RAPPS,
My vote would be for the S-50, as that's what I've just bought. When I was researching which Camera to buy, I also looked at the V-1 but decided against this very quickly when I actually looked at one in the store.
The V-1 had some significant shortcomings in my view, including:
-- poor ergonomics (if the Flash is extended, it's hard to hold the darn thing with one hand!)
-- poor battery life (the battery provided is too small, and can only be charged in the camera -- very poor design in my view! This is the ONLY battery that can be used in that Camera)
-- Size (it's a bit smaller than the G3, but still too large for my purposes and therefore not as easy to carry).
-- Memory Sticks (locally I find that the Memory Sticks are a lot more expensive than the equivalent size Compact Flash, especially the "Pro" models. I'm a bit annoyed by Sony's arrogant design philosophy, in not adopting a more universal memory format such as CF or SD).
The S-50 has a few problems also (legends flaking off the command dial, easy scratching of the Lucite LCD screen, excessive CA), however I still felt this was the better model.
I've only just received my S-50 so I'm still trying to learn how to use this. I'm not impressed with the results so far, but attribute that to my lack of skill (there's a bit of a learning curve in switching from film to digital).
Anyway, that's my two cents worth. Good luck with your decision!
Hi,
I am debating b/t the S50 and the Sony v1. The V1 is slightly more
expensive but seems to have more features. The S50 seems to have
better image quality according to most reviews. The V1 seems to
have white balance troubles.
Anyone have any suggestions b/t the 2 cameras, as far as quality of
photos and features go. I know I'll end up with a great camera
either way, but its a tough call.
Thx.
