!)
* Tiltable EVF (it's ok, but not a big advantage)
* Dedicated Exposure Compensation Dial (quite disappointing... read above)

Summary
The GX9 offers an incredibly compact and versatile package, with great sensor and image quality, very good image stabilization, and absolutely wonderful handling and ergonomics that make it a joy to to use. Its main downside is its EVF, which while not bad, is not up to industry standards in 2018. Nonetheless, it is the perfect smaller camera and it is highly recommended.Edit
 
Last edited:
You give it "mediocre" for action and sports.

What did you try it on and do you have any results we could look at and compared to what ??

What lenses did you try for action and sports shots??
The CAF is not great. Of course I'm very picky.... but after you are used to things like EM1.2 or G9 (or Canon 7D), the CAF on the GX9 is just OK, no more. For casual stuff it's fine, but for proper action and sports its just not that.

Doesn't matter which lens (well - it will be worse with lenses that do not have DFD, but still).

Besides, in today's day and age - 6fps for sports and action is not very good :)
 
Last edited:
You give it "mediocre" for action and sports.

What did you try it on and do you have any results we could look at and compared to what ??

What lenses did you try for action and sports shots??
The CAF is not great. Of course I'm very picky.... but after you are used to things like EM1.2 or G9 (or Canon 7D), the CAF on the GX9 is just OK, no more. For casual stuff it's fine, but for proper action and sports its just not that.

Doesn't matter which lens (well - it will be worse with lenses that do not have DFD, but still).

Besides, in today's day and age - 6fps for sports and action is not very good :)
I mainly use 5 FPS mainly, so I guess I'm not very good then.

It actually sounds like you didn't test it for action and yes, the lenses do matter for action and sports, but you scored it anyway.

All the best.

Danny.

--
Worry about the image that comes out of the box rather than the box itself
-----------
Birds and BIF's ..... https://www.flickr.com/photos/124733969@N06/sets/
The need for speed ..... https://www.flickr.com/photos/130646821@N03/albums
 
Last edited:
Thank you for extensive review.. GX9's recent firmware updated adds CineV and CineD color profile as well.. I guess they increase screen resolution by 20% over GX85, so this may shorten its battery life.. And EXP dial seems to be really useful when use with M mode; otherwise using back or front dail may be more convenient.. And its great to hear that an IQ is mostly as beautiful as G9.. Panny JPEG seems to be noticably improved overtimes..
 
I mainly use 5 FPS mainly, so I guess I'm not very good then
That's your words. Not mine. I have no clue how good you are. Great photographers can make wonderful shots with limited gear and bad photographers will make bad photos with the best gear. But 5 fps is very limiting for fast action.
It actually sounds like you didn't test it for action and
I tested it's CAF performance and it is similar to that in my previous gx85 which was never great. Even with lenses of the latest generation. It's usable in a pinch. But it's not nearly as good as what my G9 or em1.2 could produce. And it's below what a midrange dslr would do. To me this CAF is not good for action let alone sports.
yes, the lenses do matter for action and sports, but you scored it anyway.
Well they do if what u put in the mix is slow focusing lenses like 20/1.7 or 25/1.4. As most of my lens lineup now is very quick focusing lenses like the place 2.8-4 range, there is little difference with all those lenses. Even on the G9 that stretches the limits far more - all my latest generation lenses perfome similarly.

Even my older 35-100/2.8 first generation seems to do the job.

As.for ranking it. Yes. I ranked it. The reality is that the contrast based system is for the most part not that great for CAF. The Panasonic dfd seems to be a bit better than base CD but only on the G9 it was brought to a level that is really impressive (maybe in the gh5 too. Haven't tested it). All Olympus cameras bar em1.2 have lousy CAF. And Panasonic is only marginally better with the entry level and mid ranger models. You don't have to agree of course. But please don't attack me for not liking my opinion

All the best.

Danny.

--
Worry about the image that comes out of the box rather than the box itself
-----------
Birds and BIF's ..... https://www.flickr.com/photos/124733969@N06/sets/
The need for speed ..... https://www.flickr.com/photos/130646821@N03/albums
 
I really think that you should have a long hard look at Danny's bird photography before you dig yourself any further into this particular hole ... ;-) .
 
I mainly use 5 FPS mainly, so I guess I'm not very good then
That's your words. Not mine. I have no clue how good you are. Great photographers can make wonderful shots with limited gear and bad photographers will make bad photos with the best gear. But 5 fps is very limiting for fast action.
It actually sounds like you didn't test it for action and
I tested it's CAF performance and it is similar to that in my previous gx85 which was never great. Even with lenses of the latest generation. It's usable in a pinch. But it's not nearly as good as what my G9 or em1.2 could produce. And it's below what a midrange dslr would do. To me this CAF is not good for action let alone sports.
yes, the lenses do matter for action and sports, but you scored it anyway.
Well they do if what u put in the mix is slow focusing lenses like 20/1.7 or 25/1.4. As most of my lens lineup now is very quick focusing lenses like the place 2.8-4 range, there is little difference with all those lenses. Even on the G9 that stretches the limits far more - all my latest generation lenses perfome similarly.

Even my older 35-100/2.8 first generation seems to do the job.

As.for ranking it. Yes. I ranked it. The reality is that the contrast based system is for the most part not that great for CAF. The Panasonic dfd seems to be a bit better than base CD but only on the G9 it was brought to a level that is really impressive (maybe in the gh5 too. Haven't tested it). All Olympus cameras bar em1.2 have lousy CAF. And Panasonic is only marginally better with the entry level and mid ranger models. You don't have to agree of course. But please don't attack me for not liking my opinion
Isn't the GX9 up to 9 FPS and not 6 FPS as you said ?? .......


