Canon said:
The cost required to introduce [features like 4K] into cameras dictates the kind of features that we can introduce [in products of different classes]
Again, they said they don't have the tech at the right price yet.
I read a lot of dancing around with words that wasn't definitive one way or the other. It seemed like they were throwing up an intentional smoke screen to me.
They do dance around a lot. But the quotes I provided are clear. You should be able to pass through the blabla and retain the valuable information, but you seam to have ignored some important statements from your reading. May be confirmation bias ?
Besides do you think Canon would tell use at this point that they gimped the M50 for purposes of only product differentiation?
At this point it is conspiracy theory.
It is a theory as valid as Canon doesn't have the technical prowess to deliver 4k video with DPAF.
you right. But since Canon already do 4K with DPAF, this theory has 0 validity, and so, as you said, it is the same for your "canon intentionally crippled the M50 4K".
The plausible theory, backed up by Canon representative statements, is that their implementation of DPAF with 4K is too expensive for M50.
More seriously, I was referring to conspiracy theorists because it is exactly the kind of argument they use when someone with knowledge and implications on the matter refute their assumptions.