Well that's a lot better :-) At least now it's making more sense and at least now you actually have an opinion worth reading on what I asked. A few questions is not attacking anyone surely.

This is where user reviews become completely strange and personal. Having it ranked at mediocre for action or sports is all relative. No matter what m4/3 box, I could make it work well. It's a matter of how you go about it. I would personally rank it quite high in that area, unless people are telling me that the lowly E-M10 is no good for sports or action as well.

It would be a bit like me saying that it's useless for landscape. While for you it might well be excellent. User reviews I find basically personal and very subjective.

Anyway, thanks finally for a decent post on your thoughts for action and sports. That's all I was asking for to start with ;-)

Danny.
 
Last edited:
Hi Danny,

I just looked at your website...... I have no interest in BIF but I can certainly appreciate the quality of your photography. Likewise the jetski photos are pretty amazing as well.

May I ask what lenses you use with your Sony NEX and A7 cameras?

I made a switch to an A6000 from MFT because for me, I can capture fast action better with Sony, using CAF and Lock-on Focus. I still have Lumix lenses and will pick up a G9 when the price drops a little.
 
Hi Danny,

I just looked at your website...... I have no interest in BIF but I can certainly appreciate the quality of your photography. Likewise the jetski photos are pretty amazing as well.

May I ask what lenses you use with your Sony NEX and A7 cameras?

I made a switch to an A6000 from MFT because for me, I can capture fast action better with Sony, using CAF and Lock-on Focus. I still have Lumix lenses and will pick up a G9 when the price drops a little.
I cheat and use Canon manual focus lenses. The same lenses go on both the Sony and the Oly's. So AF I know nothing about to be honest. A G9 in m4/3 makes a lot of sense IMO. Beautiful camera by the looks and somewhere down the line, I will probably get one, although I could make a GX9 work as well. The NEX-7 is still going strong after nearly 7 years and can still compete with the latest cameras. Sony makes darn good sensors and cameras IMO.

All the best and G9 .... nice ;-)

Danny.
 
I just wished it had the super-high-res mode for another thing to play around with. This is a primary camera that I'll consider upgrading my GF7 to. I would upgrade to a lightly used GF9 but I want the faster mechanical shutter (for hummingbirds) w/o needing a huge & expensive G9.
 
Last edited:
Same here, it would be nice to have high res mode for some detailed landscape work II do. I almost got Pen-f just for that.
 
Don't care about your final score, but really love the detailed review. Thanks so much since I am going to do the same thing you did: replace GX85 with a GX9
 
The OP left out the difference in 4k crop factor in comparison with GX85, GX9 is at 1.24 vs. 1.1 for GX85. For shooting videos, that's a significant downgrade unfortunately.
 
Isn't the GX9 up to 9 FPS and not 6 FPS as you said ?? .......

https://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/slrs/panasonic_dcgx9/specifications
9FPS with SAF.

6FPS with CAF. For sports an action I usually need CAF.
Well that's a lot better :-) At least now it's making more sense and at least now you actually have an opinion worth reading on what I asked. A few questions is not attacking anyone surely.

This is where user reviews become completely strange and personal. Having it ranked at mediocre for action or sports is all relative. No matter what m4/3 box, I could make it work well. It's a matter of how you go about it. I would personally rank it quite high in that area, unless people are telling me that the lowly E-M10 is no good for sports or action as well.
Well - I would say that you are making the most of out of your gear. I would not qualify an EM10 as good for sports and action (in fact, it's CAF is worse than the GX9). Does it mean it cannot be used for it? hell no it doens't mean that. People shot sports in the old days with manual cameras too.

But much like why the G9 got a silver and not a gold despite an identical score to the EM1.2 - is that we are living in a competitive world with lots of good options. So yes - CAN you shoot sports with a GX9? you can - if you have plenty of skill and patience. Is it the RIGHT camera to choose for sports? probably not. I would choose a G9 over a GX9 for that. I am not saying it is not usable, that's why I gave it mediocre and not bad. But I am saying that it's not the best for it.
It would be a bit like me saying that it's useless for landscape. While for you it might well be excellent. User reviews I find basically personal and very subjective.

Anyway, thanks finally for a decent post on your thoughts for action and sports. That's all I was asking for to start with ;-)
Happy to explain. In all honesty - I was more focused about the actual write up than that scoring at the bottom... maybe I was a bit too harsh with the mediocre, maybe saying just "ok" would be right. I definitely don't think its GOOD for that. but anyway...
 
The OP left out the difference in 4k crop factor in comparison with GX85, GX9 is at 1.24 vs. 1.1 for GX85. For shooting videos, that's a significant downgrade unfortunately.
you are correct. I noticed that in what of the reviews. I'm not much of a video shooter, and when I shoot video I'd usually shoot FullHD and not 4K anyway as the file sizes are just too much for me... but I agree - 4K crop is annoying, and such a big crop even more annoying.
 
Nice review. Recently upgraded to GX9 from GX800 and I am in love. For the price, I would say it is a bargain. Solid build, lovely screen, great controls and very good iq. Could not ask for more.
 
[...]
* Flash - the built in flash is pretty nice and can be tilted upwards. It also can control other flashes as a master without requiring an additional unit. Nice.
[...]

Is the GX9 really able to control a remote flassh with its internal flash? I have checked the menus of mine: Internal flash raised, Photo shooting menu -> "Flash" -> All "Wireless" options grayed out. So for me it looks that the internal flash is not able to remote control off-camera flashes.

My firmware version is 1.3.

Please tell me whether I need a firmware update or whether I did something wrong.

For me it is not a big problem as I do not use flash, but to warn other potential buyers ...

Till
 
I'm pretty certain you can't using the built in flash. I believe you need a strobe that can act as the commander.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top